|
|
 |
| [Mar 11, 2009, 02:17 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Slate Magazine - Should the United
States ban a Japanese "rape simulator" game?
"Considering the impossibility of policing the Internet, as well as the
availability of English RapeLay translations and forums for years before any
politician caught wind of the game, it's unrealistic to think that the game
could be banished from America. Very few Japanese developers make an effort
to sell eroge to the West, and those that do, like Peach Princess and
G-Collections, make content modifications to suit foreign norms and laws.
(For example, all underage characters' ages get rounded up to 18, no matter
how young the character looks.) These Westernized versions are sold in the
United States via import sites like J-List and Play-Asia. Neither company
sells RapeLay, but they do offer the popular eroge Yume Miru Kusuri. That
game, while more edgy than it is violent, does focus on sex-crazed,
underage-looking high schoolers with drug problems and suicide fetishes.
RapeLay is appalling, but titles like Yume Miru Kusuri—sold in America after
being unconvincingly modified so the protagonists are "18," making it tough
to peg the games as outright illegal—would make far more constructive
targets for political outrage."
Edge
Online - Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? By Brad Wardell, CEO of
Stardock, operator of Impulse.
"It's far too soon to assume that Steam will continue to dominate five years
out. Thus far, it has largely operated without serious competition. With
other services such as Impulse, Games for Windows Live, Amazon.com,
GamersGate and others upping their own services with unique and compelling
features, expanding their catalogs, and focusing on providing good customer
experiences, I would be very surprised if Steam continues to have such a
large market share (as a percentage) even 18 months from now."
CNET - Is the
video game industry losing the PR battle?
"Based on what I've seen so far from the industry, it's willing to take a
beating from government, lawyers, authors, and concerned groups and it does
little to fight back. Meantime, I receive e-mails from parents on an almost
daily basis asking me why video games are so bad for their kids. Whenever
that happens, I write them a short but informative e-mail saying, 'They're
not as bad as some groups say and here's research to prove it.'"
 |
| 71. |
Re: Op Ed |
Mar 13, 2009, 10:17 |
Dades |
|
|
In any case, even if you include XBLA and DLC, the PC still has far, far more games than the 360. Quantity != Quality.
Exactly. USER-specific problems have nothing to do with PC gaming's superiority as a platform. If a user is too cheap/stupid to get a proper gaming rig, that's his problem. Flexibility is a key part of PC gaming's appeal. If you don't care about graphics, you don't need a high-end system. If you're a graphics whore, you can triple SLI 295 GTXs to your heart's delight. PC's provide gamers with the ability to improve their experience. Consoles do not. Actually consoles are gaining upgrade abilities already. Modules for storage are already present and I suspect GPU's will be next generation. Regardless, consoles provide a consistent development and gameplay experience platform. You blame users for not wanting to upgrade their PC's but then go on to say PC's are superior just because "they can". Too bad for your sake the majority of the market aren't enthusiasts.
As for the definition of high-profile, high profile = lots of people know about it. Lots of people know about the games I mentioned. Obviously console games are higher-profile than most PC games but that doesn't really have anything to do with quality. "Lots of people know about it" oh ok, glad you can pick an objective medium that can be quantified
You are claiming that having more blockbusters (games with big development and marketing budgets) is better than having more obscure games. No, that's you putting words in my mouth, I said nothing like that. Consoles are more consistent in their output of games to the market is all that I said. As in, you get more retail games to play. You can make some dumb argument about having 30 versions of Deer Hunter to play but in reality people get more genre and title variety by picking a console. That doesn't mean the PC is dead or dying, it doesn't mean PC games are inferior. It just means consoles have more depth nowadays. You don't own a console, I suspect you have no idea the sheer library of stuff available on XBLA, PSN and in-stores.
Yes, I am because it's a fact. A Ferrari is superior to a Chevy station wagon, even if you really love that station wagon. PC's can have more powerful hardware: Fact. PC's have more control schemes: Fact. Most PC ports have higher resolutions, framerates and tighter controls: Fact. No, it's not a fact. The PC as a platform is one of millions of hardware configurations. You can't even make the comparison in the first place. Which PC? The Wal-Mart PC? The HP laptop? You argue it's a strength, fine for you. I argue that it makes comparing the platforms themselves based on technical specifications pretty stupid. You're like a little kid back in the Nintendo vs Sega days, WAHH MY PLATFORM IS BETTER. It doesn't matter son, it's all about the games.
