Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

Deus Ex 3 Details

Computer and Video Games offers the promised (story) first detail on Deus Ex 3, as the shooter/RPG sequel is previewed in the 200th issue of print magazine PC Zone, which has begun reaching subscribers in advance of its release on newsstands this Thursday. The game is under construction at Eidos Montreal with Deus Ex writer Sheldon Pacotti consulting on the project, and while Harvey Smith and Warren Spector are not involved, word is it has their "blessing." According to the article, Eidos Montreal is aware of complaints about Deus Ex: Invisible War, promising to redress "mistakes" like ammo type limitations. On the other hand, changes are described that further depart from Deus Ex canon, and make the project sound more like Gears of War, including combat relying more on player aim than stats, a cover system for stealth (rather than skulking in shadows), and an auto-healing system for damage. Thanks Jonas.

View
109. Re: ... Oct 6, 2008, 22:37 Jerykk
 
That is the goal of game design after all...to make things functional, understandable and fun.

Functional? Agreed. If your game doesn't work, that's a problem. Understandable? That depends entirely on the player. There are many players out there who don't understand how to play Civ. Does that mean the game isn't understandable? No, it just means certain players are retarded. Fun? Completely subjective. Only players can determine what is fun. The intent of designers is irrelevant. I found System Shock 2 to be more fun than Bioshock. According to the developers, I should find Bioshock more fun because it's more accessible.

If a player can't understand what they are supposed to do or how to upgrade items, then they need to let the players know that somehow.

Again, it depends entirely on the player. As I mentioned before, focus testing is usually performed with the lowest common denominator of players. I'm guessing that Bioshock was originally very similar to SS2, which is to say it was completely incomprehensible to the Halo kiddies they undoubtedly used as their focus group. SS2 was not incomprehensible to the many players who consider it a classic.

When all you do is focus on the slightest semblance of statements that supports your position while ignoring the fact that she outright says the changes made the game better...yes, your interpretation is slanted.

Say it with me: The player decides whether a game is better or not. Not the developers. I'm sure some of the developers of Bioshock think it is better than SS2. As a player who has played both games, I think SS2 is better. See what I'm getting at?

