Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Project CARS Questions

There's a very lengthy article on Eurogamer on the status of Project CARS, the upcoming crowdfunded racing game in the world at NFS Shift developer Slightly Mad Studios. The game's 3.5m budget is mostly from fans who have backed the title, and the article goes into extreme detail in exploring to what degree this was presented to backers as an investment where they should expect returns, and how this may or may not all be kosher under U.K. law. They also note that examples of potential returns were based on far fewer backers participating than the project ultimately attracted. Part of the issue with U.K. laws concerns "unregulated investments," and though Slightly Mad has used the term investment at times, the article states they have a different way of characterizing this: "Slightly Mad argues that WMD isn't an investment scheme. It says those who backed Project CARS are freelance contractors and they will be paid from the profits." This situation is still under review by the authorities, as they explain: "The FSA is still investigating the pCARS scheme, under its new name of the Financial Conduct Authority, which came into effect on 1 April. If the regulator gives WMD the all clear, other developers could follow its example, and Slightly Mad's revolution could be even bigger than anyone thought." And the outcome may have serious repercussions for some of their investors/freelance contractors, as the story includes examples of people who sank relatively large sums of money into this project. Thanks tom.

View
2 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >

2. Re: Project CARS Questions Apr 19, 2013, 08:56 Dev
 
RLEE wrote on Apr 18, 2013, 21:52:
The far fewer backers comment is totally false. The original numbers in the design documentation was an example for how they could get to the fully funded state. It doesn't matter how many contributors there are, the revenue gets divided equally based on how much money was put in. That article is full of so much misleading and completely false information it's not worth reading. The guy who wrote it doesn't even understand basic finance.

Perhaps you should write one up then, Mr. One post.
A rebuttal point by point, or a totally separate article, up to you.
 
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
1. Re: Project CARS Questions Apr 18, 2013, 21:52 RLEE
 
The far fewer backers comment is totally false. The original numbers in the design documentation was an example for how they could get to the fully funded state. It doesn't matter how many contributors there are, the revenue gets divided equally based on how much money was put in. That article is full of so much misleading and completely false information it's not worth reading. The guy who wrote it doesn't even understand basic finance.  
Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
2 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >


footer

Blue's News logo