Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project Gold

[May 08, 2002, 7:25 pm ET] - Share - Viewing Comments

3D Realms' George Broussard updated his .plan with word that Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project, the 3D platform action game developed by Sunstorm Interactive, has gone gold. The game is expected to arrive on store shelves "in a couple of weeks."

View

38.

Re: They had the

May 9, 2002, 14:45

Dead_Cow

Actually, the Unreal engine doesn't have multiple iterations, like Q1 engine, Q2 engine, etc, it's a progressive release. I considered that fact many times. I think that it will utilize the latest Unreal engine technology, simply because it's built in. Still though, I'm sick of waiting. Even if I can open every door, shoot out every wall, hell, even if I can build custom sandcastles on the beach, that level of interaction isn't worth 5 years of "when it's done" PR crap. I know the bar they hoped to hit was "a new level of interactivity", but there is such a thing as overdoing it.

		Date	Subject	Author
	1.	May 8, 19:44	A Duke Game!	anon@24.168
	2.	May 8, 19:56	Re: A Duke Game!	Schnapple
	3.	May 8, 20:19	Re: A Duke Game!	Creole Ned
	4.	May 8, 20:26	Re: A Duke Game!	Schnapple
	15.	May 8, 23:17	Re: A Duke Game!	Creole Ned
	17.	May 8, 23:49	Re: A Duke Game!	Halo
	7.	May 8, 21:13	Re: A Duke Game!	Mastaba
	10.	May 8, 21:30	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@24.168
	28.	May 9, 07:32	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@192.128
	11.	May 8, 21:30	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@24.168
	9.	May 8, 21:22	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@206.111
	13.	May 8, 21:57	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@24.65
	14.	May 8, 23:17	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@65.29
	19.	May 9, 00:40	Re: A Duke Game!	AcidDrone
	21.	May 9, 01:51	Re: A Duke Game!	anon@65.42
	5.	May 8, 20:43	No subject	anon@63.193
	6.	May 8, 20:53	Re: No subject	anon@209.31
	8.	May 8, 21:15	Re: No subject	the_culture
	12.	May 8, 21:53	Re: No subject	Bronco
	16.	May 8, 23:49	duke?	anon@24.208
	18.	May 8, 23:54	---	anon@24.208
	20.	May 9, 00:40	Re: ---	KaRRiLLioN
	27.	May 9, 05:57	Re: ---	Flo
	22.	May 9, 02:19	No subject	anon@12.250
	23.	May 9, 02:29	come on....	Hill
	24.	May 9, 02:32	come on....	Hill
	25.	May 9, 03:57	Re: come on....	anon@64.109
	26.	May 9, 04:15	I always say....	killrig
	29.	May 9, 08:18	No subject	Hump
	30.	May 9, 09:24	Just rediculous.	Dead_Cow
	31.	May 9, 09:58	Re: Just rediculous.	Lunchpail
	33.	May 9, 10:46	Re: Just rediculous.	Schnapple
	36.	May 9, 13:24	Re: Just rediculous.	Lunchpail
	32.	May 9, 10:03	Raven Sucks at Game Design	anon@24.208
	52.	May 13, 22:49	Re: Raven Sucks at Game Design	anon@24.62
	34.	May 9, 10:59	DN:MP and DNF	ZigZang
	35.	May 9, 11:04	Oh and . . .	ZigZang
	37.	May 9, 13:32	They had the	Hill
>>	38.	May 9, 14:45	Re: They had the	Dead_Cow
	39.	May 9, 14:48	No subject	anon@130.86
	44.	May 11, 11:11	Re: #39	anon@12.226
	40.	May 9, 17:34	yay	anon@207.67
	41.	May 9, 17:35	in fact	anon@207.67
	42.	May 9, 17:50	..	anon@65.42
	43.	May 9, 23:36	Re: ..	anon@216.254
	48.	May 12, 09:06	Re: ..	BicycleRepairMan
	45.	May 11, 14:27	Get used to it....!	anon@66.176
	49.	May 12, 23:51	Re: Get used to it....!	anon@12.228
	50.	May 13, 00:34	haha, I just think its funny	Roundhouse
	56.	May 15, 18:26	Re: haha, I just think its funny	anon@67.251
	59.	May 16, 03:04	Re: haha, I just think its funny	Roundhouse
	55.	May 15, 18:25	Re: Get used to it....!	anon@67.251
	46.	May 11, 14:46	3rd Person Games Suck	anon@66.176
	47.	May 11, 23:48	Re: 3rd Person Games Suck	anon@64.213
	60.	May 29, 20:55	Re: 3rd Person Games Suck	anon@66.176
	61.	Jul 25, 00:48	Re: 3rd Person Games Suck	anon@66.176
	51.	May 13, 20:34	Im glad it went gold..	anon@209.20
	53.	May 15, 14:28	what a gay game	anon@64.212
	54.	May 15, 15:29	To everyone:	anon@130.86
	57.	May 15, 19:25	Re: To George	anon@209.20
	58.	May 15, 23:21	what a bunch of fukin morons	anon@24.208