Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Out of the Blue

I had along-overdue visit with the eye doctor yesterday, though it turns out my glasses prescription hasn't changed (I'm nearsighted), so the delay was of no consequence. I forgot, however, to try to satisfy my curiosity when he asked me if I had any questions, because I wanted to ask him his thoughts on that LASER eye surgery (I'm guessing he gets that a lot). I will follow-up with him on this directly soon enough, but I decided to lay some groundwork on the web... searching for "LASER eye surgery problems" (naturally the aspect of this I am most curious about) turned up enough of an abundance of results to turn anyone off to the prospect. A more refined search for "Custom LASIK problems" was much less pessimistic, though, with the majority of hits from eye doctor sites discussing potential complications. Along the way I learned that the Custom LASIK is also capable of coping with astigmatisms too (though mine is considered quite mild to start with), so it's possible I'm a candidate for this. At this point I admit to still being a bit doubtful about all this... I'm not much of a gambler, and I'm reluctant to risk my vision in order to take the chance on improving it, but I am still tugged by curiosity, so if anyone has any links or information about the pros and cons of this procedure, I'd be very interested.

Links of the Day: An Analysis of Netflix's DVD Allocation System. Thanks Bronco.
By Popular Demand: Eyeball jewelry new fashion trend. Thanks all one million of you.
Stories of the Day: Actors Whip Easter Bunny at Church Show. Thanks Halsy.
Man to bet all on Vegas roulette spin.
The forgotten story behind IBM's 'first mainframe'.
Science!: Dangerous space rocks under watch.
Media of the Day: Spider-Man 2 Trailer. Thanks Ant.
Thanks Mike Martinez

View
146. Re: No subject Apr 13, 2004, 17:39 Moog Operator
 
"It's kind of sad how little of them involved anything of relevance" All of them had relevant points, you chose to ignore them all, or label the person a "cultural-marxist" or a "liberal" or a "leftist" then ignore them.

"Americans are suckers who are content to get their history from the television" Not only do you demonstrate clearly that this is the truth through action/typing, but you also got your panic reactions from the idiot box. OH NO, GAY ARE MARRYING, THE DOG FUCKERS ARE NEXT!!!

"Animals don't have rights". You say this, but then cite animals whose recent evolution centered around symbiosis with humans or have been totally hijacked by humans for our purposes. Maybe they do not have rights in the sense that humans do, but penetrating a dogs ass with your dick is a pretty far cry from developing a human-enabled symbiosis with an animal.


"Nah, you cite it, the burden of proof is on you". Willful ignorance of facts does not negate them.


"so I don't see the point of the "criminalizing it doesn't stop it" argument" What, 4 million people smoke pot daily in the states? The point of the argument (which had nothing to do with your brickwitted comments) is that moral legislation is pointless in a society which is by nature immoral. Common sense legislation, like, don't kill humans or you go to jail, isn't being trampled upon by millions of Americans who do not believe in the law. Juxtaposing the two is not a sensical argument at all, as moral law makes to strip freedoms, which in most cases are not infringing upon others'. Common sense law is just that.

Unlike anti-homo bigotry, I have every reason to condemn the actions of Christians, which have caused human civilization across the planet immeasurable harm, and continue to attempt to do so. Homos, blacks, etc. have not been traipsing around the planet fucking over generations of humanity, and rewriting history for the last 2000 years. If I started dishing on blacks, or fags, like you, I would be getting an earful. I attack ignorance in all it's forms, including yours. I would leave Christians alone happily if they'd fuck off and stop trying to inflict their bullshit unto others.

Again, you try to bundle all of us into some leftist pile, which is not the case. I am a conservative. I want the federal government to fuck off, just like you, except, instead of whining like a child who can't share over income tax, I busy myself coming up with actual solutions to this bullshit.


The companies will be very pleased.
This comment was edited on Apr 13, 17:42.
 
