|
|
 |
| [Aug 23, 2007, 9:58 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
The Cult of Rapture
has word that a couple of BioShock topics that have been getting a lot of
attention from the community are being addressed, as they are increasing the
number of activations allowed by the SecuROM software from two
( story) to five, and are at work on patch to address widescreen
issues ( story). They are also creating a revocation tool to
deactivate a BioShock installation and have given SecuROM more leeway to
directly assist customers with activation issues. Finally, they have posted a
new technical FAQ
covering these and other topics. Word is: We have been reading and
listening to your frustrations over SecuROM, PC activation problems, and
technical support issues since BioShock launched on Tuesday, and we've devised a
plan to help.
Starting immediately, we will be upping the activation count to a 5 by 5 plan.
We will be raising the maximum amount of computers a user can have BioShock
installed on simultaneously from 2 to 5, and allowing a user to reinstall
BioShock on each of those computers from 3 times to 5 times. Also, we have in
the works a revoke tool which you will be able to run on your machine if you
want to free up that key and move it to to another computer (this works very
much like Steam or iTunes system). We are also working with SecuROM and 2K
customer service, so that when you do need to call in support problems, you get
answers to your questions faster, without much waiting or being bounced around.
SecuROM has been given much more autonomy to help fix your problems quickly and
effectively. I am personally sorry for anyone who got bounced around in the past
couple days (I even think I contributed to this problem) and we're going to make
sure that does not happen in the future.
As for other technical issues, we are bringing on a team of tech support that
will be on the 2K forums 24/7 to help people resolve their technical issues. Our
QA guys are in the offices and on the forums, too, reproducing issues and
looking for workarounds and compiling information that they can put towards
making you a patch and updating the
knowledge base.
Also, we are aware that our activation server went down last night, stopping
some of you from finishing your installs. The server is up and running now and
we have corrected the problem that caused that crash.
Finally, we have released a FAQ, which you can view in full below (and will also
be posted on the 2K Forums in the Technical Support area) that will help clear
up a lot of questions and misinformation that has been floating around about
SecuROM and PC activation.
And as for widescreen, we also want to say we completely understand a user's
desire to augment their FOV. BioShock is a harrowing experience, but we don't
want anyone to feel limited (or motion sick!). So we are in the process of
working on an official PC patch to give widescreen PC users a choice to expand
their horizontal FOV, and are investigating creating a similar update for the
360.
And finally, I want to personally congratulate Racer_S from the
Widescreen Gaming Forums, and his awesome user patch to expand the widescreen
FOV in BioShock. I'm currently tracking him down via email, but hopefully, he'll
accept my gratitude, and maybe an Nvidia 8800 to boot.
Read the full
technical FAQ.
 |
| 58. |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Aug 24, 2007, 03:06 |
Lev Arris |
|
|
Of course it would have because it wouldn't be such a rude awakening now. Whether or not YOU think that the brief description on the box is enough, it obviously wasn't enough to the people who bought the game and are complaining now because they can't run it on what they have. That's what matters. Isn't that what demo's are for? And yes the PC demo came out like 1 day before release, but if you are too busy to try the demo, and too busy to read system specs, how do you have time to play the game?
And what did they say? The same terse and vague words as on the box? And just where were these released? On the preorder boxes in the stores? That is where it would have mattered. So it's more about pre-orders now? I would have thought if people were so keen on a game to go down to the game store and lay down smoe cash, they may have to time to make sure they can run it. I can understand some people getting caught out by buying it on day one cause they believed the hype, or on impulse. But if you are aware of the game, and are pre-ordering it, at what point should you be responsible for finding out if it's going to work for you.
No, it isn't. Retailers refuse and point to the publishers. So because retailers pass the buck, the publisher must carry it? Comeon. If my new car doesn't work I don't go to the manufacturer, I goto the dealer. If there was a manufacturing problem, then it's their responsibility, but as far as i can tell, they stated the requirements, and they provided a product that meets them. If this not the case? Please tell me where they said it would support pixel shader 2.0 cards.
