Black Isle, Fallout 3 Dead

More bad news at Black Isle Studios, where lead designer J.E. Sawyer resigned just last month (story), as Farewell, but not goodbye on the Interplay Entertainment Forums (thanks Nels Nelson) is a post from Damien "Puuk" Foletto that indicates that the studio is now shut down, referring to today as his "last day at the (former) BIS." This follows suit with a note sent along by designer John Deiley:
Today marks the end of an era. Black Isle Studios is no more. In yet another sweeping layoff of employees, Interplay has officially let go the last of it's Black Isle employees (save two that I know of) and dissolved the division. Also, the non-announced title that the division was working on, Fallout 3, has been "shelved" to quote management.
View : : :
89.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 9, 2003, 19:42
89.
Re: No subject Dec 9, 2003, 19:42
Dec 9, 2003, 19:42
 
I've had these conversations many times, and the reality is that most people don't have the time or interest in spending more than 20 hours on a game. Think about how much free time you have when you are working full time, have family responsibilities, etc. Fifty hour epic games just aren't realistic.

I think that's just hot air people blow up to not have to face the fact that their attention spans are below that of a five year old.
I work, I'm married, yet I have the time, and find the time to play games. Obviously, games are most likely a much bigger factor in my life than they are in that of the casual gamer, but even so, I fail to see WHY a game has to be short enough that "The Average Gamer", with his attention span that's just long enough to watch Britney wiggle her way out of another dress, can finish it in a week.

A friend of mine, just as big a gamer as I am, has far less free time to spend on games than I do. He buys a game, then spends his next five or six weeks just playing that game.

It has nothing to do with lack of time, it has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that society and people in general are getting dumber than fuck, need their entertainment spoonfed to them (look up some numbers for book sales...), and get bored with ANYTHING within five minutes. In ten years time, if developers keep adhering to this kind of stereotype as "The standard for gaming", we'll have videogames that last five fucking minutes (which is about how long kids in my wife's classes can manage to listen before they start whining how they're bored etc.)

I will agree that ignoring the console market is stupid for a developer, since there is a LOT more money to be made in it.
However, there are several ways to "do it".

1) Bioware. KotOR on Xbox, redone for the PC. Still has throwbacks to the Xbox controls, but it works on the PC, and looks a BILLION times better on PC, 1600x1200, FSAA, better sound etc.

2) Ion Storm. Make the exact same game, fucked up controls, looks and runs like shit, but at least they RELEASED it on PC still. (and have been promising a patch now for over a week, watch it come out in two weeks and be nothing more than the five .ini tweaks that gamers themselves found)

3) And all the way at the bottom, we have Interplay. Just don't release anything on PC. Fuck the guys who actually made you great.

I will smile happily when the inevitable news of Interplay's (AND Vivendi's) demise appears here on Bluesnews.

The End, I'm sorry to hear that you guys got so royally shafted. I hope you and the others will be able to find a studio that appreciates your talents and the effort you put into titles soon.

Creston


Avatar 15604
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
2.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
33.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
4.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
6.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
9.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
10.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
3.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
5.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
8.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
12.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
13.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
15.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
28.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
30.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
11.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
14.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
16.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
17.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
18.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
20.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
19.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
21.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
22.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
23.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
29.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
32.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
24.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
25.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
26.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
27.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
31.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
34.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
35.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
39.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
40.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
41.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
42.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
63.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
43.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
44.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
47.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
49.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
45.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
57.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
69.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
59.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
36.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
37.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
38.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
46.
Dec 8, 2003Dec 8 2003
48.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
50.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
51.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
52.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
68.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
71.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
76.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
77.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
     OMFG
53.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
54.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
55.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
56.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
62.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
64.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
70.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
   Piracy
72.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
    Re: Piracy
65.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
66.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
67.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
84.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
87.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
88.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
 89.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
   Re: No subject
91.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
92.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
     Re: No subject
93.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
      Re: No subject
94.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
      Re: No subject
58.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
60.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
90.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
61.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
73.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
75.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
96.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
78.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
79.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
80.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
81.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
85.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
86.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
82.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
83.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
95.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
97.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
98.
Dec 9, 2003Dec 9 2003
99.
Dec 10, 2003Dec 10 2003
100.
Dec 10, 2003Dec 10 2003
101.
Dec 10, 2003Dec 10 2003
102.
Dec 10, 2003Dec 10 2003
103.
Dec 11, 2003Dec 11 2003
104.
Dec 17, 2003Dec 17 2003