Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Redding, CA 06/22
Tampa, FL 06/26
Tampa, FL 10/04

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

Slate Magazine - Should the United States ban a Japanese "rape simulator" game?
"Considering the impossibility of policing the Internet, as well as the availability of English RapeLay translations and forums for years before any politician caught wind of the game, it's unrealistic to think that the game could be banished from America. Very few Japanese developers make an effort to sell eroge to the West, and those that do, like Peach Princess and G-Collections, make content modifications to suit foreign norms and laws. (For example, all underage characters' ages get rounded up to 18, no matter how young the character looks.) These Westernized versions are sold in the United States via import sites like J-List and Play-Asia. Neither company sells RapeLay, but they do offer the popular eroge Yume Miru Kusuri. That game, while more edgy than it is violent, does focus on sex-crazed, underage-looking high schoolers with drug problems and suicide fetishes. RapeLay is appalling, but titles like Yume Miru Kusuri—sold in America after being unconvincingly modified so the protagonists are "18," making it tough to peg the games as outright illegal—would make far more constructive targets for political outrage."

Edge Online - Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? By Brad Wardell, CEO of Stardock, operator of Impulse.
"It's far too soon to assume that Steam will continue to dominate five years out. Thus far, it has largely operated without serious competition. With other services such as Impulse, Games for Windows Live, Amazon.com, GamersGate and others upping their own services with unique and compelling features, expanding their catalogs, and focusing on providing good customer experiences, I would be very surprised if Steam continues to have such a large market share (as a percentage) even 18 months from now."

CNET - Is the video game industry losing the PR battle?
"Based on what I've seen so far from the industry, it's willing to take a beating from government, lawyers, authors, and concerned groups and it does little to fight back. Meantime, I receive e-mails from parents on an almost daily basis asking me why video games are so bad for their kids. Whenever that happens, I write them a short but informative e-mail saying, 'They're not as bad as some groups say and here's research to prove it.'"

View
99. Re: Op Ed Mar 15, 2009, 01:58 Dades
 
You haven't provided a single piece of proof to support any of your claims in this thread.

I have definitely done this several times but I will summarize it all to make it easier. I am not saying the console is superior to the PC for the 100th time. I am not saying the PC is superior to the console. They both offer unique features, game genres and so on. I am simply refuting their claims that the PC is somehow a better platform for gaming simply based on it's technical capabilities. I've done so in detail several times now. I'm not going to repeat myself 20 more times. I don't really care if you think its "game set match", this isn't a game, it's a discussion.

To summarize and illustrate what both platforms offer and why I feel they are equal:

Console pros

- Ease of use
- Satisfactory graphical performance
- Large share of developers and publishers targeting the market
- Ease of development due to locked hardware specifications
- Exclusive games (library dependant on specific console)
- handheld capabilities (Nintendo DS, Sony PSP)
- Homebrew capabilities
- Limited backwards compatibility
- Well polished digital distribution with plentiful free and paid content
- Easy interface with television and computer for "media center" features

Console cons

- Locked hardware platform means forced upgrades every 5 years
- User modifications and custom content harder or impossible to develop
- Limited product lifetime support online
- Region coding makes importing difficult
- Hardware failure requires whole hardware RMA, little or no user ability to repair or upgrade
- Several game genres not well represented due to input peripheral support (RTS and MMO specifically as examples)
- Digital distribution DRM

PC pros:

- Technical capabilities based solely on user budget (sky is the limit for higher resolutions and so on)
- Widespread range of peripheral support
- Multitask support (can do things other than game at the same time)
- Homebrew/emulation support and communities
- Ability for users to self repair software and hardware
- User modifications and content (less these days but still a thriving community)
- Several digital distribution services
- Large library of titles
- "Fun" features - screenshots, user movies, etc.

PC cons:

- Shifting hardware platform makes development costly and QA more difficult (leads to more problematic game releases and higher budgets)
- Costly upgrades every 3-5 years to keep performance acceptable for gaming
- Several game genres unrepresented or abandoned (D&D RPGs, adventure, JRPG, race simulation, flight simulation and so on)
- Piracy much more widespread
- No longer a widely active lead platform for development (multiplatform releases often lack PC specific features, user interfaces and have problematic input support)
- Complexity issues for "average user"
- More difficult to interface with a television for media features
- DRM

I think all of that is pretty specific, balanced and accurately reflects my opinions on both platforms. For the record I own a Nintendo DS, a Playstation 3, Xbox 360, 4 PC's in the family and several hundred games.