STAY RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE, GET OUT OF THAT BED AND GET DOWN ON THE FLOOR, GET OUTSIDE RIGHT NOW, RIGHT HERE: GET DOWN ON THE CEMENT, I DONT CARE IF YOU'RE NUDE, GET DOWN ON THE CEMENT, I DON'T CARE IF ITS FREEZING! WHERES THE DRUGS, WE KNOW YOU GOT THE DRU
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Apr 9, 10:32 LASIK VogelAP
  2. Apr 9, 10:41  Re: LASIK nin
  5. Apr 9, 11:04   Re: LASIK Sphinx
  23. Apr 9, 14:31  Re: LASIK Wraithiis
  44. Apr 9, 22:10  removed langles
  3. Apr 9, 11:00 Uh, hello? PoopStewart
  25. Apr 9, 15:01  Re: Uh, hello? ExcessDan
  4. Apr 9, 11:02 Vision Bronco
  24. Apr 9, 14:40  Re: Vision Dr.Del
  6. Apr 9, 11:15 lasik jeremiah
  7. Apr 9, 11:39  Re: lasik Scottish Martial Arts
  8. Apr 9, 11:39  Re: lasik ZzeusS
  10. Apr 9, 12:09   Re: lasik Devster
  9. Apr 9, 11:48 The most important thing zakk
  11. Apr 9, 12:24 My own 2 cents Tooon
  12. Apr 9, 12:32 LASIK N
  13. Apr 9, 12:52 Get it! Mullen
  14. Apr 9, 12:54 Spider-Man 2 Bunko
  15. Apr 9, 13:02 Damn you LAZTEK! Fausticle
  16. Apr 9, 13:20 Risk Analysis unaloony
  17. Apr 9, 13:32 lazik j.c.f.
  18. Apr 9, 13:38 LASIK WebDemon
  19. Apr 9, 13:44 I thought about it also... Mr. Tact
  20. Apr 9, 13:53 Contacts? Smoove
  21. Apr 9, 14:15 Not for normal use? Mr. Tact
  22. Apr 9, 14:28  Re: Not for normal use? Earthworm
  32. Apr 9, 18:03  Re: Not for normal use? WaltC
  33. Apr 9, 18:29   Re: Not for normal use? Bunko
  40. Apr 9, 21:31    Re: Not for normal use? complicity
  51. Apr 10, 02:06     Re: Not for normal use? Zathrus
  26. Apr 9, 16:04 Lasik Creston
  28. Apr 9, 17:03  Re: Lasik Enahs
  29. Apr 9, 17:34   Re: Lasik nin
  41. Apr 9, 21:39   Re: Lasik Ray Marden
  47. Apr 10, 00:02    Re: Lasik Bronco
  48. Apr 10, 00:29     Re: Lasik amygdala
  61. Apr 10, 14:40      Re: Lasik HoSpanky
  52. Apr 10, 02:10     Re: Lasik Ray Marden
  53. Apr 10, 03:38      Re: Lasik bkg
  55. Apr 10, 11:04    Re: Lasik Enahs
  30. Apr 9, 17:34  Re: Lasik Bunko
  31. Apr 9, 17:53  Re: Lasik Enahs
  36. Apr 9, 20:23   Re: Lasik WarPig
  37. Apr 9, 21:10    Re: Lasik Bronco
  54. Apr 10, 04:53     Re: Lasik WarPig
  38. Apr 9, 21:13    Re: Lasik Halsy
  27. Apr 9, 16:06 Lasik Plus Spampire
  34. Apr 9, 18:37 Some different feedback trog
  56. Apr 10, 11:30  Re: Some different feedback Patrick
  63. Apr 10, 15:32   Re: Some different feedback Dr.Del
  35. Apr 9, 18:54 Come on... Halsy
  39. Apr 9, 21:24 My real issue... Ray Marden
  42. Apr 9, 22:01 Laser Eye Surgery BigSugar
  43. Apr 9, 22:09 Bunny Whuppins BigSugar
  45. Apr 9, 22:42 What amazes me Creston
  46. Apr 9, 23:34 some thoughts halo
  49. Apr 10, 01:33 Highly recommend Lasik babar
  50. Apr 10, 01:56 LASIK Squelch Oil
  57. Apr 10, 14:01 ... Bunko
  58. Apr 10, 14:17  Re: ... JediLuke
  59. Apr 10, 14:21  Re: ... Morlock
  60. Apr 10, 14:34   Re: ... Bunko
  62. Apr 10, 15:00    Re: ... Enahs
  64. Apr 10, 15:48   Re: ... Halsy
  66. Apr 10, 16:41    Re: ... Morlock
  67. Apr 10, 16:57     Re: ... Morlock
  70. Apr 10, 18:11     Re: ... Bunko
  72. Apr 10, 18:59      Re: ... Morlock
  73. Apr 10, 19:07       Re: ... Dantastic
  74. Apr 10, 19:28        Re: ... Morlock
  75. Apr 10, 19:36         Re: ... Dantastic
  77. Apr 10, 19:41          Re: ... Morlock
  78. Apr 10, 20:24           Re: ... Dantastic
