Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Out of the Blue

MrsBlue blinked a bit in our heating standoff last night, giving in to the impulse to fire off the furnace for an extravagant half-hour or so. I don't imagine it will be much longer before we both give up on this bit of wackiness, but it's actually been sort of a fun, if a bit chilly, game.

Chilly Links! Thanks Mike Martinez and Ant.
Play: Rick Dangerous.
infect. evolve. repeat. Thanks Rizzodestructo.
Link: Home page of El Edwards, the voice of You've Got Mail. Thanks Aaron.
Old Fashioned Candy.
Stories: 'Evil' rears its head yet again. Resident Evil 3. Thanks Neutronbeam.
Burger tactics aim to shock children.
The Ultimate Star Trek Collection.
Science: 'Safe cigarette' claimed to cut cancer by 90%.
Asteroid May Yield Next Sample of Space Matter (registration required).
Taser to Offer Stun Gun Cameras.
Media: Family Guys PTV Episode Introduction. Including E1M5.
Follow-ups: The evolution of Darwin and An Evolutionist's Evolution (registration required).
Intelligent design case now in judge's hands.
Big Meteor Shower Puts on Show in Alaska.
Teh Funny: UserFriendly.

View
60. Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da Nov 8, 2005, 11:25 Warhawk
 
73 - for your "worst case scenario" - there is still the option for a judge to hear the child's case and rule that the parent doesn't need to be informed. The other problem I have is that without parental involvement, places like Planned Parenthood do not get involved with the legal side of things like statutory rape, etc. If the parent doesn't know, predators of these young teenage girls also get off (pun intended) a lot more often without being held accountable.

75 - as long as the unions are in control of the process, it will never be fair to the uinion worker. They make it difficult to get the forms, they don't process the forms (one guy had to turn in the form 3 times and waited 2 years to finally save less than $1 per month - what the union told him was the amount dedicated to "political activities" - bullshit). They are often then referred to "counceling" before the forms are processed to try to intimidate them into not following through. This isn't right. The union bosses abuse and abuse this policy for political and personal gain, and it can only be reversed if they have to get permission FIRST to take the money.

76 - If revenues increase, so will the spending. Look here:

http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/bp_nov05/voter_info_pdf/entire76.pdf

What Happens If Revenues Exceed the Limit? If
revenues exceed the limit, the excess amount would
be divided proportionally among the General Fund
and each of the state’s special funds.

The net impact of this measure on expenditures
over time would depend on whether the state were
able to “set aside” enough reserve funds during
revenue expansions to maintain spending during
periods of revenue softness.
• If it were able to set aside sufficient funds, the main
impact of the spending limit would be to smooth
out spending over time—restraining spending
during economic expansions and permitting
additional spending (supported from its reserves)
during revenue downturns. In terms of Figure 3,
this means that enough reserves would need to
be set aside during the “excess revenues” period
to maintain spending at the limit during the “low
revenues” period.
• However, if the state were not able to accumulate
large reserves, the limit would likely result in less
spending over time. This is because the state would
not have enough reserves available to cushion the
decline in revenues during bad times. When this
occurred, the reduced level of actual spending
during periods of low revenues would then become
the new, lower, “starting point” from which the next
year’s spending limit is calculated. This could cause
the spending limit to ratchet down over time.

Call me crazy, but when revenues are less, spending should be less too. I like the fact that spending is limited to income. As far as school spending (and remember, my wife is a teacher), the problem we see is money isn't being spent where it is needed and spent based on formulas instead of where it really needs to go in the districts. Streamline the administration costs and let more $$$ go directly to the teachers and schools. Get rid of programs that don't work. Allow the school to be flexible in their spending to address their needs.

77 - The approval process is necessary for public input and approval of the changes being made. It is the final "check and balance" to a very, at least to now, politically driven process.

Wishing I could pay my bills like governments do

Exactly the reason 76 needs to pass, unfortunately.

*** Warhawk ***

What the hell do you know...

I know it's pretty damn weird to eat people.
 

