Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

Oblivion Expansion?

GameSpot has a story up based on a preorder listing they spotted on GameStop for an Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion expansion called Knights of the White Stallion. This was removed shortly after they contacted Bethesda Softworks for a comment on this, but they have a screenshot of the listing, showing it was for the PC platform, carrying a $19.99 MSRP and a November 21, 2006 release date. Their search for a corresponding Xbox 360 SKU yielded no results, and Bethesda declined to respond to their request for a comment.

View
72. Re: No subject Sep 15, 2006, 17:58 Versailles
 
My responsibility is not to "pay attention." My responsibility is to be entertained.

um, how can you be entertained if you're not paying attention?.....

It's hardly fair to go to the premiere of a box office hit, spend the entire time zoning out looking at your shoes/examining jr mints and thus not seeing Any of the movie, then say, "this movie didn't entertain me at all! Stupid directors! Stupid producers! Worthless actors!!!!!! And I PAID FOR THIS!!!!"

The sad thing is, based on your logic, or perhaps lack thereof, I foresee you playing the next oblivion expansion/next elder scrolls game and knowing what you know now (that using 130% chameleon ruins the game and makes it gay), you will still use 130% chameleon (or higher), then bash that game too. If you KNOW something ruins the game, DON'T DO IT! Period.


Further, if you knowingly exploit the game and purposely ruin the experience just to be an ass, why bother even buying the game? why not just have a friend buy it, ruin it, then bitch about it later, at least then you wouldn't waste any money.

It sounds as if you go out of your way to exploit flaws in games. I can imagine that if there was a game that didn't work with the 68.22 nvidia drivers, so you had to upgrade to correct the problem, you'd go out of your way to install the 68.22 drivers, bash nvidia, then bash the game developers for poor compatibility, Just for the sake of doing something you know is problematic/faulty, to point out the obvious.


Regardless, you now Know that using uber chameleon ruins the experience, so I genuinely hope that you Never plan on using it ever again, in any game, for the rest of your life. And if you do, well, then you're just a genuinely bothersome chap.

 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Sep 11, 20:21 No subject Stuart
  2. Sep 11, 20:25  Re: No subject nin
  3. Sep 11, 20:30   Re: No subject Jerykk
  4. Sep 11, 20:33    Re: No subject nin
  5. Sep 11, 20:37     Re: No subject CJ_Parker
  8. Sep 11, 20:46      Re: No subject Scottish Martial Arts
  9. Sep 11, 20:49       Re: No subject Narf2029
  10. Sep 11, 20:50        Re: No subject Jerykk
  12. Sep 11, 20:58         Re: No subject Scottish Martial Arts
  11. Sep 11, 20:51       Re: No subject Frijoles
  6. Sep 11, 20:42     Re: No subject MeatForce
  7. Sep 11, 20:44    Re: No subject Beamer
  13. Sep 11, 20:59 It's Weird... Parallax Abstraction
  16. Sep 11, 21:24  Re: It's Weird... Narf2029
  17. Sep 11, 21:39   Re: It's Weird... Jerykk
  22. Sep 11, 22:03   Re: It's Weird... Bucky
  24. Sep 11, 22:35    Re: It's Weird... nin
  19. Sep 11, 21:41  Re: It's Weird... MacD
  21. Sep 11, 21:51  Re: It's Weird... Cutter
  23. Sep 11, 22:27   Re: It's Weird... MeatForce
  14. Sep 11, 21:06 No subject space captain
  15. Sep 11, 21:19  Re: No subject captawe
  20. Sep 11, 21:46   Re: No subject MacD
  29. Sep 12, 00:40   Re: No subject Beamer
  30. Sep 12, 00:45    Re: No subject Beamer
  31. Sep 12, 01:03     Re: No subject Justin
  34. Sep 12, 02:20     Re: No subject Jerykk
  37. Sep 12, 08:31      Re: No subject Eye 4N Eye
  43. Sep 12, 10:50      Re: No subject Beamer
  44. Sep 12, 11:06       Re: No subject nin
  45. Sep 12, 11:44        Re: No subject Beamer
  47. Sep 12, 17:34       Re: No subject Jerykk
  49. Sep 12, 19:40        Re: No subject Beamer
  50. Sep 12, 19:44         Re: No subject Jerykk
  51. Sep 12, 20:31         Re: No subject Masa
  52. Sep 13, 00:30          Re: No subject Beamer
  53. Sep 13, 03:13           Re: No subject Jerykk
  54. Sep 13, 09:53            Re: No subject nin
  55. Sep 13, 11:52             Re: No subject Beamer
  56. Sep 13, 18:00              Re: No subject Jerykk
  57. Sep 13, 22:56         Re: No subject Versailles
  58. Sep 13, 23:49          Re: No subject Beamer
  59. Sep 14, 02:43           Re: No subject Jerykk
  60. Sep 14, 02:45           Re: No subject Versailles
  62. Sep 14, 09:19          Re: No subject nin
  63. Sep 14, 09:57           Re: No subject Beamer
  64. Sep 14, 10:47            Re: No subject JaZeeL
  66. Sep 14, 16:35            Re: No subject Bhruic
  67. Sep 15, 07:06            Re: No subject Versailles
  69. Sep 15, 08:36            Re: No subject Jerykk
  70. Sep 15, 12:18             Re: No subject JaZeeL
  71. Sep 15, 14:31              Re: No subject Beamer
>> 72. Sep 15, 17:58               Re: No subject Versailles
  73. Sep 15, 18:01               Re: No subject Jerykk
  74. Sep 15, 19:20                Re: No subject wasp
  75. Sep 15, 20:58                 Re: No subject Jerykk
  76. Sep 15, 21:43                  Re: No subject Bhruic
  68. Sep 15, 07:28           Re: No subject Versailles
  18. Sep 11, 21:40  Re: No subject Hump
  25. Sep 11, 22:40 No subject space captain
  26. Sep 11, 22:40 Watered Down Icewind
  27. Sep 11, 22:54  Re: Watered Down Jerykk
  28. Sep 11, 23:06  Re: Watered Down CJ_Parker
  46. Sep 12, 16:14   Re: Watered Down Icewind
  48. Sep 12, 19:31    Re: Watered Down CJ_Parker
  32. Sep 12, 01:34 Is this... Dreagon
  33. Sep 12, 02:16 No subject mag
  35. Sep 12, 02:48 I sure hope so Creston
  36. Sep 12, 02:56  Re: I sure hope so Jerykk
  38. Sep 12, 08:42  Re: I sure hope so wasp
  39. Sep 12, 09:22   No subject asrof
  40. Sep 12, 09:25 dowhaa? ^mortis^
  41. Sep 12, 10:10  Re: dowhaa? Zyrxil
  42. Sep 12, 10:48  Re: dowhaa? Beamer
  61. Sep 14, 07:01 No subject JaZeeL
  65. Sep 14, 11:51 No subject nightfend


footer

Blue's News logo