 |
| 28. |
Re: No subject |
Sep 21, 2004, 14:01 |
WebDemon |
|
|
It's got it's good and it's bad. Good=Star Wars Bad=everything else in the game. Overall it's amazingly craptastic. It's looks nice but nothing special, the AI is even stupider that BF1942's which is hard to believe, and the vehicle control on some vehicles is bleh. Damn shame too, I couldn't wait to rain fire and brimstone with an AT/AT on Hoth, instead I ended up bored silly. The console whores will probably love it becuase they don't have 500 shooters to compare it with but as for it being good on the PC, well no. Stick to Battlefield, play the SW mod for UT2K4, and hope that they continue to improve the Galactic Conquest mod for BF1942. It has potential to be awsome mind you, provided A LOT of tweaking is done but I gotta say to you all pass on this one. I hereby declare Just another example of Lucas milking the Star Wars cash cow again to coincide with the release of his newly ruined original trilogy.
This comment was edited on Sep 21, 14:11. |
|
|
|
|
|
  |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Sep 21, 10:29 |
1st |
ZigZang |
| |
2. |
Sep 21, 10:31 |
Re: 1st |
Bao98 |
| |
3. |
Sep 21, 10:34 |
Re: 1st |
DDI |
| |
4. |
Sep 21, 10:39 |
I hope they're wrong... |
Paranoid Jack |
| |
5. |
Sep 21, 10:39 |
Re: 1st |
trog |
| |
8. |
Sep 21, 10:48 |
Re: 1st |
Hump |
| |
6. |
Sep 21, 10:40 |
demo |
Jim |
| |
7. |
Sep 21, 10:47 |
Re: demo |
Ihya |
| |
30. |
Sep 21, 14:31 |
Re: demo |
FourPak |
| |
31. |
Sep 21, 14:39 |
Re: demo |
Sphinx |
| |
34. |
Sep 21, 14:58 |
Re: demo |
Ant |
| |
35. |
Sep 21, 15:38 |
Re: demo |
7.62WorldOrder |
| |
36. |
Sep 21, 15:43 |
Re: demo |
nin |
| |
37. |
Sep 21, 16:36 |
Re: demo |
Hump |
| |
44. |
Sep 21, 17:22 |
Re: demo |
Ant |
| |
9. |
Sep 21, 10:54 |
Do we need another battlefield? |
Tehol |
| |
10. |
Sep 21, 10:58 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Sphinx |
| |
14. |
Sep 21, 11:37 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Hump |
| |
22. |
Sep 21, 12:42 |
Re: Do we need another battlefield? |
Bodolza |
| |
11. |
Sep 21, 11:01 |
Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
Nick Wilson |
| |
12. |
Sep 21, 11:07 |
Re: Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
Shataan |
| |
13. |
Sep 21, 11:32 |
Re: Crappy Battlefield knockoff |
sauron |
| |
15. |
Sep 21, 12:00 |
No subject |
sauron |
| |
16. |
Sep 21, 12:02 |
Re: No subject |
ExcessDan |
| |
32. |
Sep 21, 14:56 |
#15... |
Ant |
| |
17. |
Sep 21, 12:22 |
Having fun with it! |
maddog |
| |
18. |
Sep 21, 12:25 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
19. |
Sep 21, 12:34 |
Up to 16 players?! |
Jaenos |
| |
20. |
Sep 21, 12:36 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
23. |
Sep 21, 13:21 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Razor6 |
| |
29. |
Sep 21, 14:15 |
Re: Up to 16 players?! |
Sphinx |
| |
21. |
Sep 21, 12:37 |
Re: No subject |
ZzeusS |
| |
24. |
Sep 21, 13:25 |
No subject |
fujiJuice |
| |
26. |
Sep 21, 13:31 |
Re: No subject |
maddog |
| >> |
28. |
Sep 21, 14:01 |
Re: No subject |
WebDemon |
| |
25. |
Sep 21, 13:30 |
good game, but frustrating |
BLaRG |
| |
27. |
Sep 21, 14:00 |
Re: good game, but frustrating |
ZzeusS |
| |
33. |
Sep 21, 14:56 |
Not that bad |
Cheese |
| |
38. |
Sep 21, 16:47 |
No subject |
DangerDog |
| |
39. |
Sep 21, 17:07 |
Ugh |
TangledThorns |
| |
40. |
Sep 21, 17:10 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
43. |
Sep 21, 17:20 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
45. |
Sep 21, 17:46 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
46. |
Sep 21, 17:50 |
Re: No subject |
Grounded |
| |
48. |
Sep 21, 17:58 |
Re: No subject |
ZigZang |
| |
41. |
Sep 21, 17:12 |
Demo |
Bao98 |
| |
42. |
Sep 21, 17:13 |
Re: Demo |
Ant |
| |
47. |
Sep 21, 17:54 |
It's selling well |
Creston |
| |
52. |
Sep 21, 18:55 |
Re: It's selling well |
Krovven |
| |
49. |
Sep 21, 18:13 |
After further play |
Cheese |
| |
50. |
Sep 21, 18:26 |
Re: After further play |
Hump |
| |
51. |
Sep 21, 18:54 |
Re: After further play |
Kevlar |
| |
53. |
Sep 21, 18:56 |
Re: After further play |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
58. |
Sep 21, 20:24 |
Re: After further play |
sponge |
| |
59. |
Sep 21, 21:06 |
Re: After further play |
Teddy |
| |
60. |
Sep 21, 21:21 |
Re: After further play |
D4rkKnight |
| |
54. |
Sep 21, 19:03 |
No subject |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
55. |
Sep 21, 19:21 |
Demo first please |
Tumbler |
| |
56. |
Sep 21, 19:34 |
Conquest mode |
Cheese |
| |
57. |
Sep 21, 19:49 |
shallow but fun |
Charlie_Six |
| |
61. |
Sep 21, 21:43 |
Vehicles |
Cheese |
| |
62. |
Sep 21, 23:18 |
Re: Vehicles |
captawe |
| |
63. |
Sep 21, 23:30 |
No subject |
WebDemon |
| |
64. |
Sep 21, 23:49 |
Re: No subject |
Teddy |
| |
65. |
Sep 21, 23:54 |
Re: No subject |
Krovven |
| |
66. |
Sep 22, 03:57 |
Worth the $50 easy. |
Paranoid Jack |
| |
67. |
Sep 22, 08:18 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
68. |
Sep 22, 08:47 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
69. |
Sep 22, 10:00 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
z0dd |
| |
71. |
Sep 22, 12:33 |
Re: Worth the $50 easy. |
Tumbler |
| |
76. |
Sep 23, 12:44 |
Re: Vehicles |
Rilus |
| |
77. |
Sep 23, 19:35 |
Re: Vehicles |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
78. |
Sep 24, 16:26 |
Re: Vehicles |
Animals for Crackers |
| |
79. |
Sep 24, 23:08 |
Re: Vehicles |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
70. |
Sep 22, 10:14 |
:-\ |
dorian |
| |
72. |
Sep 22, 12:35 |
Re: :-\ |
bizarro |
| |
73. |
Sep 22, 14:03 |
LucasArts' TS replied on demo... |
Ant |
| |
74. |
Sep 22, 19:22 |
Some more... |
Muscular Beaver |
| |
75. |
Sep 23, 00:44 |
Re: Some more... |
Animals for Crackers |
|
|
Twitter 