 
Avatar 20715
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Oct 4, 10:43 No subject NKD
  86. Oct 5, 12:48  Re: No subject Doma
  87. Oct 5, 14:07   Re: No subject Verno
  88. Oct 5, 14:42    Dorf Fort Fuzzmatang
  2. Oct 4, 10:44 This IP is SHOT! Techie714
  16. Oct 4, 12:25  Re: This IP is SHOT! Xyggy
  18. Oct 4, 13:12   GITS Wildone
  3. Oct 4, 10:45 ... theyarecomingforyou
  4. Oct 4, 10:47  Re: ... NKD
  26. Oct 4, 14:58   Re: ... Dittohead
  5. Oct 4, 10:47 d'oh DG
  6. Oct 4, 11:31 No subject Verno
  7. Oct 4, 11:49  Re: No subject nin
  10. Oct 4, 11:59  Re: No subject StaTik
  12. Oct 4, 12:05   Re: No subject NKD
  13. Oct 4, 12:07    Re: No subject NKD
  15. Oct 4, 12:24    Re: No subject StaTik
  8. Oct 4, 11:52 Deus Ex is dead. necrosis
  11. Oct 4, 12:01  Re: Deus Ex is dead. Cholma
  9. Oct 4, 11:57 No subject Cholma
  14. Oct 4, 12:15 No subject Tanto Edge
  17. Oct 4, 13:11 No subject irata
  19. Oct 4, 13:13 No subject Bluesfanboi
  20. Oct 4, 14:07  Re: No subject Prez
  21. Oct 4, 14:17 Ugh Creston
  23. Oct 4, 14:35  Re: Ugh NKD
  24. Oct 4, 14:39   Re: Ugh NKD
  27. Oct 4, 14:58    Re: Ugh Wildone
  25. Oct 4, 14:44  Deus Ex CJ_Parker
  22. Oct 4, 14:34 No subject Hump
  29. Oct 4, 15:13  Re: No subject Dreagon
  31. Oct 4, 15:26  Re: No subject DG
  32. Oct 4, 15:43  Re: No subject Prez
  33. Oct 4, 16:49   Re: No subject Ludomancer
  34. Oct 4, 17:20    Re: No subject NKD
  37. Oct 4, 18:28     Re: No subject Prez
  28. Oct 4, 15:03 They have inherited... Dreagon
  30. Oct 4, 15:19 No subject Verno
  35. Oct 4, 18:04 No subject DangerDog
  36. Oct 4, 18:27 No subject Kxmode
  38. Oct 4, 18:34 3rd person? Surf
  39. Oct 4, 18:38  Re: 3rd person? Prez
  43. Oct 4, 19:30  Re: 3rd person? Kxmode
  40. Oct 4, 18:41 No subject Verno
  41. Oct 4, 18:53 No subject Wilson
  42. Oct 4, 19:24  Re: No subject Ludomancer
  44. Oct 4, 19:53 True Surf
  46. Oct 4, 20:23  Re: True Jerykk
  47. Oct 4, 20:34   Re: True NKD
  48. Oct 4, 20:48    Re: True Prez
  49. Oct 4, 20:57    Re: True Jerykk
  50. Oct 4, 21:08     Re: True NKD
  51. Oct 4, 21:15      Re: True tuddies
  52. Oct 4, 21:19       Re: True Jerykk
  53. Oct 4, 21:30        Re: True NKD
  54. Oct 4, 21:40         Re: True Jerykk
  45. Oct 4, 20:09 Great quotes from dev DirkDaring
  55. Oct 4, 21:41 No subject Verno
  56. Oct 4, 21:43  Re: No subject Jerykk
  57. Oct 4, 22:02   Re: No subject NKD
  58. Oct 4, 22:22    Re: No subject Jerykk
  59. Oct 4, 22:26    Re: No subject Ludomancer
  60. Oct 4, 22:38     What I wouldn't give.. Dmitri_M
  62. Oct 4, 22:53     Re: No subject Dreagon
  64. Oct 4, 23:36      Re: No subject Kedyn
  66. Oct 5, 00:17       Re: No subject Jerykk
  67. Oct 5, 00:58        Re: No subject Prez
  68. Oct 5, 01:07         Re: No subject Jerykk
  69. Oct 5, 02:04       Re: No subject Verno
  70. Oct 5, 02:16        Re: No subject Jerykk
  71. Oct 5, 02:45         Re: No subject Kedyn
  89. Oct 5, 18:31        Re: No subject Shadowdean
  90. Oct 5, 18:52         Re: No subject Fuzzmatang
  61. Oct 4, 22:39 No subject KilrathiAce
  63. Oct 4, 23:35  Re: No subject Prez
  65. Oct 5, 00:05 No subject Cabezone
  72. Oct 5, 02:53 No subject Cabezone
  73. Oct 5, 03:08  Re: No subject Verno
  77. Oct 5, 07:19   Re: No subject Jerykk
  78. Oct 5, 08:03    No subject J
  74. Oct 5, 03:35 Why? Acleacius
  124. Oct 13, 12:09  Re: Why? Doc
  75. Oct 5, 04:06 No subject Verno
  76. Oct 5, 06:14  Re: No subject Prez
  79. Oct 5, 09:35 No subject tuddies
  80. Oct 5, 10:33 No subject Hump
  83. Oct 5, 12:17  Re: No subject NKD
  91. Oct 5, 19:03  Re: No subject Jerykk
  81. Oct 5, 10:46 ... theyarecomingforyou
  92. Oct 5, 19:10  Re: ... Jerykk
  93. Oct 5, 21:27   Re: ... Krovven
  94. Oct 5, 22:12    Re: ... Fuzzmatang
  95. Oct 5, 22:25     Re: ... Jerykk
  101. Oct 6, 03:21      Re: ... Krovven
  102. Oct 6, 11:55       Re: ... Jerykk
  103. Oct 6, 16:37        Re: ... Krovven
  104. Oct 6, 19:18         Re: ... Jerykk
  105. Oct 6, 20:46          Re: ... Krovven
  106. Oct 6, 21:18           Re: ... Jerykk
  107. Oct 6, 22:05            Re: ... Krovven
>> 109. Oct 6, 22:37             Re: ... Jerykk
  108. Oct 6, 22:10            Re: ... Krovven
  110. Oct 6, 22:43             Re: ... Jerykk
  111. Oct 6, 23:02              Re: ... Wowbagger_TIP
  116. Oct 6, 23:49              Re: ... Krovven
  117. Oct 7, 00:04               Re: ... Jerykk
  118. Oct 7, 00:31                Re: ... Wowbagger_TIP
  82. Oct 5, 12:15 So... Quboid
  84. Oct 5, 12:22  Re: So... Unzerpum
  85. Oct 5, 12:23  Re: So... NKD
  96. Oct 5, 23:23 Hmmmm Creston
  97. Oct 5, 23:27  Re: Hmmmm Jerykk
  98. Oct 6, 00:43   Re: Hmmmm Trainwreck
  99. Oct 6, 00:49    Re: Hmmmm Jerykk
  100. Oct 6, 00:52     Re: Hmmmm PHJF
  112. Oct 6, 23:07 No subject Verno
  113. Oct 6, 23:10  Re: No subject Jerykk
  114. Oct 6, 23:22   Re: No subject Prez
  115. Oct 6, 23:25    Re: No subject Jerykk
  119. Oct 7, 10:24 ... theyarecomingforyou
  120. Oct 7, 13:03  Re: ... Jerykk
  121. Oct 7, 16:38   Re: ... Prez
  122. Oct 7, 16:42   Re: ... Prez
  123. Oct 7, 16:49 ... theyarecomingforyou


footer

Blue's News logo