Morning Q&As

[Jan 11, 2005, 11:05 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

DOOM 3: RoE
The DOOM 3: Resurrection of Evil Preview on Yahoo! Games Domain (thanks HomeLAN Fed) includes a couple of quotes from id's Marty Stratton and Matt Hooper about the upcoming DOOM 3 expansion: "We're keeping the dark, scary feel from the original. People that liked Doom 3 will like this."
Empire Earth II
GamersInfo's Empire Earth II Q&A offers a consultation with Dr. Ian Davis, the mad doc of Mad Doc software, about their upcoming RTS sequel: "There's a real subtlety to what's going on here. For instance, each region has its own set of powers and abilities, and civilizations have their own unique attributes, etc. -- these two converge to keep things fresh here. To some extent, we tried to factor in individual, unique historical events, etc. and have them add a general, broadstroke tone to the regions, civilizations, etc. At the same time, we looked at the most interesting historical pieces of each campaign, and we tried to play to that."

View

28.

Re: No subject

Jan 11, 2005, 22:37

"I'm glad almost everyone agrees that Doom3 is a pile of shit. That shows the majority of gamers still value gameplay. I thought I'd add another comment on this Doom3 tech demo - the models look stupid. I realize that doom had flaming eyeballs and demons, but they were presented in a lighthearted, satirical way. Doom3 has just silly shit slapped together and now it's supposed to scare you or shock you? Some of the worst models ever in a game and some with horribly low poly counts for such an advanced tech demo." Wow, a truly thoughtful post there. Of course those lame, generic insults can be attributed to any shooter on the market today. You're just jumping on the bandwagon and spewing out a bunch of crap about a game that doesn't deserve half the flak it gets from gamers of today. This comment was edited on Jan 11, 22:38.