|
|
 |
| [Dec 21, 2007, 11:37 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
A
post to the EQ Forums (thanks Mike Martinez and
Ars Technica) follows up on questions raised about the transfer of a guild
from an EverQuest II test server to a live server in a move contrary to SOE's
stated policies on the topic ( story). EQ2 senior producer Bruce
Ferguson admits to the move, said to be a "kindness" to valued testers for their
service, and says they will be reverting it by deleting the characters in
question. He also says these characters were stripped of key loot before the
transfer, something refuted in the original allegations and again contradicted
by an account of the whole affair on
Massively. Word is: There has been quite a bit of discussion recently
about something we were doing to show kindness to some valued members of our
testing community who have been working diligently to improve EverQuest II for
the last three years.
What we did was take a group of characters from the test server, scrub them by
hand of all test gear, and any 'privileged' equipment, titles, etc, and grant
their wish to continue to play as a group of friends, on a live server.
Had we been aware that being a little extra kind to these folks would cause such
an uproar, there is no doubt we would not have taken this step. However, due to
the current situation, I find myself apologizing to you for allowing this
situation to occur.
We are in the process now of removing the characters that we copied to the live
servers. Obviously, we overstepped the bounds of kindness in attempting to thank
these people for their efforts in testing, and we are working to rectify this
situation before the end of the day today.
 |
| 28. |
Re: EQ population |
Dec 21, 2007, 14:40 |
Cutter |
|
|
10 million, yeah right. It's funny how Blizzard always seems to be gainign subscribers and not losing any of them. Most everyone I know stopped playing over a year ago. After a year I was bored with it. Funny how they never mention how many customers they lose. I'd love to dearly know what the actual active/paying subscriber numers really are. I'd wager a hell of a lot less than 10 million.
"Grab a napkin, homie. You just got served." - Wolowitz |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Dec 21, 10:41 |
Meh... |
Tumbler |
| |
2. |
Dec 21, 10:46 |
No subject |
manic half |
| |
5. |
Dec 21, 10:59 |
Re: No subject |
Wowbagger_TIP |
| |
6. |
Dec 21, 11:04 |
Re: No subject |
Pumas |
| |
3. |
Dec 21, 10:57 |
No subject |
Hump |
| |
4. |
Dec 21, 10:59 |
No subject |
Luthier |
| |
7. |
Dec 21, 11:05 |
Re: No subject |
Frijoles |
| |
8. |
Dec 21, 11:11 |
Re: No subject |
Pumas |
| |
11. |
Dec 21, 11:19 |
Re: No subject |
Frijoles |
| |
12. |
Dec 21, 11:44 |
Re: No subject |
ibm |
| |
14. |
Dec 21, 11:55 |
Re: No subject |
Justin |
| |
15. |
Dec 21, 12:00 |
Re: No subject |
Spike |
| |
40. |
Dec 22, 09:18 |
Re: No subject |
Some Dude |
| |
9. |
Dec 21, 11:13 |
No subject |
manic half |
| |
10. |
Dec 21, 11:18 |
No subject |
Hump |
| |
13. |
Dec 21, 11:47 |
Re: No subject |
Cutter |
| |
16. |
Dec 21, 12:06 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
17. |
Dec 21, 12:07 |
Why should they be rewarded? |
Justus |
| |
18. |
Dec 21, 12:09 |
Holy shit |
Bludd |
| |
19. |
Dec 21, 12:27 |
Re: Holy shit |
ColoradoHoudini |
| |
20. |
Dec 21, 12:33 |
No subject |
Acleacius |
| |
21. |
Dec 21, 12:39 |
Re: No subject |
Luthier |
| |
22. |
Dec 21, 12:48 |
No subject |
sponge |
| |
23. |
Dec 21, 13:23 |
Re: No subject |
ldonyo |
| |
24. |
Dec 21, 13:26 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
25. |
Dec 21, 13:44 |
Re: No subject |
Surf |
| |
26. |
Dec 21, 13:44 |
EQ population |
MMORPGHoD |
| |
27. |
Dec 21, 14:20 |
Re: EQ population |
Sepharo |
| |
30. |
Dec 21, 15:17 |
Re: EQ population |
Mead |
| |
33. |
Dec 21, 15:40 |
Re: EQ population |
Krovven |
| >> |
28. |
Dec 21, 14:40 |
Re: EQ population |
Cutter |
| |
29. |
Dec 21, 14:58 |
Re: EQ population |
Frijoles |
| |
31. |
Dec 21, 15:34 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
32. |
Dec 21, 15:37 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
38. |
Dec 21, 18:37 |
Re: ... |
Brian |
| |
39. |
Dec 22, 00:38 |
No subject |
Kedyn |
| |
34. |
Dec 21, 15:55 |
Yeah, whatever |
Tigger |
| |
35. |
Dec 21, 16:04 |
No subject |
Pinky's Brain |
| |
36. |
Dec 21, 16:06 |
spam |
qus-i |
| |
37. |
Dec 21, 17:41 |
No subject |
Hump |
| |
41. |
Dec 22, 10:52 |
Ha |
RaZ0r! |
|
|
|