This comment was edited on Aug 24, 03:07. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Aug 23, 22:04 |
Free 8800 |
Lev Arris |
| |
2. |
Aug 23, 22:09 |
Re: Free 8800 |
MachineMk2 |
| |
5. |
Aug 23, 22:22 |
Re: Free 8800 |
Charlie_Six |
| |
6. |
Aug 23, 22:26 |
ouch |
maldoror |
| |
3. |
Aug 23, 22:11 |
Oh wow |
Mead |
| |
4. |
Aug 23, 22:15 |
No subject |
>U |
| |
7. |
Aug 23, 22:29 |
Re: No subject |
John Lovitz |
| |
10. |
Aug 23, 22:42 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
15. |
Aug 23, 22:51 |
Re: No subject |
nin |
| |
18. |
Aug 23, 23:06 |
Re: No subject |
ViRGE |
| |
8. |
Aug 23, 22:31 |
No subject |
space captain |
| |
9. |
Aug 23, 22:41 |
Re: No subject |
Enahs |
| |
13. |
Aug 23, 22:46 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
14. |
Aug 23, 22:50 |
Re: No subject |
Than |
| |
16. |
Aug 23, 22:58 |
Re: No subject |
sponge |
| |
17. |
Aug 23, 23:04 |
Re: No subject |
Than |
| |
20. |
Aug 23, 23:22 |
Re: No subject |
CJ_Parker |
| |
21. |
Aug 23, 23:28 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
23. |
Aug 23, 23:29 |
Re: No subject |
MMORPGHoD |
| |
25. |
Aug 23, 23:48 |
Funny. |
Veterator |
| |
41. |
Aug 24, 01:44 |
Re: No subject |
DukeP |
| |
45. |
Aug 24, 02:10 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
46. |
Aug 24, 02:25 |
Re: No subject |
DukeP |
| |
49. |
Aug 24, 02:27 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
51. |
Aug 24, 02:31 |
Re: No subject |
DukeP |
| |
53. |
Aug 24, 02:35 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
24. |
Aug 23, 23:36 |
Re: No subject |
sponge |
| |
19. |
Aug 23, 23:10 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
22. |
Aug 23, 23:28 |
Re: No subject |
space captain |
| |
11. |
Aug 23, 22:42 |
Re: No subject |
HardCore |
| |
12. |
Aug 23, 22:46 |
No subject |
TomeOne |
| |
26. |
Aug 23, 23:51 |
No subject |
HIGH_PING |
| |
27. |
Aug 24, 00:13 |
Re: No subject |
Prez |
| |
28. |
Aug 24, 00:30 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
29. |
Aug 24, 00:32 |
STarforce raped my childhood |
Wildone |
| |
31. |
Aug 24, 00:36 |
Re: No subject |
Prez |
| |
79. |
Aug 24, 04:26 |
Re: No subject |
cliffski |
| |
83. |
Aug 24, 04:42 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
88. |
Aug 24, 07:30 |
Re: No subject |
Tulwinn |
| |
128. |
Aug 24, 21:55 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
30. |
Aug 24, 00:32 |
And... voila |
Creston |
| |
32. |
Aug 24, 00:36 |
Duh! |
kookaveetsa |
| |
33. |
Aug 24, 00:53 |
So... |
MyRealName |
| |
34. |
Aug 24, 00:58 |
Re: So... |
Prez |
| |
39. |
Aug 24, 01:28 |
Re: So... |
MyRealName |
| |
59. |
Aug 24, 03:09 |
Re: So... |
Prez |
| |
60. |
Aug 24, 03:14 |
Re: So... |
Lev Arris |
| |
85. |
Aug 24, 05:05 |
Re: So... |
Optimaximal |
| |
86. |
Aug 24, 05:39 |
Re: So... |
Prez |
| |
90. |
Aug 24, 08:00 |
Re: So... |
Brainp0wa |
| |
91. |
Aug 24, 08:57 |
Re: So... |
kanniballl |
| |
92. |
Aug 24, 09:08 |
Re: So... |
Enahs |
| |
94. |
Aug 24, 09:24 |
Re: So... |
Optimaximal |
| |
98. |
Aug 24, 10:09 |
Re: So... |
Enahs |
| |
103. |
Aug 24, 11:18 |
Re: So... |
MyRealName |
| |
87. |
Aug 24, 06:51 |
Re: So... |
Bet |
| |
89. |
Aug 24, 07:56 |
Re: So... |
nin |
| |
127. |
Aug 24, 21:50 |
Re: So... |