Have I lied to you? I mean, in this room? Trust me, leave that thing alone. - GLaDOS

Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away? - Ripley
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Nov 7, 09:52 Giants Ray Singh
  3. Nov 7, 11:00  Play Time MeatForce
  10. Nov 7, 13:02   Re: Play Time complicity
  11. Nov 7, 13:29    Re: Play Time Dan =0)
  12. Nov 7, 14:12     Re: Play Time Mangrove
  14. Nov 7, 14:17      Re: Play Time nin
  4. Nov 7, 11:04  Rick Dangerous lucky shades
  13. Nov 7, 14:15  Re: Giants Dead Man Walking
  17. Nov 7, 15:46   Re: Giants Ray Singh
  19. Nov 7, 16:36    Re: Giants Dead Man Walking
  22. Nov 7, 17:42     Re: Giants Bucky
  36. Nov 7, 19:27      Re: Giants WarPig
  2. Nov 7, 10:59 Heat banddirector
  5. Nov 7, 11:40 UserFriendly zincthallinide
  6. Nov 7, 12:12 Craptacular. Zathrus
  7. Nov 7, 12:15  Re: Craptacular. nin
  9. Nov 7, 12:23   Re: Craptacular. Warhawk
  8. Nov 7, 12:18  Re: Craptacular. zincthallinide
  15. Nov 7, 14:52  Re: Craptacular. kanniballl
  18. Nov 7, 16:08  Re: Craptacular. Ray Marden
  16. Nov 7, 15:26 Family Guy's PTV Ep. Intro. Ant
  20. Nov 7, 16:37 *sigh* xXBatmanXx
  21. Nov 7, 17:18  Re: *sigh* nin
  24. Nov 7, 17:50   Re: *sigh* xXBatmanXx
  26. Nov 7, 17:57    Re: *sigh* nin
  27. Nov 7, 17:57    Re: *sigh* Ray Marden
  28. Nov 7, 17:59     Re: *sigh* nin
  30. Nov 7, 18:04      Re: *sigh* xXBatmanXx
  33. Nov 7, 18:20       Re: *sigh* Bucky
  41. Nov 7, 20:50        Re: *sigh* Devster
  35. Nov 7, 18:25       Re: *sigh* nin
  31. Nov 7, 18:04      Re: *sigh* Enahs
  32. Nov 7, 18:07      Re: *sigh* Ray Marden
  34. Nov 7, 18:21       Re: *sigh* nin
  38. Nov 7, 19:43      Re: *sigh* WarPig
  39. Nov 7, 20:03       Re: *sigh* Bucky
  40. Nov 7, 20:13       Re: *sigh* Tango
  23. Nov 7, 17:48 But would he say... theAntiELVIS
  25. Nov 7, 17:54  News of the day Warhawk
  29. Nov 7, 18:04   Re: News of the day Ray Marden
  44. Nov 7, 21:20    Re: News of the day Warhawk
  45. Nov 7, 21:30     Re: News of the day xXBatmanXx
  46. Nov 7, 21:31     Re: News of the day WarPig
  47. Nov 7, 21:39     Re: News of the day FourPak
  50. Nov 7, 22:13      Re: News of the day Enahs
  52. Nov 7, 23:13       Re: News of the day WarPig
  54. Nov 7, 23:29        Re: News of the day Enahs
  53. Nov 7, 23:22     Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) Ray Marden
  55. Nov 8, 00:45      Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) Warhawk
  57. Nov 8, 01:15       Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the day) Ray Marden
>> 60. Nov 8, 11:25        Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da Warhawk
  58. Nov 8, 09:00       Re: Ca. election (was Re: News of the da Zathrus
  37. Nov 7, 19:35 Book of the month. WarPig
  42. Nov 7, 20:56 Games, Movies and whatnot Dan =0)
  43. Nov 7, 21:13  Re: Games, Movies and whatnot nin
  49. Nov 7, 22:09  Re: Games, Movies and whatnot Ray Marden
  51. Nov 7, 22:59   Re: Games, Movies and whatnot Dan =0)
  48. Nov 7, 21:47 Intelligent design now in judge's FourPak
  56. Nov 8, 00:45 Minor GW News Dan =0)
  59. Nov 8, 09:50  Re: Minor GW News nin


footer

Blue's News logo