WoW Shortages

The World of Warcraft Collector's Edition on EBgames.com is now carrying a $149.99 list price, as limited supplies of Blizzard's MMORPG in stores have made the game so scarce that such gouging entrepreneurialism is possible. Thanks Voodoo Extreme.
View : : :
26.
 
Re: HUH
Jan 13, 2005, 08:35
26.
Re: HUH Jan 13, 2005, 08:35
Jan 13, 2005, 08:35
 
We are talking about WOW here not the second coming right? WOW is not that good. It's not the greatest MMORPG ever and you got to be a tool to spend that kind of money on it. A complete tool.

Uh...I don't think many people here will disagree that the CE is outrageously priced at 150 bucks, but thats EB's doing, not Blizzard's. I wouldn't spend that kind of money on it either. But it *is* the best MMORPG the *I've* ever played. Say what you want, it won't change the fact that both me and my wife are enjoying every minute of WoW. I won't challenge the issues that others are having. Sad to hear that...but I haven't run into one single problem with WoW - EDIT (ok, I haven't run into a single problem in WoW that I had to call Cust Service about or complain in forums about)

I would suspect a big reason for us loving WoW is that we really haven't played a lot of MMORPGs. I haven't yet become jaded with the genre. While MMORPG veterans may be able to see the flaws in the game, I think the average casual player may not, and can just enjoy WoW for what it is.

But yes, the "special pet" and the making of DVD don't add anything to the game...but they also don't take anything away from it either.

Just for the record, in your opinion, what IS the greatest MMORPG ever?



Spread the O&A Virus on XM Radio!
http://www.opieandanthony.com
http://www.xmradio.com
This comment was edited on Jan 13, 08:42.
Spread the O&A Virus on XM Radio Channel 202
http://www.opieandanthony.com
http://www.xmradio.com
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
2.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
3.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
4.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
   Re: LOL
7.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
11.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
13.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
18.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
5.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
6.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
8.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
9.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
12.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
14.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
15.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
   Re: WoW
10.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
16.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
23.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
28.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
17.
Jan 12, 2005Jan 12 2005
24.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
19.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
20.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
21.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
  HUH
22.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: HUH
 26.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: HUH
25.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
27.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
30.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
31.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
32.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
33.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Bah
35.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Bah
36.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
38.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
39.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Bah
40.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Bah
50.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Bah
54.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Bah
56.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Bah
37.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
58.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
61.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
63.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
   Re: Bah
62.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
64.
Jan 15, 2005Jan 15 2005
   Re: Bah
65.
Jan 18, 2005Jan 18 2005
    Re: Bah
29.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
34.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
41.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
42.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
43.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
44.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
47.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
48.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
49.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
    Re: Issues
51.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
     Re: Issues
52.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
      Re: Issues
53.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
       Re: Issues
55.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
57.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
59.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
        Re: Issues
45.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
46.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005
60.
Jan 13, 2005Jan 13 2005