25 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
 |
| 25. |
Re: NDA |
May 3, 2007, 15:24 |
Kxmode |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 24. |
Re: NDA |
May 3, 2007, 09:37 |
Grounded |
|
|
who cares about the NDA seriously
If we had more people breaking it, we would get less garbage than Vanguard. I like the way Lord of the Rings Online did it. Open beta to everyone, you dont like it, dont buy it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 23. |
NDA |
May 2, 2007, 20:56 |
Kxmode |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 22. |
Re: No beta here :( |
May 2, 2007, 20:09 |
DrEvil |
|
|
If your one of those types who goes into beta, see's an unfinished game and figure the game sucks and will suck at release to, then you don't belong in beta testing. No, I'm one of those silly types of Software *Developers* who thinks a program or game had better have a good "hook" when it goes to beta. Whether or not is good is in the eye of the beholder I suppose. This comment was edited on May 2, 21:11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 21. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 20:03 |
DrEvil |
|
|
This comment was edited on May 2, 20:28. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 20. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 20:00 |
DrEvil |
|
|
Then do the beta people a favor, DrEvil: QUIT. Walk away and let those that are there to TEST the game instead of getting cheap (as in, free) gameplay to become oh-so-uber at a game in beta do their job. I'm not breaking the NDA. I'm speaking in very generic terms without giving any specifics. I have thoroughly read the legal agreement and see absolutely nothing that precludes me from speaking in generic ways that do not disclose anything regarding their intellectual property specifics. Everything I've mentioned can be gathered from public screenshots, and impressions articles posted by reviewers.
This comment was edited on May 2, 20:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 19. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 19:59 |
DrEvil |
|
|
\ This comment was edited on May 2, 20:26. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 18. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 19:38 |
nin |
|
|
and breaking the NDA.
Oh NO!!!!! Not THAT!!!!!!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------- Listen, now: http://yearzero.nin-thespiral.com/FLJoi4gjw2f/player.html |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 17. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 19:01 |
Talisorn |
|
|
DrEvil: Perhaps you need to be giving suggestions to the development team rather than breaking this over Blues .... and breaking the NDA. Otherwise, what the hell are you doing beta testing ... apart from playing the game for free.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 16. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 18:57 |
AnarKane |
|
|
| Then do the beta people a favor, DrEvil: QUIT. Walk away and let those that are there to TEST the game instead of getting cheap (as in, free) gameplay to become oh-so-uber at a game in beta do their job. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
"We can do this one of two ways. There's the hard way, which involves hours of discussion, tons of negotiation, half a dozen bribes, and no guarantee of success." "What's the easy way?" "Liberally placed high explosives." |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 15. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 18:37 |
DrEvil |
|
|
This comment was edited on May 2, 20:26. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 14. |
Re: No beta here :( |
May 2, 2007, 18:36 |
DrEvil |
|
|
This comment was edited on May 2, 20:26. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 13. |
Re: No subject |
May 2, 2007, 18:16 |
PointlesS |
|
|
it strikes me as ironic that people are going to complain about bad dated graphics when theres the population of a small country playing WoW.
The graphics for TR look fine if the movies and screenshots are accurate. All the major MMOG that attempt to do high end visuals end up with a stuttering mess. For instance EQ2 is still barely playable at maxed settings almost 2 years later. I concur
I'm really looking forward to this game...I can't get into current mmo games and this one seems to fix everything I hate in current mmos
This comment was edited on May 2, 18:17. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 12. |
The graphics arn't bad |
May 2, 2007, 17:24 |
Toebot |
|
|
For an MMO, adequate is good enough anyway. It does look like they borrowed some people from CoH/CoV, the texturing and lighting look similar. Given that this is primarily a PvE game, the AI better be the best in the business. Otherwise the game will last about as long as Vanguard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 11. |
graphics |
May 2, 2007, 17:11 |
the_culture |
|
|
The graphics looked pretty good to me. GPM has new screenshots and artwork: http://www.gameplaymonthly.com/screens/tabularasa.php
I don't know why people keep expecting top-of-the-line graphics in MMOs. MMOs by nature will always be a little behind because of how they're designed.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 10. |
No subject |
May 2, 2007, 16:29 |
Hump |
|
|
it strikes me as ironic that people are going to complain about bad dated graphics when theres the population of a small country playing WoW.
The graphics for TR look fine if the movies and screenshots are accurate. All the major MMOG that attempt to do high end visuals end up with a stuttering mess. For instance EQ2 is still barely playable at maxed settings almost 2 years later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am a Blues Nazi. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Both the “left” and the “right” pretend they have the answer, but they are mere flippers on the same thalidomide baby, and the truth is that neither side has a clue."
- Jim Goad |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 9. |
No subject |
May 2, 2007, 16:09 |
Cabezone |
|
|
While the graphics are obviously dated, due to the 2 year delay I imagine. The game just got out of Alpha. There's a lot of work to do yet and it's not even due out till the end of the year is it? That is a whole lot of time for some serious work to get done.
"Gun Free Zone" is Psychopath for "Soft Target" This comment was edited on May 2, 16:26. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 8. |
Here is hoping its better than Vanguard |
May 2, 2007, 15:39 |
Grounded |
|
|
at least Garriott wont sell it to sony
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 7. |
Re: No beta here :( |
May 2, 2007, 15:25 |
Fion |
|
|
Which MMORPG has good AI? I wouldn't say any of them have really good AI. Of them, City of Heroes is probably the best. In that mobs work together, buff, heal, send groups after you at a time. It's not great AI, but it's probably easily the best. Most MMOGs (and most games over-all) just have AI enough that mobs run strait at you and attack as soon as they see you. In this respect AI has barely improved since Wolfestein.
Age of Conan is supposed to have pretty good AI. AI that adapts to your fighting style or finds the hole in your defenses and vice versa. Mobs that switch up their attack style to keep you off balance. I guess you cant know for sure until you've played it lol. They are also implementing a 'needs' based AI, ala Oblivion, only less detailed apparently.
You can find info on the AI and other cool features of this highly anticipated MMOG at bymitra.com This comment was edited on May 2, 15:37. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 6. |
Re: No beta here :( |
May 2, 2007, 15:23 |
Fion |
|
|
Trust me. It sucks BAD. It's like a graphically enhanced version of Quake 2 with the AI of Extreme Paintball. I take it you've played the game. You in the beta or something? If your one of those types who goes into beta, see's an unfinished game and figure the game sucks and will suck at release to, then you don't belong in beta testing.
It looks interesting to me. UO was amazing, but who's to say if RG can pull out another MMOG success. It's not my most anticipated MMOG (that'd be Age of Conan,) but if I get into beta I'll test the shite out of it none the less.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
25 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
|
|