 |
| 60. |
Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da |
Nov 8, 2005, 11:25 |
Warhawk |
|
|
73 - for your "worst case scenario" - there is still the option for a judge to hear the child's case and rule that the parent doesn't need to be informed. The other problem I have is that without parental involvement, places like Planned Parenthood do not get involved with the legal side of things like statutory rape, etc. If the parent doesn't know, predators of these young teenage girls also get off (pun intended) a lot more often without being held accountable.
75 - as long as the unions are in control of the process, it will never be fair to the uinion worker. They make it difficult to get the forms, they don't process the forms (one guy had to turn in the form 3 times and waited 2 years to finally save less than $1 per month - what the union told him was the amount dedicated to "political activities" - bullshit). They are often then referred to "counceling" before the forms are processed to try to intimidate them into not following through. This isn't right. The union bosses abuse and abuse this policy for political and personal gain, and it can only be reversed if they have to get permission FIRST to take the money.
76 - If revenues increase, so will the spending. Look here:
http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/bp_nov05/voter_info_pdf/entire76.pdf
What Happens If Revenues Exceed the Limit? If revenues exceed the limit, the excess amount would be divided proportionally among the General Fund and each of the state’s special funds.
The net impact of this measure on expenditures over time would depend on whether the state were able to “set aside” enough reserve funds during revenue expansions to maintain spending during periods of revenue softness. • If it were able to set aside sufficient funds, the main impact of the spending limit would be to smooth out spending over time—restraining spending during economic expansions and permitting additional spending (supported from its reserves) during revenue downturns. In terms of Figure 3, this means that enough reserves would need to be set aside during the “excess revenues” period to maintain spending at the limit during the “low revenues” period. • However, if the state were not able to accumulate large reserves, the limit would likely result in less spending over time. This is because the state would not have enough reserves available to cushion the decline in revenues during bad times. When this occurred, the reduced level of actual spending during periods of low revenues would then become the new, lower, “starting point” from which the next year’s spending limit is calculated. This could cause the spending limit to ratchet down over time. Call me crazy, but when revenues are less, spending should be less too. I like the fact that spending is limited to income. As far as school spending (and remember, my wife is a teacher), the problem we see is money isn't being spent where it is needed and spent based on formulas instead of where it really needs to go in the districts. Streamline the administration costs and let more $$$ go directly to the teachers and schools. Get rid of programs that don't work. Allow the school to be flexible in their spending to address their needs.
77 - The approval process is necessary for public input and approval of the changes being made. It is the final "check and balance" to a very, at least to now, politically driven process.
Wishing I could pay my bills like governments do Exactly the reason 76 needs to pass, unfortunately.
*** Warhawk ***
What the hell do you know...