  79. Apr 10, 21:13           Re: ... JoeCool
  76. Apr 10, 19:40       Re: ... Morlock
  80. Apr 10, 21:14       Re: ... JediLuke
  81. Apr 10, 23:25        Re: ... Morlock
  82. Apr 10, 23:46         Re: ... JediLuke
  83. Apr 11, 00:16          Re: ... Morlock
  84. Apr 11, 00:27           Re: ... JediLuke
  85. Apr 11, 00:42            Re: ... Morlock
  86. Apr 11, 00:48             Re: ... JediLuke
  87. Apr 11, 00:58              Re: ... Morlock
  88. Apr 11, 01:07               Re: ... JediLuke
  90. Apr 11, 01:26                Re: ... Morlock
  92. Apr 11, 01:32                 Re: ... JediLuke
  97. Apr 11, 02:00                  Re: ... Morlock
  98. Apr 11, 02:11                   Re: ... JediLuke
  101. Apr 11, 02:21                   Re: ... Ray Marden
  103. Apr 11, 02:23                    Re: ... JediLuke
  89. Apr 11, 01:21               Re: ... complicity
  91. Apr 11, 01:31                Re: ... Morlock
  93. Apr 11, 01:42                 Re: ... complicity
  95. Apr 11, 01:44                  Re: ... JediLuke
  96. Apr 11, 01:56                   Re: ... complicity
  99. Apr 11, 02:13                  Re: ... Morlock
  100. Apr 11, 02:19                   Re: ... JediLuke
  104. Apr 11, 02:36                   Re: ... complicity
  112. Apr 11, 15:31                    Re: ... Morlock
  113. Apr 11, 16:13                     Re: ... JediLuke
  114. Apr 11, 22:41                      Re: ... JoeCool
  116. Apr 12, 01:03                       Re: ... Morlock
  117. Apr 12, 01:08                        Re: ... JediLuke
  119. Apr 12, 14:54                        Holy Crap Moog Operator
  120. Apr 12, 15:24                         Re: Holy Crap JediLuke
  121. Apr 12, 15:37                          Re: Holy Crap Moog Operator
  122. Apr 12, 15:52                           Re: Holy Crap JediLuke
  123. Apr 12, 15:59                          Re: Holy Crap JoeCool
  124. Apr 12, 16:03                           Re: Holy Crap Moog Operator
  125. Apr 12, 16:16                           Re: Holy Crap JediLuke
  126. Apr 12, 16:21                            Re: Holy Crap JoeCool
  127. Apr 12, 19:50                             No subject Morlock
  128. Apr 12, 20:48                              Re: No subject JediLuke
  129. Apr 12, 23:12                               Re: No subject JediLuke
  131. Apr 13, 10:11                                Re: No subject Moog Operator
  115. Apr 11, 22:42                     Re: ... JoeCool
  110. Apr 11, 02:59                 Re: ... Zathrus
  65. Apr 10, 16:16  Re: ... HIGH_PING
  68. Apr 10, 17:18   Re: ... nin
  69. Apr 10, 17:37    Re: ... Morlock
  94. Apr 11, 01:44  Re: ... Ray Marden
  102. Apr 11, 02:23   Re: ... Morlock
  105. Apr 11, 02:38    Re: ... Morlock
  106. Apr 11, 02:43     Re: ... JediLuke
  107. Apr 11, 02:52      Re: ... Morlock
  111. Apr 11, 02:59       Re: ... complicity
  108. Apr 11, 02:53     Re: ... complicity
  109. Apr 11, 02:57      Re: ... JediLuke
  118. Apr 12, 12:36     I love trolls, especially bigots Moog Operator
  71. Apr 10, 18:52 The status of this thread... Dantastic
  130. Apr 13, 09:33 $0.02 Tango
  132. Apr 13, 10:44  Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  133. Apr 13, 11:13   Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  137. Apr 13, 12:20    Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  138. Apr 13, 12:48     Re: $0.02 Tango
