30 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
 |
| 30. |
Re: No subject |
Dec 26, 2002, 05:57 |
Xymph |
|
|
That's the Blue's News logo used in the winter of '98 You are repeating yourself.  But the logo is repeated indeed, being used in the holiday seasons of 2000, 2001 and this year. What's your point? 
-- Frans
3D Gamers admin, http://www.3dgamers.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 29. |
No subject |
Dec 26, 2002, 03:52 |
teh mane mahn |
|
|
That's the Blue's News logo used in the winter of '98.
_____
The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____
The possible pain, suffering and sacrifice of discovery are by no means an excuse to remain ignorant.
The bartering of things sought earned are by a means which only little men can abide by and hope to achieve. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 27. |
Re: T3 Trailer |
Dec 20, 2002, 00:13 |
nin |
|
|
>>> Anybody able to find it to let me know where it is?
I'd do a search of the drive w/ *.*, and then sort by date and time. It should be towards the bottom (or top depending on how you sort it).
I've never like the search function under XP, it seems a bit flaky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 26. |
Re: Matrix Sequel |
Dec 20, 2002, 00:03 |
nin |
|
|
>>> Could you fill us in on what the commentators said about it? Did they say how it was leaked?
I wish I could! I support (hardware, software) a group of stock traders. Since they follow the markets and news they have about 10-15 tvs, all running news. I happened to glance over at one and noticed that the footage looked REAL familiar. As I approached the tv (it was muted - since the traders are usually yelling to each other about deals) Fox news popped up their logo at the bottom with a caption that said something to the effect of "AC130 Gunship attack".
It was about 4pm cst, if that helps...
Here's a link w/ an excerpt:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,31465,00.html
The might of American firepower is coming to light in some pirate video showing an AC-130 gunship engaging the enemy in Afghanistan. FNC Correspondent Major Garret will have that story.
If anyone else happened to catch it, I'd love to hear about the reporters take on it and how it got released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 25. |
T3 Trailer |
Dec 19, 2002, 23:46 |
Trey |
|
|
Some technical help from someone wiser than me this evening. I am trying to save this video to show to friends. Usually I can go into my Temporary Internet Files and find the .mov extension and save it. This time it does not appear, even though I am watching the trailer in a browser window. To me this means it was downloaded to my machine, but I am still unable to find it. Anybody able to find it to let me know where it is? I have done a search of the hard drive with a *.mov but still no luck. I am running XP Pro if that matters. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 24. |
Direct X 9 final is on MS servers |
Dec 19, 2002, 22:07 |
Pete |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 23. |
Re: Matrix Sequel |
Dec 19, 2002, 21:39 |
Bronco |
|
|
It just made Fox news!
Could you fill us in on what the commentators said about it? Did they say how it was leaked?
-TPFKAS2S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 22. |
Re: Matrix Sequel |
Dec 19, 2002, 17:31 |
nin |
|
|
Anybody remember that AC130 gunship footage that got posted in OotB on last Sunday? It just made Fox news!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 21. |
Re: Matrix Sequel |
Dec 19, 2002, 17:06 |
banddirector |
|
|
Hey nin - - that "swipeable" thing was cool - - never thought of doing that before ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| There's no place like 127.0.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 20. |
Re: T3 |
Dec 19, 2002, 15:24 |
Mashiki Amiketo |
|
|
| #15 throw in some temporal paradox's and you'll end up at the same point, with the same rise of the machines. Lets hope it's good and doesn't suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 19. |
Re: Matrix Sequel |
Dec 19, 2002, 15:13 |
nin |
|
|
>>>I do believe they always intended for the Matrix to be a Trilogy of movies, but wanted to see how the first one would do (kinda like Star Wars when it came out). I seriously doubt that it'll have the "taked on sequel" feel, considering that both new movies were always part of the overall story. I'm really looking forward to them.