>U |
| |
38. |
Aug 24, 01:17 |
Re: So... |
CreamyBlood |
| |
44. |
Aug 24, 02:07 |
Re: So... |
>U |
| |
48. |
Aug 24, 02:26 |
Re: So... |
Jerykk |
| |
57. |
Aug 24, 03:02 |
Re: So... |
>U |
| |
65. |
Aug 24, 03:29 |
Re: So... |
Stolk |
| |
68. |
Aug 24, 03:35 |
Re: So... |
>U |
| |
80. |
Aug 24, 04:30 |
Re: So... |
cliffski |
| |
82. |
Aug 24, 04:37 |
Re: So... |
>U |
| |
135. |
Aug 25, 00:13 |
Re: So... |
CreamyBlood |
| |
35. |
Aug 24, 01:04 |
Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
37. |
Aug 24, 01:10 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Prez |
| |
43. |
Aug 24, 02:03 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
55. |
Aug 24, 02:39 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
56. |
Aug 24, 02:51 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| >> |
58. |
Aug 24, 03:06 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
61. |
Aug 24, 03:15 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
62. |
Aug 24, 03:20 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Prez |
| |
64. |
Aug 24, 03:28 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
66. |
Aug 24, 03:30 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
67. |
Aug 24, 03:32 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Stolk |
| |
69. |
Aug 24, 03:37 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
72. |
Aug 24, 03:53 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
74. |
Aug 24, 03:59 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
63. |
Aug 24, 03:26 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
71. |
Aug 24, 03:48 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
73. |
Aug 24, 03:57 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Prez |
| |
76. |
Aug 24, 04:05 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
75. |
Aug 24, 04:01 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
77. |
Aug 24, 04:12 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
78. |
Aug 24, 04:21 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
81. |
Aug 24, 04:33 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
84. |
Aug 24, 04:58 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
Lev Arris |
| |
125. |
Aug 24, 21:38 |
Re: Maybe research first. |
>U |
| |
36. |
Aug 24, 01:08 |
Mod issues |
Wilson |
| |
40. |
Aug 24, 01:28 |
No subject |
VoodooV |
| |
42. |
Aug 24, 01:48 |
No subject |
Downer28 |
| |
47. |
Aug 24, 02:25 |
No subject |
cronik |
| |
50. |
Aug 24, 02:29 |
No subject |
WyldKat |
| |
52. |
Aug 24, 02:32 |
Re: No subject |
>U |
| |
54. |
Aug 24, 02:35 |
Re: No subject |
DukeP |
| |
70. |
Aug 24, 03:42 |
FOV patch |
Bludd |
| |
93. |
Aug 24, 09:22 |
No subject |
^mortis^ |
| |
95. |
Aug 24, 09:31 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
108. |
Aug 24, 12:11 |
Re: ... |
dryden555 |
| |
114. |
Aug 24, 14:42 |
Re: ... |
Jerykk |
| |
116. |
Aug 24, 15:55 |
Re: ... |
General Ego |
| |
117. |
Aug 24, 16:14 |
Re: ... |
dubfanatic |
| |
96. |
Aug 24, 09:43 |
Bioshock |
mysticmage |
| |
97. |
Aug 24, 10:08 |
Re: Bioshock |
Overon |
| |
99. |
Aug 24, 10:15 |
Re: Bioshock |
MMORPGHoD |
| |
101. |
Aug 24, 10:38 |
Re: Bioshock |
doktor_tchock |
| |
102. |
Aug 24, 10:52 |
Re: Bioshock |
cliffski |
