Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

Games = Free Speech

Appeals court rules video games qualify as free speech has word of an appeals court decision overturning a previous ruling that stated computer and video games were not free speech as protected by the U.S. Constitution. Here's a bit:

Last April, Senior U.S. District Judge Stephen Limbaugh ruled that computer and video games had "no conveyance of ideas, expression or anything else that could possibly amount to free speech" in a St. Louis County case that sought to limit children's access to mature video games.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, saying a "particularized message" is not required when it comes to the First Amendment.

"If the First Amendment is versatile enough to 'shield [the] painting of Jackson Pollock, music of Arnold Schoenberg, or Jabberwocky verse of Lewis Carroll,' we see no reason why the pictures, graphic design, concept art, sounds, music, stories, and narrative present in video games are not entitled to a similar protection," the court said in its ruling. "The mere fact that they appear in a novel medium is of no legal consequence."

View
33. Re: Ahh... Jun 4, 2003, 07:37 Xombie
 
Typical. Industry hiding behind the Constitution even when their (some) products are detrimental to society. Nor did they have access to the science of psychiatry and sociology.
Considering that there has not yet been a single study to actually link violence to playing video games, I sincerely doubt that you know anything about psychology OR sociology.


This comment was edited on Jun 4, 07:38.
 
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 3, 21:53 Thank God Maximus_IGN
  2. Jun 3, 21:57  Re: Thank God Liquid
  3. Jun 3, 22:05  Re: Thank God Sepharo
  4. Jun 3, 22:11   Re: Thank God Nonicknameforme
  5. Jun 3, 22:12  Re: Thank God Narf2029
  13. Jun 4, 00:08  Re: Thank God Fang
  14. Jun 4, 00:25   Re: Thank God Cicatrix
  16. Jun 4, 00:40  Re: Thank God Ray Marden
  18. Jun 4, 00:45   Re: Thank God Halo
  6. Jun 3, 22:26 No subject Zha Zha Lau
  7. Jun 3, 22:40 GIVE ME... Ray Marden
  8. Jun 3, 22:50  Re: GIVE ME... Furious
  9. Jun 3, 22:59   Re: GIVE ME... Ray Marden
  10. Jun 3, 23:26 Limbaugh darthgeezer
  15. Jun 4, 00:25  Re: Limbaugh rambar
  17. Jun 4, 00:45   Excellent news Squirmer
  11. Jun 3, 23:27 Woot!!! Quaternion
  12. Jun 4, 00:01 Hell yes!!! Xombie
  19. Jun 4, 00:49 Ahh... Halsy
  20. Jun 4, 01:12  Re: Ahh...  ilian 
  23. Jun 4, 01:31   Re: Ahh... KaRRiLLioN
  25. Jun 4, 02:10    Re: Ahh... LordSteev
  24. Jun 4, 02:01   Re: Ahh... Maximus_IGN
  30. Jun 4, 04:02    Re: Ahh... SCG
  32. Jun 4, 07:37     Re: Ahh... Bronco
  34. Jun 4, 07:41      Re: Ahh... Xombie
  36. Jun 4, 08:19       Re: Ahh... Bronco
  40. Jun 4, 09:49       Re: Ahh... Valcor
  37. Jun 4, 08:46      Re: Ahh... SCG
  39. Jun 4, 09:43       Re: Ahh... Xombie
  42. Jun 4, 10:14        Re: Ahh... Bronco
  43. Jun 4, 12:02         Re: Ahh... Fang
  44. Jun 4, 14:13         Re: Ahh... Xombie
  45. Jun 4, 14:38          Re: Ahh... LordSteev
  46. Jun 4, 14:43          Re: Ahh... Bronco
  47. Jun 4, 14:47           Re: Ahh... Xombie
  60. Jun 5, 23:15         Re: Ahh... CultureShock
  41. Jun 4, 10:06       Re: Ahh... Bronco
  21. Jun 4, 01:23  Re: Ahh... SCG
  35. Jun 4, 08:09   Re: Ahh... 1badmf
  22. Jun 4, 01:23  Re: Ahh... darthgeezer
>> 33. Jun 4, 07:37  Re: Ahh... Xombie
  56. Jun 4, 23:09  Re: Ahh... Propagandhi
  26. Jun 4, 02:36 No subject wasrad
  28. Jun 4, 03:05  Re: No subject Halo
  38. Jun 4, 08:50  Re: No subject Anvil
  27. Jun 4, 03:05 There will be a part three to the story Creston
  29. Jun 4, 03:35 No subject pancreas
  31. Jun 4, 04:20 Games should be restricted to a degree Von Helmet
  49. Jun 4, 16:08  Re: Games should be restricted to a degree Sharpei Diem
  52. Jun 4, 17:00  Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Rick
  53. Jun 4, 17:52   Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Von Helmet
  54. Jun 4, 18:04   Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Xombie
  55. Jun 4, 22:35    Re: Games should be restricted to a degr anon@24.76
  58. Jun 5, 05:18     Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Von Helmet
  61. Jun 6, 00:17      Re: Games should be restricted to a degr pancreas
  62. Jun 9, 02:36       Re: Games should be restricted to a degr Phyrebird
  48. Jun 4, 15:43 No subject Bunko
  50. Jun 4, 16:12  Re: No subject KaRRiLLioN
  51. Jun 4, 16:48   Re: No subject nin
  57. Jun 5, 03:00 Thinking Ahead UnderLord
  59. Jun 5, 16:09 About time! Moog Operator


footer

Blue's News logo