Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

GUN Backfires

BOYCOTTGUN.COM (thanks GamerGod) is a website with a call to action from the Association For American Indian Development who are looking to inspire a boycott of Activision products over GUN, the recently released shooter set in the wild west. The goal is to inspire a recall for GUN or the release of an edited version that redresses problematic depictions of Native Americans and their treatment within the game. Here's a bit:

It has come to our attention that video game publisher, Activision, has released for Xbox 360, Xbox, Playstation , PS2 and PC, a new game set in the American West with some very disturbing racist and genocidal elements toward Native Americans. The game is called "Gun" and features a frontiersman hero named Colton White. One of his earliest tasks that the game player must complete before advancing to the next level is to slaughter, not once, but on an ongoing basis, Apache Indians. Not only slaughter (and this is the terminology used in the game) but to scalp (terminology also used in the game) them as well with a "scalping knife" that can be purchased as part of the many weapons offered to the hero of the game, Colton White.

View
58. Damn history! Feb 1, 2006, 20:48 theAntiELVIS
 
All those things actually happened in the 18th and 19th centuries. Also the Native Americans actually slaughtered each other, indulged themselves in torture and the burning of captives as a form of entertainment, and used the tactic of slaughtering their enemy's children to deny them a new generation of warriors.

What the whites did to the natives was deplorable. What the natives did to each other and to the whites was deplorable, too.

Attempting to gain equality and justice in contemporary society is an honorable and laudable goal. Attempting to revise history to suit your agenda is not.

Now, the only real question is: do we want our entertainment to use these historical barbarities as fodder for a plot line? My feeling is that is a personal choice. Using censorship to enforce a personal choice or a political agenda, however, is outright social EVIL.

Decry games like GUN all you want - but organize a boycott? First of all, you will fail because the majority of people won't take part. Second you are attempting to engage in social/political censorship. This is all fine in the case of, say, boycotting the importation of goods from a nation with whom we are at war, or of a corporation or industry that is doing actual physical harm to people.

But this is a fantasy representation of an historical period. NO ONE IS ACTUALLY BEING KILLED! Get some perspective. It's no different than the whole Dan Quale/Murphy Brown fiasco.

-tAE-


 
Avatar 473
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Feb 1, 10:48 Well Beamer
  67. Feb 3, 05:34  BS! MakersMarksman
  2. Feb 1, 10:48 No subject Rain
  4. Feb 1, 10:50  Re: No subject Beamer
  5. Feb 1, 10:56   Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  6. Feb 1, 10:56   Re: No subject Vek
  7. Feb 1, 11:03    Re: No subject Beamer
  9. Feb 1, 11:12    Re: No subject HardCore
  19. Feb 1, 12:45    Re: No subject  cliffski 
  20. Feb 1, 12:58     Re: No subject Chicken
  22. Feb 1, 13:05     Re: No subject StaTik
  3. Feb 1, 10:50 huh.... xXBatmanXx
  12. Feb 1, 11:42  Re: huh.... nin
  8. Feb 1, 11:08 No subject TorTorden
  10. Feb 1, 11:28 No subject aldo_14
  13. Feb 1, 11:57  Re: No subject  Blue 
  14. Feb 1, 12:08   Re: No subject CptStern
  16. Feb 1, 12:17    Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  23. Feb 1, 13:05     Re: No subject Raven
  25. Feb 1, 13:21      Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  30. Feb 1, 13:47       Re: No subject nin
  33. Feb 1, 13:50        Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  34. Feb 1, 13:58         Re: No subject nin
  26. Feb 1, 13:22     Re: No subject skyguy
  27. Feb 1, 13:28      Re: No subject random.thought
  28. Feb 1, 13:39      Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  31. Feb 1, 13:48       Re: No subject HardCore
  40. Feb 1, 15:34     Re: No subject Tango
  41. Feb 1, 15:40      Re: No subject wtf_man
  45. Feb 1, 16:40       Re: No subject Xenopulse
  52. Feb 1, 18:12        Re: No subject Stanly Manly
  53. Feb 1, 18:26        Re: No subject Clone
  57. Feb 1, 19:47         Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  17. Feb 1, 12:22   Re: No subject Beamer
  24. Feb 1, 13:06    Re: No subject  Blue 
  43. Feb 1, 16:39   Re: No subject aldo_14
  11. Feb 1, 11:32 No subject Riley Pizt
  15. Feb 1, 12:11  Re: No subject Optimaximal
  18. Feb 1, 12:30 Names venomhed
  32. Feb 1, 13:49  Re: Names jschuur
  21. Feb 1, 13:01 Meh ledhead1969
  36. Feb 1, 14:23  Re: Meh Nick Wilson
  37. Feb 1, 14:37   Re: Meh Narf2029
  38. Feb 1, 15:06    Re: Meh Fantaz
  44. Feb 1, 16:39    Re: Meh Kxmode
  54. Feb 1, 18:50     Re: Meh Masa
  55. Feb 1, 19:22      Re: Meh Kxmode
  60. Feb 1, 21:51       Re: Meh Masa
  64. Feb 1, 23:07        Re: Meh Kxmode
  65. Feb 2, 00:07         Re: Meh MindTrigger
  61. Feb 1, 22:14       Re: Meh thane_jaw
  29. Feb 1, 13:41 just a game dj
  35. Feb 1, 13:58 No subject Masa
  39. Feb 1, 15:17 ?? Akuinnen
  42. Feb 1, 16:38 The love, hate "PC" relationship Kxmode
  46. Feb 1, 16:44 Hypocrits Kxmode
  47. Feb 1, 17:09 No subject CR0C0
  48. Feb 1, 17:30 Native Producer
  49. Feb 1, 17:41 Look at "Who's Who"... Killer Kane
  50. Feb 1, 17:54 No subject Nexus
  51. Feb 1, 18:00  Re: No subject xXBatmanXx
  56. Feb 1, 19:31 typical Bone43
>> 58. Feb 1, 20:48 Damn history! theAntiELVIS
  59. Feb 1, 21:14 The REAL reason for this news nightfend
  62. Feb 1, 22:28 I'm with the Indians Ahumado
  63. Feb 1, 22:57  Re: I'm with the Indians Masa
  66. Feb 2, 09:53  Re: I'm with the Indians xXBatmanXx


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo