|
|
 |
| [May 02, 2003, 09:28 am ET] - Share - Viewing Comments |
I've been watching the woman from the phone company through the window for the
last hour... since she knocked my DSL out in investigating phone difficulties.
I'd have complained, except she looks like she could break me in two over her
knee. Could be worse though... as she drove off, my connection hadn't yet
returned, and for a moment there I thought she had busted something.
I can't stop scratching my head over the sight of the president of the United
States arriving at his destination of an aircraft carrier via a tail hook
landing in a Navy jet. I realize it was favorable weather and I'm sure it was an
extremely qualified pilot at the controls during this maneuver, which is
conducted hundreds of times each day. It is, however, still the most dangerous
landing an aviator can make, and I just can't get over the idea that they were
willing to risk a crash landing for the increased impact of making his speech
from a carrier...
 |
| 2. |
sound warning |
May 2, 2003, 09:36 |
WarPig |
|
|
To all you guys who read Blue's at work: if you let your mouse pointer linger over the ad featuring the Matrix agent, it will make noise. At least it doesn't automatically make noise.
I just can't get over the idea that they were willing to risk a crash landing for the increased impact of making his speech from a carrier... I was thinking the exact same thing.
----------------------------------------- Of course I could be wrong... but really, what are the chances of that happening twice? |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
________________________________
GO SEAHAWKS! |
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
May 2, 09:31 |
No subject |
fredrickson |
| |
7. |
May 2, 09:48 |
Re: No subject |
fredrickson |
| >> |
2. |
May 2, 09:36 |
sound warning |
WarPig |
| |
5. |
May 2, 09:43 |
Re: sound warning |
nin |
| |
35. |
May 2, 12:44 |
Re: sound warning |
Fang |
| |
39. |
May 2, 13:12 |
Re: sound warning |
tempus |
| |
44. |
May 2, 13:49 |
Re: sound warning |
nin |
| |
9. |
May 2, 10:16 |
Re: sound warning |
Bronco |
| |
10. |
May 2, 10:17 |
Re: sound warning |
Bronco |
| |
3. |
May 2, 09:40 |
He's for sale now? |
Killian |
| |
4. |
May 2, 09:42 |
Re: He's for sale now? |
The Truth |
| |
6. |
May 2, 09:44 |
Re: He's for sale now? |
nin |
| |
8. |
May 2, 09:57 |
Re: He's for sale now? |
The Truth |
| |
11. |
May 2, 10:23 |
POTUS carrier landing |
Jim |
| |
14. |
May 2, 10:40 |
Re: POTUS carrier landing |
ZigZang |
| |
12. |
May 2, 10:33 |
No subject |
NoGodForMe |
| |
13. |
May 2, 10:38 |
Re: No subject |
Chizra |
| |
15. |
May 2, 10:42 |
Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Disemboweler |
| |
17. |
May 2, 10:53 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
banddirector |
| |
71. |
May 2, 16:19 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Schmoe |
| |
72. |
May 2, 16:24 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
rock climber |
| |
73. |
May 2, 16:26 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Bunko |
| |
18. |
May 2, 10:58 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Geese |
| |
21. |
May 2, 11:24 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
ZigZang |
| |
84. |
May 2, 20:25 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Jojo BoZley |
| |
85. |
May 2, 20:36 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
Pedle Zelnip |
| |
36. |
May 2, 12:51 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
JM |
| |
38. |
May 2, 13:00 |
Re: Reason for the aricraft landing... |
tempus |
| |
16. |
May 2, 10:44 |
No subject |
jalon |
| |
19. |
May 2, 11:06 |
Re: No subject |
Tom |
| |
20. |
May 2, 11:14 |
Re: No subject |
nin |
| |
22. |
May 2, 11:24 |
Re: No subject |
Bronco |
| |
27. |
May 2, 11:45 |
Re: No subject |
nin |
| |
23. |
May 2, 11:26 |
Re: No subject |
KaRRiLLioN |
| |
24. |
May 2, 11:36 |
Re: No subject |
bothersome |
| |
25. |
May 2, 11:37 |
Nice selection of links today |
webmasterjoe |
| |
26. |
May 2, 11:44 |
Re: Nice selection of links today |
Moonbender |
| |
