Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

BF1942 Add-on?

The EBGames.com Website (thanks GameSpyDaily) has details on an unannounced multiplayer add-on for Battlefield 1942 titled "The Road to Rome" that's apparently in the works. Here's a bit from the EB listing, which also includes a batch of 20 screenshots (though the images seem to be broken at the moment):

Though multiplayer experience will be the focus of The Road To Rome, there will be a mode of unique single player action. These levels feature improved artificial intelligence with no scripting, meaning players will get a completely different experience each time.

  • Six new maps from the Sicilian and Italian campaigns including Operation Husky (Sicily), and the battles for Anzio and Monte Cassino.
  • Eight new vehicles including the German BF-110 and British Mosquito fighter bombers.
  • Two new fighting forces including the French legionnaires and Italian forces.
  • Three new hand-held weapons including a rifle grenade launcher, the British Sten SMG and bayonets.
  • Proprietary Refractor 2 engine raises bar for graphics and 3D rendering.
  • Huge multiplayer component supporting up to 64 players that requires teamwork and cooperation from each member in order to achieve victory for the Axis or Allies.
  • Unique single player mode features no scripting, meaning the player gets different experience each time they play.

View
38. Re: Popularity does not equate to quality Nov 13, 2002, 17:50 Chris
 
hehe, i'm sure that's why all those police departments, such as sapd, selected glock .40 s&w's also

 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Nov 13, 11:35 a couple comments Pete
  28. Nov 13, 15:47  Re: a couple comments Zanzibar
  30. Nov 13, 16:01   Re: a couple comments GandalfTheWhite
  34. Nov 13, 16:51    Re: a couple comments Pete
  35. Nov 13, 17:09  Re: a couple comments Fear_The_Ripost
  39. Nov 13, 19:46   Re: a couple comments Big_Bear
  45. Nov 14, 05:09    Re: a couple comments Fear_The_Ripost
  48. Nov 15, 16:52    Re: a couple comments stodge
  49. Nov 15, 23:27     Re: a couple comments Chance
  50. Nov 16, 17:07      Re: a couple comments SacredGinmill
  2. Nov 13, 11:40 How about a patch first? Oblivion
  3. Nov 13, 11:45  Re: How about a patch first? WYSIWYG
  4. Nov 13, 11:47  Re: How about a patch first? ExcessDan
  12. Nov 13, 13:15   Re: How about a patch first? Razorman
  16. Nov 13, 13:55    Re: How about a patch first? ExcessDan
  23. Nov 13, 14:23     Re: How about a patch first? Razorman
  5. Nov 13, 11:48  Re: How about a patch first? Enforcer
  18. Nov 13, 13:59  Re: How about a patch first? Fausticle
  51. Nov 18, 21:01   Re: How about a patch first? Gooner
  41. Nov 13, 21:01  Re: How about a patch first? Ray Marden
  43. Nov 13, 21:13   Re: How about a patch first? DrEvil
  6. Nov 13, 11:51 no AI improvement? Mead
  7. Nov 13, 11:56  Re: no AI improvement? ExcessDan
  13. Nov 13, 13:26   Re: no AI improvement? Mead
  14. Nov 13, 13:36    Re: no AI improvement? Grounded
  17. Nov 13, 13:55    Stop talking about bots SacredGinmill
  19. Nov 13, 14:04     Re: Stop talking about bots Soupkin
  22. Nov 13, 14:23      Re: Stop talking about bots Hump
  24. Nov 13, 14:37       Re: Stop talking about bots Soupkin
  8. Nov 13, 11:58  Re: no AI improvement? fredrickson
  9. Nov 13, 12:25   Re: no AI improvement? ReDeeMeR
  10. Nov 13, 12:38    Re: no AI improvement? eunichron
  11. Nov 13, 12:50   Re: no AI improvement? nmg
  15. Nov 13, 13:46 come one psychochicken
  20. Nov 13, 14:05 No subject Elf Shot The Food
  21. Nov 13, 14:17 No fuckin' chance! Weas
  25. Nov 13, 14:52 Popularity does not equate to quality Mead
  26. Nov 13, 15:05  Re: Popularity does not equate to quality RaTzo
  27. Nov 13, 15:37   Uhhhh: WRONG! Oblivion
  29. Nov 13, 15:50   Re: Popularity does not equate to quality Mead
  31. Nov 13, 16:06   Re: Popularity does not equate to quality Enforcer
  36. Nov 13, 17:28  Re: Popularity does not equate to quality Chris
  37. Nov 13, 17:41   Re: Popularity does not equate to quality SacredGinmill
>> 38. Nov 13, 17:50    Re: Popularity does not equate to quality Chris
  32. Nov 13, 16:18 Patch Steele Johnson
  33. Nov 13, 16:41 Fix First, Then Expand Sadogoat
  40. Nov 13, 20:22 The patch, the SP and the French Slingblade
  42. Nov 13, 21:11  Re: The patch, the SP and the French RaTzo
  44. Nov 14, 02:55   Re: The patch, the SP and the French Chance
  46. Nov 14, 06:34   Re: The patch, the SP and the French Mead
  47. Nov 14, 14:26 Time for everyone to STOP OVERREACTING Joey Zaza
  52. Nov 18, 23:01 Dissapointing Alak
  53. Nov 19, 11:09  Re: Dissapointing Armengar


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo