WoW Shortages

The World of Warcraft Collector's Edition on EBgames.com is now carrying a $149.99 list price, as limited supplies of Blizzard's MMORPG in stores have made the game so scarce that such gouging entrepreneurialism is possible. Thanks Voodoo Extreme.
View : : :
35.
 
Re: Bah
Jan 13, 2005, 10:01
35.
Re: Bah Jan 13, 2005, 10:01
Jan 13, 2005, 10:01
 
And I never suggested you quit at all. I've never even spoken to you before

Sigh, "we"...as in people with technical problems. Im sorry that was difficult for you to comprehend. You shouldnt suggest people quit just because they are having long term aggrevating problems and are expecting some sort of help from Blizzard.

If the two of you can play WoW and look at the official forums, TechSupport most specifically, and tell me there are not large scale problems, both technical,game balance and just general bug issues (broken instance quests are my personal favorite) then you are playing the game with blinders on. This isn't 10,000 people having issues, this is 100,000+ and on a game with a subscriber base of around 800,000.

Have either of you spent any time in the Auction House at all? It's a lag fest, almost 24/7. People are losing items and money due to database errors. You going to tell me this is only a small problem?

----------------------------------------------------
Zero Tolerance Games Counter-Strike: Source server.
http://www.ztgames.com
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
2.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
3.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
4.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
   Re: LOL
7.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
11.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
13.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
18.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
5.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
6.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
8.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
9.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
12.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
14.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
15.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
   Re: WoW
10.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
16.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
23.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
28.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
17.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
24.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
19.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
20.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
21.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
  HUH
22.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: HUH
26.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: HUH
25.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
27.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
30.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
31.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
32.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
33.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Bah
 35.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Bah
36.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
38.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
39.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Bah
40.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
50.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Bah
54.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Bah
56.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Bah
37.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
58.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
61.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
63.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
62.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
64.
Jan 15, 2005Jan 15 2005
   Re: Bah
65.
Jan 18, 2005Jan 18 2005
    Re: Bah
29.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
34.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
41.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
42.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
43.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
44.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
47.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
48.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
49.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
51.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Issues
52.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Issues
53.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Issues
55.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
57.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
59.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
45.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
46.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
60.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005