|
|
 |
| [Dec 22, 2003, 12:53 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
In a turn of events that harkens back to the controversial release of the
original Battlecruiser game, the Battlecruiser
Online Forums now have more on the brewing disagreement between 3000AD
developer Derek Smart and publisher DreamCatcher Interactive over whether
Universal Combat is ready for prime time. There is a conflict over the
possibility that RC1 of the game will be shipped, and this all may end up in the
courts. Here's a bit: Today, Eric and my attorneys in Canada are going to
advise them via paperwork of their breach and my desire to protect my IP from
damage and at any/all costs. Obtaining a TRO is not a big deal because my
contract shows that I own the IP, that my company, rep, IP etc would be damaged
if this RC1 build were to be allowed into the retail channel. With a TRO (which
for expediatry reasons has to be taken out in Canada), they can replicate a
million units, but will never ship them. And since a TRO requires a hearing in
order to either (a) have it removed of (b) have it extended, if successful, the
RC1 build will never enter the retail channel until the case is heard. Which
could be 3-4 weeks, depending on the Canadian court system.
 |
| 52. |
Re: No subject |
Dec 22, 2003, 23:43 |
Tigger |
|
|
What's sad is the total lack of professionalism by dragging this tripe in to his forums and making it public.
Well said.
-- Tigger "It's not the years, it's the mileage" ~Indiana Jones |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
-- Tigger Vic Fontaine for President |
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Dec 22, 11:55 |
No subject |
nin |
| |
2. |
Dec 22, 12:03 |
Derek Smart |
amygdala |
| |
3. |
Dec 22, 12:03 |
Re: No subject |
Commando |
| |
11. |
Dec 22, 12:36 |
Re: No subject |
nin |
| |
4. |
Dec 22, 12:03 |
Re: No subject |
AtomicFishyStick |
| |
5. |
Dec 22, 12:04 |
Re: No subject |
Enahs |
| |
6. |
Dec 22, 12:11 |
Re: No subject |
EvilGoof_Trollboy |
| |
7. |
Dec 22, 12:12 |
and so it begins...... |
Hump |
| |
8. |
Dec 22, 12:13 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
Gandhi |
| |
9. |
Dec 22, 12:16 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
Bronco |
| |
10. |
Dec 22, 12:22 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
Scottish Martial Arts |
| |
12. |
Dec 22, 12:46 |
A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Paranoid Jack |
| |
23. |
Dec 22, 13:40 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Michael Bolton's hair dresser |
| |
24. |
Dec 22, 13:42 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
nin |
| |
25. |
Dec 22, 13:47 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Rigs |
| |
32. |
Dec 22, 14:53 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Enahs |
| |
33. |
Dec 22, 15:28 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Frijoles |
| |
36. |
Dec 22, 16:23 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Tigger |
| |
38. |
Dec 22, 16:31 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Hump |
| |
39. |
Dec 22, 16:49 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Gandhi |
| |
40. |
Dec 22, 17:18 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
nin |
| |
26. |
Dec 22, 13:52 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
nin |
| |
27. |
Dec 22, 13:52 |
Re: A Time Of Good Cheer? |
Sty |
| |
14. |
Dec 22, 12:49 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
rkone |
| |
41. |
Dec 22, 17:41 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
Moog Operator |
| |
48. |
Dec 22, 20:55 |
Re: and so it begins...... |
eunichron |
| |
13. |
Dec 22, 12:46 |
No subject |
Michael Bolton's hair dresser |
| |
16. |
Dec 22, 13:08 |
Re: No subject |
Hellbinder |
| |
18. |
Dec 22, 13:12 |
Re: No subject |
rkone |
| |
19. |
Dec 22, 13:16 |
Re: No subject |
Michael Bolton's hair dresser |
| |
22. |
Dec 22, 13:30 |
Re: No subject |
Scottish Martial Arts |
| |
15. |
Dec 22, 13:07 |
No subject |
Pie4Foo |
| |
17. |
Dec 22, 13:12 |
Re: No subject |
Hellbinder |
| |
20. |
Dec 22, 13:19 |
Re: No subject |
Rigs |
| |
21. |
Dec 22, 13:22 |
Re: No subject |
Rigs |
| |
35. |
Dec 22, 16:10 |
Re: No subject |
Pie4Foo |
| |
37. |
Dec 22, 16:27 |
Re: No subject |
Headfake |
| |
28. |
Dec 22, 14:04 |
No subject |
space captain |
| |
29. |
Dec 22, 14:06 |
Re: No subject |
EvilGoof_Trollboy |
| |
30. |
Dec 22, 14:20 |
Re: No subject |
Overon |
| |
31. |
Dec 22, 14:31 |
go back to the drawing board |
space captain |
| |
34. |
Dec 22, 15:45 |
No subject |
D4rkKnight |
| |
42. |
Dec 22, 19:25 |
did you know? |
space captain |
| |
43. |
Dec 22, 19:29 |
Re: did you know? |
Ibbz |
| |
44. |
Dec 22, 19:32 |
Re: did you know? |
ZzeusS |
| |
45. |
Dec 22, 19:55 |
Re: did you know? |
Hump |
| |
46. |
Dec 22, 20:06 |
Re: did you know? |
DedEye |
| |
47. |
Dec 22, 20:44 |
Cool trick but does it work? |
SamPenguin |
| |
49. |
Dec 22, 21:15 |
No subject |
space captain |
| |
50. |
Dec 22, 22:39 |
Re: No subject |
markv |
| >> |
52. |
Dec 22, 23:43 |
Re: No subject |
Tigger |
| |
51. |
Dec 22, 23:02 |
No subject |
B M |
| |
53. |
Dec 23, 00:13 |
Derek Smart |
the_nemesis |
| |
54. |
Dec 23, 00:33 |
Re: Derek Smart |
Mad Max RW |
| |
55. |
Dec 23, 04:20 |
No subject |
EvilGoof_Trollboy |
| |
57. |
Dec 23, 10:23 |
Re: No subject |
eunichron |
| |
58. |
Dec 23, 10:37 |
Re: No subject |
Tigger |
| |
60. |
Dec 23, 10:44 |
Re: No subject |
eunichron |
| |
56. |
Dec 23, 09:49 |
No subject |
space captain |
| |
59. |
Dec 23, 10:39 |
Re: No subject |
Tigger |
| |
61. |
Dec 23, 10:53 |
No subject |
space captain |
| |
62. |
Dec 23, 11:15 |
Re: No subject |
Tigger |
| |
63. |
Dec 23, 16:53 |
Re: No subject |
strangelove |
|
|
|