 |
| 66. |
Worth the $50 easy. |
Sep 22, 2004, 03:57 |
Paranoid Jack |
|
|
Damn fun game. I have played more single player then multiplayer but can honestly say I haven't had this much fun in a few months. I feel as if I have gotten my moneys worth tonight alone.
Very good single player experience with several different modes of play to include multiplayer with bots, which has far better AI then BF1942 and the other clones.
Super fun multiplayer game. Nice maps, nice weapons, and nice vehicles... not perfect but after they balance it a bit more I think there will be a long-standing community. Hell, if people are still playing BF1942... then this game will surely be around for a year or two.
Don't believe all the negativity. So many people slam a game without even playing it long enough to learn all the nuances. Seems by the time they open the box and install the damn game they are already disappointed...
I would bet a demo is in the works. If not ask around. Most people who bought this one today are more then happy with it. A very fun single player game with great multiplayer that can only get better. One down side is the lag or netcode issue. If they patch that and tweak the gameplay a bit they have a sure thing.
EDIT: My only complaint is the shitty in-game server browser powered by Gamespy. It really sucks. Why can't these guys get a clue and go with what Joint Ops did? Now that was one sweet server browser. Maybe Gamespy expects you to use Arcade to get around the crappy in-game browser?
This comment was edited on Sep 22, 04:45. |
|
|
|
|
|
  |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Sep 21, 10:29 |
1st |
ZigZang |
| |
2. |
Sep 21, 10:31 |
Re: 1st |
Bao98 |
| |
3. |
Sep 21, 10:34 |
Re: 1st |
DDI |
| |
4. |
Sep 21, 10:39 |
I hope they're wrong... |
Paranoid Jack |
| |
5. |
Sep 21, 10:39 |
Re: 1st |
trog |
| |
8. |
Sep 21, 10:48 |
Re: 1st |
Hump |
| |
6. |
Sep 21, 10:40 |
demo |
Jim |
| |
7. |
Sep 21, 10:47 |
Re: demo |
Ihya |
| |
30. |
Sep 21, 14:31 |
Re: demo |
FourPak |
| |
31. |
Sep 21, 14:39 |
Re: demo |
Sphinx |
| |
34. |
Sep 21, 14:58 |
Re: demo |
Ant |
| |
35. |
Sep 21, 15:38 |
Re: demo |
7.62WorldOrder |
| |
36. |
Sep 21, 15:43 |
Re: demo |
nin |
| |
37. |
Sep 21, 16:36 |
Re: demo |
Hump |
| |
44. |
Sep 21, 17:22 |
Re: demo |
Ant |
| |
9. |
Sep 21, 10:54 |
Do we need another battlefield? |
Tehol |
| |
10. |
Sep 21, 10:58 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Sphinx |
| |
14. |
Sep 21, 11:37 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Hump |
| |
22. |
Sep 21, 12:42 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Bodolza |
| |
11. |
Sep 21, 11:01 |
Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
Nick Wilson |
| |
12. |
Sep 21, 11:07 |
Re: Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
Shataan |
| |
13. |
Sep 21, 11:32 |
Re: Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
sauron |
| |
15. |
Sep 21, 12:00 |
No subject |
sauron |
| |
16. |
Sep 21, 12:02 |
Re: No subject |
ExcessDan |
| |
32. |
Sep 21, 14:56 |
#15... |
Ant |
| |
17. |
Sep 21, 12:22 |
Having fun with it! |
maddog |
| |
18. |
Sep 21, 12:25 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
19. |
Sep 21, 12:34 |
Up to 16 players?! |
Jaenos |
| |
20. |
Sep 21, 12:36 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
23. |
Sep 21, 13:21 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Razor6 |
| |
29. |
Sep 21, 14:15 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Sphinx |
| |
21. |
Sep 21, 12:37 |
Re: No subject |
ZzeusS |
| |
24. |
Sep 21, 13:25 |
No subject |
fujiJuice |
| |
26. |
Sep 21, 13:31 |
Re: No subject |
maddog |
| |
28. |
Sep 21, 14:01 |
Re: No subject |
WebDemon |
| |
25. |
Sep 21, 13:30 |
good game, but frustrating |
BLaRG |
| |
27. |
Sep 21, 14:00 |
Re: good game, but frustrating |
ZzeusS |
| |
33. |
Sep 21, 14:56 |
Not that bad |
Cheese |
| |
38. |
Sep 21, 16:47 |
No subject |
DangerDog |
| |
39. |
Sep 21, 17:07 |
Ugh |
TangledThorns |
| |
40. |
Sep 21, 17:10 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
43. |
Sep 21, 17:20 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
45. |
Sep 21, 17:46 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
46. |
Sep 21, 17:50 |
Re: No subject |
Grounded |
| |
48. |
Sep 21, 17:58 |
Re: No subject |
ZigZang |
| |
41. |
Sep 21, 17:12 |
Demo |
Bao98 |
| |
42. |
Sep 21, 17:13 |
Re: Demo |
Ant |
| |
47. |
Sep 21, 17:54 |
It's selling well |
Creston |
| |
52. |
Sep 21, 18:55 |
Re: It's selling well |
Krovven |
| |
49. |
Sep 21, 18:13 |
After further play |
Cheese |
| |
50. |
Sep 21, 18:26 |
Re: After further play |
Hump |
| |
51. |
Sep 21, 18:54 |
Re: After further play |
Kevlar |
| |
53. |
Sep 21, 18:56 |
Re: After further play |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
58. |
Sep 21, 20:24 |
Re: After further play |
sponge |
| |
59. |
Sep 21, 21:06 |
Re: After further play |
Teddy |
| |
60. |
Sep 21, 21:21 |
Re: After further play |
D4rkKnight |
| |
54. |
Sep 21, 19:03 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
55. |
Sep 21, 19:21 |
Demo first please |
Tumbler |
| |
56. |
Sep 21, 19:34 |
Conquest mode |
Cheese |
| |
57. |
Sep 21, 19:49 |
shallow but fun |
Charlie_Six |
| |
61. |
Sep 21, 21:43 |
Vehicles |
Cheese |
| |
62. |
Sep 21, 23:18 |
Re: Vehicles |
captawe |
| |
63. |
Sep 21, 23:30 |
No subject |
WebDemon |
| |
64. |
Sep 21, 23:49 |
Re: No subject |
Teddy |
| |
65. |
Sep 21, 23:54 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| >> |
66. |
Sep 22, 03:57 |
Worth the $50 easy. |
Paranoid Jack |
| |
67. |
Sep 22, 08:18 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
68. |
Sep 22, 08:47 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
69. |
Sep 22, 10:00 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
z0dd |
| |
71. |
Sep 22, 12:33 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Tumbler |
| |
76. |
Sep 23, 12:44 |
Re: Vehicles |
Rilus |
| |
77. |
Sep 23, 19:35 |
Re: Vehicles |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
78. |
Sep 24, 16:26 |
Re: Vehicles |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
79. |
Sep 24, 23:08 |
Re: Vehicles |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
70. |
Sep 22, 10:14 |
:-\ |
dorian |
| |
72. |
Sep 22, 12:35 |
Re: :-\ |
bizarro |
| |
73. |
Sep 22, 14:03 |
LucasArts' TS replied on demo... |
Ant |
| |
74. |
Sep 22, 19:22 |
Some more... |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
75. |
Sep 23, 00:44 |
Re: Some more... |
Animals for Crackers |
|
|
Twitter 