  139. Apr 13, 12:57     Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  140. Apr 13, 13:35     Re: $0.02 Moog Operator
  141. Apr 13, 15:06      Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  164. Apr 14, 16:59      Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  166. Apr 14, 17:26       Re: $0.02 Tango
  167. Apr 14, 17:33       Re: $0.02 Moog Operator
  168. Apr 14, 18:36        Re: $0.02 Morlock
  169. Apr 15, 07:47         Re: $0.02 Tango
  173. Apr 15, 13:41          Re: $0.02 Morlock
  174. Apr 15, 13:54           Re: $0.02 nin
  175. Apr 15, 14:05            Re: $0.02 Morlock
  176. Apr 15, 14:57             Re: $0.02 Tango
  170. Apr 15, 12:26        Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  171. Apr 15, 13:03         Re: $0.02 Tango
  172. Apr 15, 13:05         Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  177. Apr 15, 15:32         Re: $0.02 Moog Operator
  178. Apr 15, 18:20          Re: $0.02 Morlock
  179. Apr 15, 20:10           Re: $0.02 Tango
  180. Apr 15, 20:46            Re: $0.02 Morlock
  181. Apr 15, 22:35             Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  183. Apr 16, 08:29              Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  185. Apr 16, 13:32               Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  188. Apr 17, 12:30                Re: $0.02 bangersnmash
  189. Apr 17, 14:19                 Re: $0.02 Morlock
  190. Apr 17, 14:33                  Re: $0.02 Morlock
  191. Apr 17, 20:49                 Re: $0.02 Tango
  182. Apr 16, 07:16             Re: $0.02 Tango
  186. Apr 16, 15:50              Re: $0.02 Morlock
  187. Apr 16, 20:02               Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  184. Apr 16, 10:51           Re: $0.02 Moog Operator
  134. Apr 13, 11:20   Re: $0.02 Moog Operator
  135. Apr 13, 11:26    Re: $0.02 nin
  136. Apr 13, 11:29     Re: $0.02 JediLuke
  142. Apr 13, 15:17      Re: $0.02 Bronco
  143. Apr 13, 16:21       No subject Morlock
  144. Apr 13, 16:38        Re: No subject JediLuke
  145. Apr 13, 17:06        Re: No subject Tango
>> 146. Apr 13, 17:39        Re: No subject Moog Operator
  147. Apr 13, 19:33 Re: redefining marriage AirWreck
  148. Apr 13, 19:38  Re: redefining marriage JediLuke
  149. Apr 13, 23:05  Re: redefining marriage Morlock
  150. Apr 13, 23:38   Re: redefining marriage JediLuke
  151. Apr 14, 08:01   Re: redefining marriage Tango
  152. Apr 14, 10:51    Re: redefining marriage Moog Operator
  153. Apr 14, 10:56     Re: redefining marriage Moog Operator
  154. Apr 14, 14:10    Re: redefining marriage Morlock
  155. Apr 14, 14:46     Re: redefining marriage JediLuke
  156. Apr 14, 15:01     Re: redefining marriage Moog Operator
  157. Apr 14, 15:15      Re: redefining marriage JediLuke
  158. Apr 14, 15:28      Re: redefining marriage Morlock
  159. Apr 14, 15:41       Re: redefining marriage Moog Operator
  160. Apr 14, 15:42       Re: redefining marriage Tango
  161. Apr 14, 16:19        Re: redefining marriage Morlock
  162. Apr 14, 16:35         Re: redefining marriage JediLuke
  163. Apr 14, 16:45         Re: redefining marriage Tango
  165. Apr 14, 17:19         Re: redefining marriage Moog Operator


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo