5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 5. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2013, 13:07 |
Cutter |
|
|
Just more some more tactical options, kneeling/cover, reloading, etc. would have filled it out more. My main concern was the limited amount of maps and no randomizer/editor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2013, 12:36 |
netnerd85 |
|
|
Just finished playing the demo, definitely going to buy just not at the current price due to all the concerns raised. If they announce a massive update, then maybe. Otherwise I'm happy playing Grand Ages Rome at the moment, until a sale comes around.
@Cutter I believe this is their first dip into the turn based tactical play, they are more the city builder / management kind of developer. So if anything would be enhanced I would expect the management side of things. I haven't played any Xcom game, what about it do you want to see in Omerta? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2013, 11:52 |
Cutter |
|
|
The tactical needs to have more depth like Xcom. They need more maps, a map randomizer and a map editor to create those maps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2013, 10:46 |
JaguarUSF |
|
|
| Omerta's main issue is a lack of depth: it's too easy to succeed and you end up doing the same thing each mission. At least it has the tactical battles to vary things up a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Game Reviews |
Feb 13, 2013, 10:14 |
netnerd85 |
|
|
| Hrmmm, so if Omerta comes down in price and/or adds more content, more things to do then it's good? Sounds like they just need to patch it up good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
