Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

Star Wars Galaxies Contracts

Star Wars Galaxies features delayed on GameSpot (thanks Ant) is an article revealing that some of the features planned for the upcoming Star Wars MMORPG will not be included when the game launches, currently scheduled for April 15 (story). The delayed features include "player-owned cities, drivable vehicles, player-generated missions, and the Dark Jedi character class." The story is based on a forum post by LucasArts producer Haden Blackman, who explains there's "a plan for implementing the postponed systems within the first seven or eight months after launch." The report also points out that "many of the delayed features are not immediately critical because it will take some time for players to attain the necessary levels in order to use them." There is no word on how this impacts the plan to ship an expansion about six months after the game's launch to add space flight and combat to the mix (story).

View
21. Re: Eh? Feb 7, 2003, 00:35 Xombie
 
The problem with SWG is Sony knows to make money all they have to do is release a stable game not a good game or a game with content.
How can that be such a big problem when the game is being developed by LucasArts, who also own the license?
I'm assuming that they were intelligent enough to get some control over release of the game.
 
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Feb 6, 19:19 No subject fredrickson
  3. Feb 6, 19:26  Re: No subject Mad Max RW
  8. Feb 6, 20:44   Re: No subject Bronco
  2. Feb 6, 19:20 Kinda Sad, but Understandable The Raven
  4. Feb 6, 19:27  Re: Kinda Sad, but Understandable GandalfTheWhite
  5. Feb 6, 19:33   Re: Kinda Sad, but Understandable Mad Max RW
  6. Feb 6, 19:58  Re: Kinda Sad, but Understandable Weas
  9. Feb 6, 21:00   Re: Kinda Sad, but Understandable The Raven
  7. Feb 6, 20:09 This sounds... nmg
  10. Feb 6, 21:16 Sounds like WW2OL 2 The Mule
  11. Feb 6, 21:23 so.. Hugenex
  12. Feb 6, 21:33 ah poop Pete
  13. Feb 6, 21:51 Eh? Cicatrix
  14. Feb 6, 22:23  Re: Eh? Red
  15. Feb 6, 22:30   Re: Eh? Mad Max RW
  16. Feb 6, 22:33  Re: Eh? Bruce
>> 21. Feb 7, 00:35   Re: Eh? Xombie
  22. Feb 7, 02:26    Re: Eh? Pete
  17. Feb 6, 23:41 No subject Overon
  18. Feb 6, 23:53  Re: No subject Cicatrix
  20. Feb 7, 00:29  Re: No subject Wolfen
  19. Feb 7, 00:28 A long time ago, in a logic far far away Xombie
  23. Feb 7, 04:59 Does this surprise anybody? Creston
  24. Feb 7, 05:47  such a shame Armengar
  25. Feb 7, 11:45   Re: such a shame Panick
  26. Feb 7, 13:07    No Shame Da Stylin' Rastan
  27. Feb 7, 13:53 No subject MacD
  28. Feb 13, 22:25 No... nmg
  29. Feb 13, 23:28  Re: No... fredrickson


footer

Blue's News logo