Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Redding, CA 06/22
Tampa, FL 06/26
Tampa, FL 10/04

Regularly scheduled events

NVIDIA on PC Exclusive Games

NVIDIA's Roy Taylor Interview on Eurogamer talks with the NVIDIA VP of Content Business Development in a conversation where he opines that the heyday of PC exclusive game development is coming to a close:

I think that we're going to see more digital authentication, and we're going to see more of an approach that says that PC games aren't products - they're a service. You're going to start out with a basic service, which is the game, and then increase the value of that service through patches, mod packs, expansions, maps and so on. That's the direction it's going to go, because the pirates are just killing the developers - and I think it's really unfair what they're doing.

In terms of your other point, which you're right, is related - in terms of where PC development sits relative to consoles, I think we have to face the facts - the value of consoles is such that no-one is going to make a PC-exclusive game in the future. Why would they? Why would they ignore consoles? That said, PC gaming is changing - and consoles don't threaten PC gaming. They're just different. Adapting to that and understanding that is what I think is really, really important. Most PC gamers also own consoles - not all of them, but a lot of them. What we're seeing happen is that, yes, people are developing for Xbox 360, for PS3 - but they're also developing for PC.

The console is now a baseline. If you look at Gears of War or Assassin's Creed, they came out on console and they were great experiences - but the PC versions had additional aspects to them that also made them attractive, whether you owned the console version or not. The PC version was better. That's something that people need to get their heads around - the console is a baseline, the PC is going to be an improved version. That's an exciting future, and that's why I don't see anything threatening about console at all.

The other aspect is that in the past, PC gaming development meant pandering to the lowest common denominator - which meant some poor integrated graphics. Today, developing a PC game means starting at a console, and console graphics are way above integrated graphics. That means the baseline is getting better. Now we're going to add to that version additional features, additional content, to make the PC version even better.

View
97. Re: No subject Jun 12, 2008, 00:05 Old_Geezer
 
"I don't give a shit if people watch American Idol or not, nor will I go out of my way to proclaim how low they are, much like what people have been doing here recently with the PC, which is what my original post was making fun of: the fanatic obsession to some loose set of ideals that compose PC gaming today/recent past.

I'll be over here playing games because I have fun with them, not because of some poorly defined superiority complex.
"

Then why do you even play PC games on a rig that likely cost three or four times as much as the four or five-hundered dollar consoles? So you can play at a higher resolution than the console gamers do on their bigscreens?

If it doesn't bug you that all your future games are going to be designed with gamepads (and their handful of buttons) in mind, then good for you! To see games like Operation Flashpoint, the older Rainbow 6 games etc..., the shooters with a gazillion functions, commands and the need to use strategy disappear from the radar because the corporate weasels who see nothing but the bottom line release the same thing on all platforms, totally sucks for those who want more depth in their gaming than what's on the consoles. The original Ghost Recon, again, a shooter with a fantastic and unique way to play (multiple teams/waypoint map/ability to directly control any team-member at will) was another great example...boy did that concept go down the toilet with the "sequel" who's gameplay, in absolutely no way, resembled the original and was a clear example of a PC game being designed with the console in mind. Then you've got all your sim fans (Silent Hunter submarine series and other naval sime, flight sims etc...) who may be looking at being cast to the side, again, in favor of the bottom line by a bunch of greedy corporate assholes. Those who used to get off on flying in the cockpits of F-16s SU-27s each with their unique flight characteristics etc...can look forward to the latest Jet-Plane-Go-Boom-Boom third-Person jet-shooter that they're slapping Tom Clancy's name on. Tom Clancy! That used to mean you're in for a deep experience modelled after reasonably realistic warfare. Now his name means some corporation owns it and can put it on anything they damned well want to put it on. You think people who like simulations and games with depth have no right to complain that the future of PC gaming doesn't include their favorite types of games?! Losing their favorite types of games so that corporations can just release their console games on the PC and ignore all the complexity the PCs human interface can offer is just something we should shut up about because you don't like hearing it?!

To accuse those who used to enjoy having to spend some time learning a game and having to think about what they were doing while playing it of having a superiority complex is narrow-sighted, self-important and petty. Sorry you felt so slighted! I don't mind a romp through bad-guy land and taking out 300-1000 trained and fully armed soldiers/Gangters/Aliens all by myself once in a while, but hating that the main reason I'm a PC gamer is going away doesn't make me an asshole, no matter how threatened or offended you are that alot of people prefer other types of games than you do.

You can play Atari's Pong if you want....I won't hate you for it or think any less of you. I just don't wanna be told I should play it too and forget about what I enjoy.

