No, that demographic is not called "Men," it's a subgroup of men (and maybe a few women) who don't mind being manipulated by companies who want your money through an appeal to base desires that objectify women.
I find it extremely humorous that the women realize they are called booth babes and that's okay with them.Maybe they just don't take it as seriously as some people around here do. So they are good looking and wear a tight outfit. What precisely is wrong with that? They have the ability to turn men's heads, which is exactly why they're there. They get people's attention. They'd probably get my attention. That doesn't mean I'd buy anything or even look at a game more favorably though. Anyone that thinks that is an idiot.
Might as well call them Whore-Lites.
But I have honestly never understood why - in an internet full of actual porn - people would be interested in online booth babe galleries.jeez what is this, Blues Brokeback News?
I couldn't agree with you more !
has this been the lamest E3 of all timevery lame imo, a boring, tired, rehash of the same old dog and pony show with products that just aren't very fun or interesting or innovative.
Not only am I against objectifying women,I'm with you in principle except for that part. Using female beauty and sexuality as a marketing tool doesn't objectify women. Humans are corporeal beings, and women are sexual creatures as much as men even if they don't express it or are influenced by it in the same manner. Yes, such marketing is manipulative of men by using their own libidos against them to influence their judgement, but women aren't unwilling or uncompensated participants in such marketing and flaunting their beauty and sexuality doesn't make them objects. It makes them human.
And people like you and me...*can* make a difference there, if we refuse to be treated like fucking idiotsWhile I certainly have enough self-control and self-awareness to not let my libido cloud my judgement, that doesn't mean I can't or shouldn't appreciate the scenery. I don't see it as an either/or proposition. Companies can bait me with sexual suggestiveness all they want. I'll just take the bait and still leave them dangling if their products suck or I don't need them.
According to physics that makes me less dense than you.It also makes you less diligent. The contents of your posts definitely do show you to be dense, and unlike you I am not talking about the scientific definition of the word.
That's it? <sigh>If you want a better retort then you are going to have to do better at provoking me because I have been called a lot worse than that by a lot better than you.
You love the sight of your own text you pompous ass.Well you obviously hate the sight of yours to write such crap. And, you're not alone in that hatred.
Not only am I against objectifying women, but I resent companies thinking they can just sell me shit by flaunting some babes.
You registered after me and have more posts than me. According to physics that makes me less dense than you.
You registered after me and have more posts than me. According to physics that makes me less dense than you.
Those girls protestng should've stripped if they were trying to make a point.I think for a few benjamins they probably would have.
Oh shut up Riley. You love the sight of your own text you pompous ass.Given that you have posted on this forum about as much as I have, that is not a stone you should be throwing.