What are you talking about? I explicitly stated in a previous post that one of the advantages of the PC over consoles is the variety of controllers. You have gamepads, steering wheels, joysticks, arcade sticks, M/KB, etc, and you can choose the best controller for any given genre. Who you are fooling here you dinosaur? Most developers are moving to support a single controller on Windows and its a console controller. Steering wheels and flightsticks have died down thanks to their genre's almost disappearing. Consoles have all of those peripherals too, even mice and keyboards!
I'm not going to spend another 30 minutes replying the latter wall of text as it's most retreads of what I've already responded to. Z9000 is wrong as well, the console is not "better" than the PC. They offer complementary genres, experiences and so on. Owning both is far smarter than owning one and being an ignorant fanboy. |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Mar 11, 04:05 |
Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? |
Bhruic |
| |
2. |
Mar 11, 04:14 |
Re: Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? |
eRe4s3r |
| |
5. |
Mar 11, 10:15 |
Re: Why the -Age of Steam- May Not Last? |
DDI |
| |
3. |
Mar 11, 04:41 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
6. |
Mar 11, 10:23 |
Re: Op Ed |
nin |
| |
4. |
Mar 11, 10:06 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
9. |
Mar 11, 11:48 |
Re: Op Ed |
|RaptoR| |
| |
23. |
Mar 11, 17:34 |
Re: Op Ed |
GT |
| |
7. |
Mar 11, 11:16 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
16. |
Mar 11, 15:47 |
Re: Op Ed |
Krovven |
| |
8. |
Mar 11, 11:47 |
Re: Op Ed |
Frogboy |
| |
10. |
Mar 11, 12:56 |
Re: Op Ed |
Cutter |
| |
12. |
Mar 11, 13:21 |
Re: Op Ed |
Zarkov |
| |
18. |
Mar 11, 16:30 |
Re: Op Ed |
Cutter |
| |
19. |
Mar 11, 16:59 |
Re: Op Ed |
Prez |
| |
20. |
Mar 11, 17:09 |
Re: Op Ed |
Mashiki Amiketo |
| |
22. |
Mar 11, 17:25 |
Re: Op Ed |
Prez |
| |
57. |
Mar 12, 16:58 |
Re: Op Ed |
Mashiki Amiketo |
| |
21. |
Mar 11, 17:22 |
Re: Op Ed |
bluemangrouptubes |
| |
24. |
Mar 11, 18:11 |
Re: Op Ed |
Yifes |
| |
28. |
Mar 11, 18:42 |
Re: Op Ed |
Silicon Avatar |
| |
35. |
Mar 11, 21:31 |
Re: Op Ed |
Yifes |
| |
36. |
Mar 11, 22:01 |
Re: Op Ed |
PHJF |
| |
37. |
Mar 11, 22:16 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
38. |
Mar 11, 22:17 |
Re: Op Ed |
Yifes |
| |
13. |
Mar 11, 13:56 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jonny |
| |
25. |
Mar 11, 18:12 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
30. |
Mar 11, 19:48 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jonny |
| |
31. |
Mar 11, 20:06 |
Re: Op Ed |
PHJF |
| |
34. |
Mar 11, 21:28 |
Re: Op Ed |
Yifes |
| |
11. |
Mar 11, 13:20 |
Re: Op Ed |
TheMilkman |
| |
14. |
Mar 11, 14:54 |
Re: Op Ed |
bluemangrouptubes |
| |
15. |
Mar 11, 15:24 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
17. |
Mar 11, 16:20 |
Re: Op Ed |
Kxmode |
| |
26. |
Mar 11, 18:15 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
27. |
Mar 11, 18:20 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
29. |
Mar 11, 19:34 |
Re: Op Ed |
Milkman Dan |
| |
32. |
Mar 11, 20:12 |
Re: Op Ed |
Tanto Edge |
| |
33. |
Mar 11, 21:22 |
Re: Op Ed |
bluemangrouptubes |
| |
39. |
Mar 11, 22:59 |
Re: Op Ed |
bluemangrouptubes |
| |
40. |
Mar 11, 23:23 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
41. |
Mar 11, 23:35 |
Re: Op Ed |
bluemangrouptubes |
| |
42. |
Mar 12, 00:36 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
43. |
Mar 12, 01:04 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
44. |
Mar 12, 01:51 |
Re: Op Ed |
PHJF |
| |
46. |
Mar 12, 02:42 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
50. |
Mar 12, 13:04 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
52. |
Mar 12, 13:45 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
53. |
Mar 12, 14:35 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
45. |
Mar 12, 02:18 |
Re: Op Ed |
monkay |
| |
47. |
Mar 12, 10:05 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
48. |
Mar 12, 12:09 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
49. |
Mar 12, 12:42 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
54. |
Mar 12, 15:27 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
56. |
Mar 12, 16:34 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
59. |
Mar 12, 19:48 |
Re: Op Ed |
Creston |
| |
51. |
Mar 12, 13:07 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
55. |
Mar 12, 15:46 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