To say that one is "better" than the other is pretty ludicrous. One may be "better" than the other when only comparing one aspect. I can say my Nintendo DS is "better" than my computer because I can take it with me on a train but that doesn't make it a valid statement. Saying that a PC is "better" because it can attain higher resolutions is likewise silly, that's one aspect of the platform.

On a technical basis the PC is superior at handling ANY multiplatform game - they can use console controllers and support higher resolutions, better quality textures, further viewing distances, more crowded scenes, etc. You can plug a PC into an HDTV, like a console, or an ultra-high resolution cinema display. With Steam you also don't need to worry about juggling discs or long load times. How, after all that, is the PC only equal?

No the PC is not superior at any multiplatform game. The PC is superior when it is a targeted lead platform for multiplatform development. You ignore the fact that multiplatform titles often don't have support for many of the things you mention. Plugging a PC into an HDTV isn't as simple because of space requirements, many people don't want their PC in their living room or den. Not all games are on Steam as well. That's ignoring other things that might be present in the PC title like DRM which the console version might lack. In fact, many titles are inferior on the PC due to developer neglect. You can say that in theory the PC is better when everything falls into place for a good port and that would be true depending on the genre of course. Sadly that isn't reality right now.

And yes I am cherry picking your post theyarecomingforyou because otherwise the size of this one would blot out the sun I think my above summary addresses the rest of your post adequately.

This comment was edited on Mar 15, 2009, 02:12.
 
