|
|
 |
| [Jun 21, 2007, 10:40 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
Intel wants fair and balanced online gaming reports that Intel is showing
off a research project that may lead to technology to fight things like cheating
in online games and click fraud via the PC's hardware: SANTA CLARA,
Calif.--There's always one guy who seems a little too good at mowing down
players in a Quake 3 session. Intel thinks future PC gamers might be interested
in technology that helps level the playing field.
The company showed off a research project into "anti-cheat technology" during
its Research@Intel Day at Intel headquarters. The idea is that Intel and the PC
gaming industry would build technology into gaming rigs that could detect when
common cheats--such as "aimbots" that handle targeting while the player just
holds down the trigger--are used in an online gaming session, said Travis
Schluessler, a researcher at Intel.
Cheats such as aimbots or "wall hacks" that expose players lying in wait send
data to online gaming servers in unnatural patterns that could be detected by
other PCs connected to the same server, Schluessler said. PCs equipped with this
technology would notify a server that someone in the game is using a cheat, and
then the game administrator could set a policy of kicking the cheat offline or
some high-tech method of saying "nyeh, nyeh, cheater cheater," shaming the
cheater and warning other gamers not to enter into sessions with that particular
player.
Intel is still working out the details; don't expect to find this in a high-end
gaming PC anytime soon. This also being Intel, there's more practical
business-related implications for the technology as well, such as click-fraud
detection. But with the amount of money that serious PC gamers spend on their
rigs and software, there could be a market among those who don't want to see
their investments ruined by cheaters.
 |
| 32. |
Re: ... |
Jun 21, 2007, 22:38 |
skyguy |
|
|
"The US wouldn't allow it unless there was an easy way around it - they "need" to be able to read everyones email. Just like after 9/11 email from around the world was routed through the US, I learnt from an engineer at NTL (UK ISP). The US likes to police the world and technologies like this don't exactly fill me with confidence."
So use an encryption algorithm that wasn't designed by the US government... you can encrypt your e-mail however the hell you want. Its yours. I'm sorry, the US government does not have magical wiretaps on everyone in the world's computers, they do not control the software that you choose to use, and they do not have "secret keys" to all encryption algorithms used in the world. If you really believe that the government can read any e-mail no matter how it was encrypted then you should start wearing tinfoil hats to keep the government from injecting the voices into your head.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Jun 21, 10:50 |
via the PC's hardware |
rocketpcguy |
| |
38. |
Jun 22, 04:47 |
anti-cheat |
Rockn-Roll |
| |
39. |
Jun 22, 09:59 |
Re: anti-cheat |
MTechnik |
| |
2. |
Jun 21, 11:08 |
No subject |
Igor |
| |
3. |
Jun 21, 11:42 |
Re: No subject |
MrShoop |
| |
4. |
Jun 21, 12:01 |
Re: No subject |
Overon |
| |
5. |
Jun 21, 12:17 |
Sounds Good! |
Techie714 © |
| |
6. |
Jun 21, 12:25 |
Re: Sounds Good! |
The Half Elf |
| |
8. |
Jun 21, 12:33 |
Re: Sounds Good! |
m00t |
| |
9. |
Jun 21, 12:38 |
Re: Sounds Good! |
Skookum |
| |
16. |
Jun 21, 13:37 |
Re: Sounds Good! |
JD |
| |
7. |
Jun 21, 12:31 |
Nope |
venomhed |
| |
10. |
Jun 21, 12:42 |
If there we no cheaters... |
Brian |
| |
11. |
Jun 21, 13:06 |
Re: If there we no cheaters... |
L0cky |
| |
12. |
Jun 21, 13:16 |
Interesting. |
Woody |
| |
13. |
Jun 21, 13:21 |
hmm |
insel |
| |
14. |
Jun 21, 13:33 |
No subject |
JD |
| |
15. |
Jun 21, 13:37 |
Re: No subject |
insel |
| |
17. |
Jun 21, 13:37 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
18. |
Jun 21, 13:45 |
Re: ... |
PHJF |
| |
19. |
Jun 21, 14:52 |
Re: ... |
dubfanatic |
| |
20. |
Jun 21, 15:43 |
Re: ... |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
21. |
Jun 21, 16:00 |
Re: ... |
Wildone |
| |
23. |
Jun 21, 18:09 |
Re: ... |
JaZeeL |
| |
28. |
Jun 21, 20:12 |
Re: ... |
skyguy |
| |
22. |
Jun 21, 17:41 |
Cheating isn't the problem. |
Skoll |
| |
24. |
Jun 21, 18:14 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
JD |
| |
25. |
Jun 21, 18:32 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
Brian |
| |
34. |
Jun 22, 01:35 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
JD |
| |
36. |
Jun 22, 03:27 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
Brian |
| |
37. |
Jun 22, 04:45 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
JD |
| |
40. |
Jun 22, 15:09 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
Brian |
| |
41. |
Jun 22, 21:22 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
JD |
| |
42. |
Jun 23, 01:22 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
Brian |
| |
43. |
Jun 23, 12:41 |
Re: Cheating isn't the problem. |
JD |
| |
26. |
Jun 21, 19:12 |
No subject |
Volk |
| |
27. |
Jun 21, 20:05 |
No subject |
Icewind |
| |
29. |
Jun 21, 20:40 |
... |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
30. |
Jun 21, 20:45 |
Re: ... |
AcidDrone |
| >> |
32. |
Jun 21, 22:38 |
Re: ... |
skyguy |
| |
33. |
Jun 21, 22:48 |
Re: ... |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
35. |
Jun 22, 01:44 |
Re: ... |
JD |
| |
31. |
Jun 21, 22:38 |
Intel to Fight Game Cheating? |
Kxmode |
|
|
|