Axis wrote on Mar 21, 2014, 14:08:
Brian Crecente thanks you Beamer, he couldn't have defended himself better.
However the fact is the title purposefully misleads, and the article doesn't try to differentiate much. I didn't delve deep, my bad. But the article should be titled "PS4 cameras sell out due to twitch popularity".
See the gigantic difference? No, you don't.
Because there is none.
Let's break the title down:
"Blame" this means something is a cause
"the popularity of Twitch" this means Twitch is popular
"for" this means the popularity did something
"the lack of PS4 cameras" this means it's hard to find PS4 cameras
Putting it all together, Twitch is a popular service, and due to this there are no PS4 cameras. Or, in your words, PS4 cameras sell out due to Twitch popularity.
You read it wrong. Then you doubled down. Idiots everywhere thank you, as they couldn't do a better job of making them look good by comparison.
Best case scenario, you have no clue what the difference between "for" and "on" is. But "Blame the popularity of Twitch on the lack pf PS4 cameras" makes no sense.
In reality, you somehow think the headline is "Blame the Popularity of Twitch On PS4 Cameras," which arguably uses most of the words in the actual headline but not in the way the headline does. And would imply Twitch's popularity is a bad thing that needs blame.