On F.E.A.R. 2 Performance

[Feb 24, 2009, 02:25 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

There's an article on 3D Performance with F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin on FiringSquad (thanks Ant) and an article on F.E.A.R. 2 Gameplay Performance and IQ on [H] Enthusiast (thanks Voodoo Extreme), each to help you evaluate whether or not you should f.e.a.r. running Monolith's shooter sequel on your system.

View

13.

Re: On F.E.A.R. 2 Performance

Feb 24, 2009, 13:42

InBlack Taste is subjective so I have no issues with your comments. If you hated Crysis that much I can just imagine you're take on CoD4 or ever worst Far Cry2. Thank god COD4 single player was very short 4 hours max cause it was far from Great IMHO but most would probably disagree. I have to admit that CoD4 was 100X more fun online despite having the worst spawn system ever. ..in DM you just need to double back & buddy will respawn close to where he got fragged. ..now back on topic...80 to 85 score is low considering the impact the original game had. Eventhough it has no bug issues it seems to be a clear sky type debacle. Online is weak & single player has to be completed on hard to be any fun. My worst purchases... GEARS PC, Far Cry 2...