Avatar 54452
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Mar 11, 04:05 Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? Bhruic
  2. Mar 11, 04:14  Re: Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? eRe4s3r
  5. Mar 11, 10:15   Re: Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? DDI
  3. Mar 11, 04:41 Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  6. Mar 11, 10:23  Re: Op Ed nin
  4. Mar 11, 10:06 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  9. Mar 11, 11:48  Re: Op Ed |RaptoR|
  23. Mar 11, 17:34  Re: Op Ed GT
  7. Mar 11, 11:16 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  16. Mar 11, 15:47  Re: Op Ed Krovven
  8. Mar 11, 11:47 Re: Op Ed  Frogboy 
  10. Mar 11, 12:56 Re: Op Ed Cutter
  12. Mar 11, 13:21  Re: Op Ed Zarkov
  18. Mar 11, 16:30   Re: Op Ed Cutter
  19. Mar 11, 16:59    Re: Op Ed Prez
  20. Mar 11, 17:09    Re: Op Ed Mashiki Amiketo
  22. Mar 11, 17:25     Re: Op Ed Prez
  57. Mar 12, 16:58      Re: Op Ed Mashiki Amiketo
  21. Mar 11, 17:22    Re: Op Ed bluemangrouptubes
  24. Mar 11, 18:11     Re: Op Ed Yifes
  28. Mar 11, 18:42      Re: Op Ed Silicon Avatar
  35. Mar 11, 21:31       Re: Op Ed Yifes
  36. Mar 11, 22:01        Re: Op Ed PHJF
  37. Mar 11, 22:16         Re: Op Ed Creston
  38. Mar 11, 22:17         Re: Op Ed Yifes
  13. Mar 11, 13:56  Re: Op Ed Jonny
  25. Mar 11, 18:12  Re: Op Ed Creston
  30. Mar 11, 19:48   Re: Op Ed Jonny
  31. Mar 11, 20:06   Re: Op Ed PHJF
  34. Mar 11, 21:28    Re: Op Ed Yifes
  11. Mar 11, 13:20 Re: Op Ed TheMilkman
  14. Mar 11, 14:54 Re: Op Ed bluemangrouptubes
  15. Mar 11, 15:24  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  17. Mar 11, 16:20 Re: Op Ed Kxmode
  26. Mar 11, 18:15 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  27. Mar 11, 18:20  Re: Op Ed Creston
  29. Mar 11, 19:34 Re: Op Ed Milkman Dan
  32. Mar 11, 20:12 Re: Op Ed Tanto Edge
  33. Mar 11, 21:22 Re: Op Ed bluemangrouptubes
  39. Mar 11, 22:59 Re: Op Ed bluemangrouptubes
  40. Mar 11, 23:23  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  41. Mar 11, 23:35   Re: Op Ed bluemangrouptubes
  42. Mar 12, 00:36 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  43. Mar 12, 01:04  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  44. Mar 12, 01:51   Re: Op Ed PHJF
  46. Mar 12, 02:42    Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  50. Mar 12, 13:04  Re: Op Ed Creston
  52. Mar 12, 13:45   Re: Op Ed Creston
  53. Mar 12, 14:35    Re: Op Ed Dades
  45. Mar 12, 02:18 Re: Op Ed monkay
  47. Mar 12, 10:05 Re: Op Ed Dades
  48. Mar 12, 12:09  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  49. Mar 12, 12:42   Re: Op Ed Dades
  54. Mar 12, 15:27    Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  56. Mar 12, 16:34     Re: Op Ed Z9000
  59. Mar 12, 19:48      Re: Op Ed Creston
  51. Mar 12, 13:07 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  55. Mar 12, 15:46 Re: Op Ed Dades
  60. Mar 12, 21:44  Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  61. Mar 12, 23:25   Re: Op Ed Prez
  62. Mar 12, 23:27  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  71. Mar 13, 10:17   Re: Op Ed Dades
  73. Mar 13, 12:25    Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  58. Mar 12, 17:48 Re: Op Ed RP
  63. Mar 13, 01:45 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  65. Mar 13, 02:47  Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  67. Mar 13, 03:16  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  68. Mar 13, 04:25   Re: Op Ed Z9000
  69. Mar 13, 05:33    Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  64. Mar 13, 02:39 Re: Op Ed RP
  66. Mar 13, 03:00 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  70. Mar 13, 10:17 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  72. Mar 13, 11:23 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  74. Mar 13, 12:39 Re: Op Ed Dades
  75. Mar 13, 12:52  Re: Op Ed Z9000
  76. Mar 13, 12:56 Re: Op Ed Dades
  78. Mar 13, 15:37  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  82. Mar 13, 21:10   Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  85. Mar 13, 23:55    Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  77. Mar 13, 15:27 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  79. Mar 13, 15:39 Re: Op Ed Dades
  81. Mar 13, 20:59  Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  83. Mar 13, 21:45   Re: Op Ed Dades
  80. Mar 13, 17:48 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  84. Mar 13, 23:30 Re: Op Ed Z9000
  111. Mar 15, 12:24  Re: Op Ed JohnnyRotten
  86. Mar 14, 00:42 Re: Op Ed RP
  87. Mar 14, 02:05 Re: Op Ed Dades
  88. Mar 14, 03:35  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  89. Mar 14, 10:20 Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  90. Mar 14, 12:41  Re: Op Ed Dades
  91. Mar 14, 14:11   Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  94. Mar 14, 20:37   Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  92. Mar 14, 17:07 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  93. Mar 14, 19:10 Re: Op Ed Dades
  95. Mar 14, 20:59 Re: Op Ed Dades
  96. Mar 14, 21:36  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  97. Mar 15, 00:23  Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  98. Mar 15, 01:39 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
>> 99. Mar 15, 01:58 Re: Op Ed Dades
  102. Mar 15, 04:38  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  100. Mar 15, 03:01 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  101. Mar 15, 03:45  Re: Op Ed Dades
  103. Mar 15, 04:43   Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  104. Mar 15, 04:55 Re: Op Ed Dades
  105. Mar 15, 04:59  Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  107. Mar 15, 05:16  Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  108. Mar 15, 09:36  Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  106. Mar 15, 05:02 Re: Op Ed Dades
  109. Mar 15, 10:20 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  110. Mar 15, 12:13 Re: Op Ed Dades
  112. Mar 15, 12:28  Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  113. Mar 15, 12:55   Re: Op Ed Dades
  116. Mar 15, 18:01    Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  117. Mar 15, 18:51     Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  118. Mar 15, 20:10      Re: Op Ed Dades
  120. Mar 16, 02:00       Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  121. Mar 16, 02:29       Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  122. Mar 16, 03:21       Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  114. Mar 15, 13:12 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  115. Mar 15, 13:24 Re: Op Ed Dades
  119. Mar 15, 22:29 Re: Op Ed Z9000


footer

.. ..

Blue's News logo