28. |
May 2, 11:53 |
Americans |
Disemboweler |
| |
29. |
May 2, 12:04 |
Re: Americans |
Bronco |
| |
30. |
May 2, 12:14 |
Re: Americans |
fredrickson |
| |
32. |
May 2, 12:25 |
Re: Americans |
Blue |
| |
55. |
May 2, 15:12 |
Re: Americans |
Anvil |
| |
33. |
May 2, 12:28 |
Re: Americans |
The Truth |
| |
34. |
May 2, 12:42 |
Re: Americans |
tempus |
| |
37. |
May 2, 12:59 |
Re: Americans |
amygdala |
| |
40. |
May 2, 13:27 |
Re: Americans |
Geese |
| |
43. |
May 2, 13:48 |
Re: Americans |
cappy |
| |
66. |
May 2, 15:41 |
Re: Americans |
Anvil |
| |
69. |
May 2, 15:56 |
Re: Americans |
The Truth |
| |
70. |
May 2, 16:11 |
Re: Americans |
cappy |
| |
46. |
May 2, 14:04 |
Re: Americans |
chanur |
| |
31. |
May 2, 12:15 |
At least we have a president that has |
Talbain |
| |
41. |
May 2, 13:28 |
Touchy. |
mag |
| |
42. |
May 2, 13:45 |
Re: Touchy. |
Bronco |
| |
45. |
May 2, 13:50 |
Re: Touchy. |
The Truth |
| |
47. |
May 2, 14:07 |
Re: Touchy. |
VT Hoodlum |
| |
48. |
May 2, 14:09 |
Re: Touchy. |
mag |
| |
49. |
May 2, 14:14 |
Re: Touchy. |
tempus |
| |
50. |
May 2, 14:25 |
More fun math with NNFM |
Nonicknameforme |
| |
51. |
May 2, 14:28 |
OMFG |
StinkyFiddlewinks |
| |
52. |
May 2, 14:47 |
Re: OMFG |
nin |
| |
53. |
May 2, 14:58 |
OK, what the hell is an html.ng file? |
greg |
| |
54. |
May 2, 15:09 |
Proctology 101 |
Weas |
| |
56. |
May 2, 15:17 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
Geese |
| |
65. |
May 2, 15:40 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
cappy |
| |
75. |
May 2, 16:30 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
Geese |
| |
77. |
May 2, 16:47 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
cappy |
| |
59. |
May 2, 15:33 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
Bronco |
| |
68. |
May 2, 15:49 |
Re: Proctology 101 |
JM |
| |
57. |
May 2, 15:18 |
Dubya |
Bunko |
| |
58. |
May 2, 15:29 |
Flamewar |
Disemboweler |
| |
60. |
May 2, 15:33 |
No subject |
Hellbinder |
| |
61. |
May 2, 15:35 |
Re: No subject |
Bunko |
| |
62. |
May 2, 15:37 |
No leg to stand on? |
pay[oh]tea |
| |
63. |
May 2, 15:37 |
Sack |
MindTrigger |
| |
64. |
May 2, 15:38 |
No subject |
Hellbinder |
| |
67. |
May 2, 15:43 |
Re: No subject |
Bunko |
| |
74. |
May 2, 16:28 |
Tailhook Scandal? |
Bronco |
| |
89. |
May 2, 21:54 |
Re: Tailhook Scandal? |
WarPig |
| |
90. |
May 2, 22:55 |
Re: Tailhook Scandal? |
Bronco |
| |
76. |
May 2, 16:32 |
Americans |
Hugenex |
| |
78. |
May 2, 16:51 |
No subject |
Nonicknameforme |
| |
79. |
May 2, 16:54 |
Re: No subject |
nin |
| |
80. |
May 2, 16:55 |
Re: No subject |
cappy |
| |
81. |
May 2, 17:30 |
"Die <politcial faction> scum!" |
mag |
| |
88. |
May 2, 21:48 |
Re: |
WarPig |
| |
82. |
May 2, 19:56 |
Not to change the subject, but... |
Krazy Kat |
| |
83. |
May 2, 20:15 |
Weapons of mass destruction |
Von Helmet |
| |
92. |
May 3, 00:35 |
Re: Not to change the subject, but... |
Nyl |
| |
93. |
May 3, 06:59 |
Bush isnt the problem... |
ArA |
| |
94. |
May 3, 09:09 |
World Police Force |
ArA |
| |
96. |
May 3, 14:50 |
Re: World Police Force |
Pedle Zelnip |
| |
95. |
May 3, 09:23 |
Re: Bush isnt the problem... |
Dead Man Walking |
| |
97. |
May 3, 15:06 |
Re: Bush isnt the problem... |
Pedle Zelnip |
| |
86. |
May 2, 21:19 |
This is a gaming Forum |
Torlock |
| |
87. |
May 2, 21:34 |
Re: This is a gaming Forum |
WarPig |
| |
91. |
May 2, 23:00 |
Totally unrelated... |
Bronco |
| |
105. |
May 5, 04:53 |
Re: Totally unrelated... |
Rudy |
| |
98. |
May 3, 17:58 |
Oil... |
Torlock |
| |
99. |
May 4, 03:32 |
Re: Oil... |
ExcessDan |
| |
100. |
May 4, 03:36 |
Re: Oil... |
Soupkin |
| |
101. |
May 4, 10:14 |
Re: Oil... |
Bronco |
| |
102. |
May 4, 10:22 |
Math Equation |
Bunko |
| |
103. |
May 4, 19:21 |
Re: Math Equation |
Soupkin |
| |
104. |
May 5, 03:50 |
Re: Math Equation |
ArA |
| |
106. |
May 5, 08:58 |
Re: Math Equation |
nin |
| |
107. |
May 5, 10:16 |
Re: Math Equation |
Bronco |
| |
108. |
May 5, 10:31 |
Re: Math Equation |
nin |
| |
109. |
May 5, 10:37 |
Re: All About the Oil |
KaRRiLLioN |
| |
110. |
May 8, 09:27 |
scandal |
Jim |
|
|
|