<<<MATRIX SPOILER ALERT?>
Keanu has said something to the effect of "The first movie is about birth, the second is about life, and the third is about death." I think that explains what happens to Neo in 3. It's my understanding that part 2 and 3 take place in a single 24 hour period, with 2 being mostly in the Matrix, and 3 being mostly in the real world.
<<<END SPOILER>>>
Edit: trying to make it swipeable, so it won't ruin it for everyone...
This comment was edited on Dec 19, 15:16. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 18. |
Re: T3 |
Dec 19, 2002, 15:08 |
nin |
|
|
>>> Besides in the first one I recall Reese saying that the time machine was destroyed after he went through. Wouldn't that make the whole T2 plotline difficult let alone a T3?
Depends on weather they sent the T-1000 back BEFORE Kyle went back...I agree, it's a stretch, but that again, so is time travel in general. And we all know how sequels like to exploit loopholes.
And to answer another poster (whose name I missed) I also heard that Ah-nold was signed for both parts 3 and 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 17. |
Matrix Sequel |
Dec 19, 2002, 14:44 |
Big Dookie |
|
|
I do believe they always intended for the Matrix to be a Trilogy of movies, but wanted to see how the first one would do (kinda like Star Wars when it came out). I seriously doubt that it'll have the "taked on sequel" feel, considering that both new movies were always part of the overall story. I'm really looking forward to them.
Oh, and in the T3 trailer: "She'll be back."
HAHAHAHA.... how lame can they get?
This comment was edited on Dec 19, 14:45. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 16. |
wow... |
Dec 19, 2002, 14:10 |
Hyatus |
|
|
I'm sure it'll be a decent action movie, but...ugh...
I agree. I want a future Terminator movie.
Course, didn't Arnold already agree to doing T4?
I swear I heard that a couple months back.
-Hyatus
"da da da"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 15. |
T3 |
Dec 19, 2002, 13:58 |
Scottish Martial Arts |
|
|
I don't have too high hopes either. I had been hoping it would take place during the future wars as the whole time travel gimmick has been used twice and does not need to be used a third time. Besides in the first one I recall Reese saying that the time machine was destroyed after he went through. Wouldn't that make the whole T2 plotline difficult let alone a T3?
Anyway not like this matter as I, like everyone else, will probably still go see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Ghost Of Christmas Future Taunts Childre |
Dec 19, 2002, 13:18 |
Pete |
|
|
funny stuff, im still laughing after posting this
and i want that ps5, even though its only satire
edit:
t3 looks like ass
This comment was edited on Dec 19, 13:25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: T3 |
Dec 19, 2002, 11:50 |
Jim |
|
|
I have to say the T3 trailer disappointed me a bit. Especially the "She'll be back" line.
After seeing 2 movies from the Lord of the Rings trilogy, I find myself expecting a lot more from movies. LotR raises the bar quite a bit and movies that looked like they would be good a couple years ago just don't seem to be that exciting anymore. I have yet to see Star Trek Nemesis, but I'm not expecting much from it.
And T3 does look like a lot of been there done that. Probably would have been good if they released it 2 or 3 years after T2.
And what are they thinking making a sequel to "The Matrix"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: No subject |
Dec 19, 2002, 11:46 |
nin |
|
|
>>> I think this movie might be one of the better ones of the year.
Oh don't get me wrong, I'm sure I'll go see it. I just don't have high hopes.
>>> so with A Charlie Brown Christmas appropriately playing in the background we had our little soiree.
So Blue, does this mean you'll have HtwD dancing on your piano?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
No subject |
Dec 19, 2002, 11:31 |
Sp3eD |
|
|
I thought it actually looked pretty good. If the story is put together correctly (which I thought they have been floating around this story and idea for a good 6 or 7 years so ample time), and the action scenes are all as elaborate as they were in that trailer (I mean look at all that destruction at most of those parts, that costs money), I think this movie might be one of the better ones of the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
30 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
