& Creston. Let me know when you feel up to arguing any 1 of the points i've made. Being of course that you have the opinion I ignored your non FarCry related "point" I guess that makes you a hypocrit considering you've not replied to any of my FarCry rellated points. Being that's what this lovely thread is about and all. Technical Prowess indeed you haven't.
Fuck, and I forgot my crayons so I can't draw pictures for your dumb ass. I'll try T O - T A L K - R E A L L Y - S L O W - O K A Y ?
1) You are simply ignoring every valid point made against you by well over a dozen people right now, because you have no rebuttal for them. Is that too difficult a word? Because you're too fucking dumb to counter what they're saying, how's that?
2) So I say, you're ignoring points made against you. Also, please explain to me again how Crytek is MILKING a franchise, when they're not. Releasing crap FOR FREE is not milking a franchise. To see an example of milking a franchise, see Star Wars.
3) Your reply is "OMFGLOLOLOOKOKASFOJfAPF Teh Tehnics is not with U!!!!""LOLDOSDOSOFK
4) I talked about how Crytek is not milking the franchise, and you whine about technical aspects (which I did not mention).
5) Ergo, you ignored my point. Which is what I said you've been doing, which means YOU MADE MY POINT BY IGNORING MY POINT. Do you understand now, or shall I try to write it in retard speak for you?
Now, since you seem so convinced of your own technical 733TN355, I will happily engage you in those as well.
1) Farcry 64 bit ran only a few % slower on a 64 bit processor on 64 bit XP compared to the 32 bit version. I'm not sure if they were running the extra graphics or not, but even so, you're comparing a brand new OS to one that's had several service packs out for it already.
If we run the same test in a year or so, I'm sure there will be no performance difference between the two, or perhaps even a slight margin of improvement on the 64 bit side. Then again, farcry really doesn't use any of the benefits of 64 bit processing anyways.
Crytek simply said they'd make a 64 bit executable, and they did.
OMFGITZTHEMILK4GE!!!!
2) Tim (I believe that's who it was? Can't be bothered to look it up) said that IN HIS OPINION games ran smoother on his XP64 system. Did you ever consider that perhaps he installed XP64 clean, then started playing games, and simply noticed the benefits of a clean OS install? I think your performance can increase by 10-20% easily with a clean install. Not saying that was the case, but it's possible.
However,
3) 32 bit games can never run faster on a 64 bit OS. And why is this? So you're saying it's COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE for Microsoft to have made optimizations in their 32bit kernel / subsystem since the release of windows XP over three years ago? Yeah, you're a real technical wizard. I mean, there were no benefits to going to Windows 98 over Windows95 either, were there?
Now, please, do all of us a favor, and just go away. You're getting annoying. You're like the four year old kid stomping his foot because his mom won't buy him candy while you're standing in the middle of a home improvement store. Just stick to your side of the story, and ignore everything else, despite the fact that it proves you're wrong.
Btw, you need to email hellbinder and have him invite you over to the Taco Commander's forums. I hear they just LOVE your kind of logic over there, I'm sure you'll fit in well.
Troll.
Creston
This comment was edited on Jun 7, 10:49.