I know it's pretty damn weird to eat people. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Have I lied to you? I mean, in this room? Trust me, leave that thing alone. - GLaDOS
Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away? - Ripley |
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Nov 7, 09:52 |
Giants |
Ray Singh |
| |
3. |
Nov 7, 11:00 |
Play Time |
MeatForce |
| |
10. |
Nov 7, 13:02 |
Re: Play Time |
complicity |
| |
11. |
Nov 7, 13:29 |
Re: Play Time |
Dan =0) |
| |
12. |
Nov 7, 14:12 |
Re: Play Time |
Mangrove |
| |
14. |
Nov 7, 14:17 |
Re: Play Time |
nin |
| |
4. |
Nov 7, 11:04 |
Rick Dangerous |
lucky shades |
| |
13. |
Nov 7, 14:15 |
Re: Giants |
Dead Man Walking |
| |
17. |
Nov 7, 15:46 |
Re: Giants |
Ray Singh |
| |
19. |
Nov 7, 16:36 |
Re: Giants |
Dead Man Walking |
| |
22. |
Nov 7, 17:42 |
Re: Giants |
Bucky |
| |
36. |
Nov 7, 19:27 |
Re: Giants |
WarPig |
| |
2. |
Nov 7, 10:59 |
Heat |
banddirector |
| |
5. |
Nov 7, 11:40 |
UserFriendly |
zincthallinide |
| |
6. |
Nov 7, 12:12 |
Craptacular. |
Zathrus |
| |
7. |
Nov 7, 12:15 |
Re: Craptacular. |
nin |
| |
9. |
Nov 7, 12:23 |
Re: Craptacular. |
Warhawk |
| |
8. |
Nov 7, 12:18 |
Re: Craptacular. |
zincthallinide |
| |
15. |
Nov 7, 14:52 |
Re: Craptacular. |
kanniballl |
| |
18. |
Nov 7, 16:08 |
Re: Craptacular. |
Ray Marden |
| |
16. |
Nov 7, 15:26 |
Family Guy's PTV Ep. Intro. |
Ant |
| |
20. |
Nov 7, 16:37 |
*sigh* |
xXBatmanXx |
| |
21. |
Nov 7, 17:18 |
Re: *sigh* |
nin |
| |
24. |
Nov 7, 17:50 |
Re: *sigh* |
xXBatmanXx |
| |
26. |
Nov 7, 17:57 |
Re: *sigh* |
nin |
| |
27. |
Nov 7, 17:57 |
Re: *sigh* |
Ray Marden |
| |
28. |
Nov 7, 17:59 |
Re: *sigh* |
nin |
| |
30. |
Nov 7, 18:04 |
Re: *sigh* |
xXBatmanXx |
| |
33. |
Nov 7, 18:20 |
Re: *sigh* |
Bucky |
| |
41. |
Nov 7, 20:50 |
Re: *sigh* |
Devster |
| |
35. |
Nov 7, 18:25 |
Re: *sigh* |
nin |
| |
31. |
Nov 7, 18:04 |
Re: *sigh* |
Enahs |
| |
32. |
Nov 7, 18:07 |
Re: *sigh* |
Ray Marden |
| |
34. |
Nov 7, 18:21 |
Re: *sigh* |
nin |
| |
38. |
Nov 7, 19:43 |
Re: *sigh* |
WarPig |
| |
39. |
Nov 7, 20:03 |
Re: *sigh* |
Bucky |
| |
40. |
Nov 7, 20:13 |
Re: *sigh* |
Tango |
| |
23. |
Nov 7, 17:48 |
But would he say... |
theAntiELVIS |
| |
25. |
Nov 7, 17:54 |
News of the day |
Warhawk |
| |
29. |
Nov 7, 18:04 |
Re: News of the day |
Ray Marden |
| |
44. |
Nov 7, 21:20 |
Re: News of the day |
Warhawk |
| |
45. |
Nov 7, 21:30 |
Re: News of the day |
xXBatmanXx |
| |
46. |
Nov 7, 21:31 |
Re: News of the day |
WarPig |
| |
47. |
Nov 7, 21:39 |
Re: News of the day |
FourPak |
| |
50. |
Nov 7, 22:13 |
Re: News of the day |
Enahs |
| |
52. |
Nov 7, 23:13 |
Re: News of the day |
WarPig |
| |
54. |
Nov 7, 23:29 |
Re: News of the day |
Enahs |
| |
53. |
Nov 7, 23:22 |
Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) |
Ray Marden |
| |
55. |
Nov 8, 00:45 |
Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) |
Warhawk |
| |
57. |
Nov 8, 01:15 |
Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) |
Ray Marden |
| >> |
60. |
Nov 8, 11:25 |
Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da |
Warhawk |
| |
58. |
Nov 8, 09:00 |
Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da |
Zathrus |
| |
37. |
Nov 7, 19:35 |
Book of the month. |
WarPig |
| |
42. |
Nov 7, 20:56 |
Games, Movies and whatnot |
Dan =0) |
| |
43. |
Nov 7, 21:13 |
Re: Games, Movies and whatnot |
nin |
| |
49. |
Nov 7, 22:09 |
Re: Games, Movies and whatnot |
Ray Marden |
| |
51. |
Nov 7, 22:59 |
Re: Games, Movies and whatnot |
Dan =0) |
| |
48. |
Nov 7, 21:47 |
Intelligent design now in judge's |
FourPak |
| |
56. |
Nov 8, 00:45 |
Minor GW News |
Dan =0) |
| |
59. |
Nov 8, 09:50 |
Re: Minor GW News |
nin |
|
|