60. |
Mar 12, 21:44 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
61. |
Mar 12, 23:25 |
Re: Op Ed |
Prez |
| |
62. |
Mar 12, 23:27 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| >> |
71. |
Mar 13, 10:17 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
73. |
Mar 13, 12:25 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
58. |
Mar 12, 17:48 |
Re: Op Ed |
RP |
| |
63. |
Mar 13, 01:45 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
65. |
Mar 13, 02:47 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
67. |
Mar 13, 03:16 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
68. |
Mar 13, 04:25 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
69. |
Mar 13, 05:33 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
64. |
Mar 13, 02:39 |
Re: Op Ed |
RP |
| |
66. |
Mar 13, 03:00 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
70. |
Mar 13, 10:17 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
72. |
Mar 13, 11:23 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
74. |
Mar 13, 12:39 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
75. |
Mar 13, 12:52 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
76. |
Mar 13, 12:56 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
78. |
Mar 13, 15:37 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
82. |
Mar 13, 21:10 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
85. |
Mar 13, 23:55 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
77. |
Mar 13, 15:27 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
79. |
Mar 13, 15:39 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
81. |
Mar 13, 20:59 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
83. |
Mar 13, 21:45 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
80. |
Mar 13, 17:48 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
84. |
Mar 13, 23:30 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
| |
111. |
Mar 15, 12:24 |
Re: Op Ed |
JohnnyRotten |
| |
86. |
Mar 14, 00:42 |
Re: Op Ed |
RP |
| |
87. |
Mar 14, 02:05 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
88. |
Mar 14, 03:35 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
89. |
Mar 14, 10:20 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
90. |
Mar 14, 12:41 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
91. |
Mar 14, 14:11 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
94. |
Mar 14, 20:37 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
92. |
Mar 14, 17:07 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
93. |
Mar 14, 19:10 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
95. |
Mar 14, 20:59 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
96. |
Mar 14, 21:36 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
97. |
Mar 15, 00:23 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
98. |
Mar 15, 01:39 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
99. |
Mar 15, 01:58 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
102. |
Mar 15, 04:38 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
100. |
Mar 15, 03:01 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
101. |
Mar 15, 03:45 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
103. |
Mar 15, 04:43 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
104. |
Mar 15, 04:55 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
105. |
Mar 15, 04:59 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
107. |
Mar 15, 05:16 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
108. |
Mar 15, 09:36 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
106. |
Mar 15, 05:02 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
109. |
Mar 15, 10:20 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
110. |
Mar 15, 12:13 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
112. |
Mar 15, 12:28 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
113. |
Mar 15, 12:55 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
116. |
Mar 15, 18:01 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
117. |
Mar 15, 18:51 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
118. |
Mar 15, 20:10 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
120. |
Mar 16, 02:00 |
Re: Op Ed |
Jerykk |
| |
121. |
Mar 16, 02:29 |
Re: Op Ed |
StingingVelvet |
| |
122. |
Mar 16, 03:21 |
Re: Op Ed |
Bhruic |
| |
114. |
Mar 15, 13:12 |
Re: Op Ed |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
115. |
Mar 15, 13:24 |
Re: Op Ed |
Dades |
| |
119. |
Mar 15, 22:29 |
Re: Op Ed |
Z9000 |
|
|
|