This comment was edited on Jun 12, 00:28.
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 10, 11:58 fuck em  cliffski 
  17. Jun 10, 13:19  Re: fuck em Ray Marden
  2. Jun 10, 11:58 Roy Taylor, you are fired rist3903
  42. Jun 10, 15:27  Re: Roy Taylor, you are fired bigspender
  3. Jun 10, 12:05 What a tool Jerykk
  4. Jun 10, 12:23  Re: What a tool Wildone
  7. Jun 10, 12:38   Re: What a tool Lorcin
  8. Jun 10, 12:43  Re: What a tool sponge
  11. Jun 10, 12:52   Re: What a tool Reactor
  50. Jun 10, 16:16   Re: What a tool zirik
  9. Jun 10, 12:47  Re: What a tool Lincolns Mullet
  5. Jun 10, 12:24 No subject space captain
  47. Jun 10, 15:49  Re: No subject Kxmode
  6. Jun 10, 12:27 No subject Okibi
  10. Jun 10, 12:50 Heh... Old_Geezer
  66. Jun 10, 19:03  Re: Heh... GreenTea
  76. Jun 10, 20:49   Re: Heh... Kxmode
  92. Jun 11, 17:19  Re: Heh... RoachMojo
  12. Jun 10, 12:53 No subject Veinman
  13. Jun 10, 13:02  Re: No subject Jerykk
  14. Jun 10, 13:05  Re: No subject manic half
  15. Jun 10, 13:14   Re: No subject Reactor
  18. Jun 10, 13:26    Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  19. Jun 10, 13:33     Re: No subject Lincolns Mullet
  22. Jun 10, 13:56      Re: No subject JaZeeL
  23. Jun 10, 14:04       Re: No subject Lincolns Mullet
  24. Jun 10, 14:11        Re: No subject Overon
  26. Jun 10, 14:24         Re: No subject Krovven
  49. Jun 10, 16:05          Re: No subject kanniballl
  51. Jun 10, 16:31           Re: No subject Jerykk
  52. Jun 10, 16:31           Re: No subject Tumbler
  56. Jun 10, 16:51            Re: No subject Kash
  69. Jun 10, 19:25             Re: No subject Chaos the Crazy
  55. Jun 10, 16:36           Re: No subject Krovven
  57. Jun 10, 16:58            Re: No subject bigspender
  60. Jun 10, 17:13             Re: No subject Krovven
  61. Jun 10, 17:27              Re: No subject manic half
  62. Jun 10, 17:44               Re: No subject Krovven
  65. Jun 10, 18:57                Re: No subject Ray Marden
  44. Jun 10, 15:32         Re: No subject manic half
  46. Jun 10, 15:43          Forgiveness Kxmode
  16. Jun 10, 13:19 ... theyarecomingforyou
  36. Jun 10, 15:10  Re: ... Jerykk
  20. Jun 10, 13:38 Rampant piracy FRAGaLOT
  21. Jun 10, 13:55  Re: Rampant piracy Lorcin
  74. Jun 10, 20:12  Re: Rampant piracy Warrax
  25. Jun 10, 14:18 PC Gaming Tumbler
  27. Jun 10, 14:28  Re: PC Gaming  dsmart 
  29. Jun 10, 14:46   Re: PC Gaming Krovven
  30. Jun 10, 14:50    Re: PC Gaming  dsmart 
  32. Jun 10, 14:52   Re: PC Gaming Sixis
  53. Jun 10, 16:32    Re: PC Gaming zirik
  64. Jun 10, 18:55     Re: PC Gaming Lorcin
  67. Jun 10, 19:08      Re: PC Gaming Jerykk
  68. Jun 10, 19:11       Re: PC Gaming tuddies
  71. Jun 10, 19:29       Re: PC Gaming Lorcin
  28. Jun 10, 14:39 lol Muscular Beaver
  31. Jun 10, 14:50 ... theyarecomingforyou
  33. Jun 10, 14:54 yep, they ARE different Daturan
  34. Jun 10, 14:59 No subject Nameless Again
  39. Jun 10, 15:17  Re: No subject Krovven
  35. Jun 10, 15:01 Piracy Pumas
  37. Jun 10, 15:11 Reality Tumbler
  38. Jun 10, 15:12 No subject Tim James
  40. Jun 10, 15:19  Re: No subject nin
  41. Jun 10, 15:20 I'll take up reading Kxmode
  43. Jun 10, 15:28 Hooray.... Dreagon
  45. Jun 10, 15:37  Re: Hooray.... bigspender
  48. Jun 10, 15:59 You are a pirate! Kxmode
  54. Jun 10, 16:32 No subject Tim James
  58. Jun 10, 17:01 No subject Reckless
  59. Jun 10, 17:03 No subject Paketep
  63. Jun 10, 17:53 No subject Tim James
  80. Jun 10, 22:53  Re: No subject bigspender
  70. Jun 10, 19:27 No subject sponge
  75. Jun 10, 20:35  Re: No subject Jerykk
  79. Jun 10, 22:31   Re: No subject sponge
  81. Jun 10, 23:04    Re: No subject Jerykk
  82. Jun 11, 00:15     Re: No subject CreamyBlood
  83. Jun 11, 01:25      Re: No subject bigspender
  91. Jun 11, 16:15     Re: No subject sponge
  93. Jun 11, 17:20      Re: No subject Krovven
  94. Jun 11, 20:15      Re: No subject Jerykk
  95. Jun 11, 21:23       Re: No subject sponge
  96. Jun 11, 22:34        Re: No subject Jerykk
>> 97. Jun 12, 00:05      Re: No subject Old_Geezer
  77. Jun 10, 20:50  Re: No subject Kxmode
  78. Jun 10, 22:22   Re: No subject Aero
  72. Jun 10, 19:44 Nvidia = liars, cheats mameyjamee
  73. Jun 10, 20:06  Re: Nvidia = liars, cheats PHJF
  84. Jun 11, 01:50 Well, to be fair Creston
  85. Jun 11, 02:46  Re: Well, to be fair Dwarf_Snowninja
  86. Jun 11, 05:29   Re: Well, to be fair bigspender
  87. Jun 11, 06:26    Re: Well, to be fair HellSlayer
  89. Jun 11, 09:46     Re: Well, to be fair Quicksilver
  90. Jun 11, 11:19      Re: Well, to be fair manic half
  99. Jun 16, 21:50     Re: Well, to be fair tuddies
  88. Jun 11, 09:23 No subject dryden555
  98. Jun 15, 12:12 No subject dryden555


footer

.. ..

Blue's News logo