56.
 
Re: No subject
May 11, 2006, 21:00
56.
Re: No subject May 11, 2006, 21:00
May 11, 2006, 21:00
 
According to physics that makes me less dense than you.
It also makes you less diligent. The contents of your posts definitely do show you to be dense, and unlike you I am not talking about the scientific definition of the word.

That's it? <sigh>
If you want a better retort then you are going to have to do better at provoking me because I have been called a lot worse than that by a lot better than you.

However, since you were so disappointed in my dismissal of your previous attempted insult, here's a better rejoinder for it.

You love the sight of your own text you pompous ass.
Well you obviously hate the sight of yours to write such crap. And, you're not alone in that hatred.

This comment was edited on May 11, 21:54.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
2.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
3.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
4.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
5.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
6.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
7.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
8.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
9.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
10.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
11.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
12.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
13.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
     Re: No subject
14.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
      Re: No subject
15.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
       Re: No subject
16.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
      Re: No subject
17.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
       Re: No subject
18.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
19.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
20.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
21.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
       Re: No subject
22.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
23.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
24.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
25.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
28.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
29.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
          Re: No subject
33.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
           Re: No subject
34.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
            Re: No subject
42.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
            Re: No subject
59.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
           Re: No subject
30.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
27.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
35.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
        Re: No subject
36.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
39.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
          Re: No subject
41.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
           Re: No subject
47.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
            Re: No subject
43.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
           Re: No subject
44.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
            Re: No subject
45.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
             Re: No subject
46.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
             Re: No subject
48.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
              Re: No subject
51.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
               Re: No subject
 56.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
               Re: No subject
49.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
            Re: No subject
50.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
             Re: No subject
52.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
              Re: No subject
53.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
              Re: No subject
54.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
               Re: No subject
55.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
                Re: No subject
57.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
             Re: No subject
64.
May 17, 2006May 17 2006
             Re: No subject
38.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
         Re: No subject
40.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
          Re: No subject
26.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
     Re: No subject
32.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
      Re: No subject
31.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
     Re: No subject
62.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
      Re: No subject
61.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
37.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
63.
May 12, 2006May 12 2006
60.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006
58.
May 11, 2006May 11 2006