| |
104. |
Aug 24, 11:46 |
Re: Bioshock |
Jerykk |
| |
105. |
Aug 24, 11:55 |
Re: Bioshock |
Enahs |
| |
106. |
Aug 24, 12:00 |
Re: Bioshock |
Stolk |
| |
115. |
Aug 24, 15:49 |
Re: Bioshock |
dubfanatic |
| |
123. |
Aug 24, 18:51 |
Re: Bioshock |
cliffski |
| |
124. |
Aug 24, 19:33 |
Re: Bioshock |
ibm |
| |
126. |
Aug 24, 21:45 |
Re: Bioshock |
>U |
| |
100. |
Aug 24, 10:30 |
Re: |
Rseman |
| |
129. |
Aug 24, 22:06 |
Re: |
>U |
| |
107. |
Aug 24, 12:02 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
110. |
Aug 24, 13:08 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
112. |
Aug 24, 14:16 |
Re: ... |
nin |
| |
113. |
Aug 24, 14:21 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
131. |
Aug 24, 22:16 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
136. |
Aug 25, 11:50 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
138. |
Aug 25, 12:20 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
139. |
Aug 25, 14:11 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
140. |
Aug 25, 16:52 |
Re: ... |
Sepharo |
| |
141. |
Aug 25, 22:29 |
Re: ... |
CreamyBlood |
| |
142. |
Aug 25, 23:50 |
Re: ... |
Prez |
| |
130. |
Aug 24, 22:09 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
109. |
Aug 24, 12:42 |
Why have SuckuRom in the Steam version? |
Skoll |
| |
111. |
Aug 24, 13:30 |
Re: Why have SuckuRom in the Steam versi |
Bet |
| |
118. |
Aug 24, 16:16 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
119. |
Aug 24, 16:23 |
Re: ... |
dubfanatic |
| |
120. |
Aug 24, 16:28 |
Re: |
Rseman |
| |
121. |
Aug 24, 16:33 |
Re: |
dubfanatic |
| |
122. |
Aug 24, 16:45 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
132. |
Aug 24, 22:27 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
133. |
Aug 24, 22:39 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
134. |
Aug 24, 22:56 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
137. |
Aug 25, 11:52 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
143. |
Aug 26, 21:29 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
144. |
Aug 28, 22:53 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
145. |
Aug 28, 23:16 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
146. |
Aug 29, 00:01 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
147. |
Aug 29, 00:08 |
Re: ... |
Prez |
| |
150. |
Aug 29, 09:12 |
Re: ... |
nin |
| |
152. |
Aug 29, 14:27 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
151. |
Aug 29, 14:22 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
148. |
Aug 29, 08:34 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
153. |
Aug 29, 14:40 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
155. |
Aug 29, 16:46 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
149. |
Aug 29, 08:48 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
154. |
Aug 29, 14:45 |
Re: ... |
>U |
| |
161. |
Aug 30, 15:34 |
Re: ... |
Ecthelion |
| |
162. |
Sep 2, 19:11 |
Re: ... |
doktor_tchock |
| |
156. |
Aug 29, 18:14 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
157. |
Aug 29, 18:56 |
Re: ... |
Krovven |
| |
158. |
Aug 29, 20:13 |
EA are lazy |
cronik |
| |
159. |
Aug 29, 23:36 |
Re: EA are lazy |
Prez |
| |
160. |
Aug 30, 13:29 |
Re: EA are lazy |
nin |
|
|
|