7 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 7. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Jan 30, 2013, 21:59 |
UnderLord |
|
|
So, you can only contribute to the games debate if you know sod-all about it. A debate specifically made for politicians, obviously. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Jan 30, 2013, 11:21 |
Creston |
|
|
Someone may want to tell that fucking assbag that there is this thing called the FIRST FUCKING AMENDMENT. Which basically states that, hey, you know, I am ALLOWED to talk about shit that interests or affects me, even if some cockbag Senator doesn't agree with my position.
How do you Californians keep putting that asshole into office?
Creston |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Jan 30, 2013, 10:23 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
| Democrats? Trying to tell people what to do and how to live, and what they can and can't have? Gee that never happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 4. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Jan 30, 2013, 02:27 |
jimnms |
|
|
HorrorScope wrote on Jan 29, 2013, 23:02: ...Or how about telling all women that they have no say in the current medical/female body debates simply because they are female and have a self interest in the topic? Don't they do that already? |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Jan 30, 2013, 01:31 |
Cutter |
|
|
A politician criticizing others for self-interest and greed? LOL! |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 2. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Jan 29, 2013, 23:02 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
“Gamers have got to just quiet down. Gamers have no credibility in this argument. This is all about their lust for violence and the industry’s lust for money. This is a billion-dollar industry. This is about their self-interest.”
Maybe I’m wrong but isn’t that similar to telling all gun owners that they have no say at all in any potential gun control laws? Or how about telling all women that they have no say in the current medical/female body debates simply because they are female and have a self interest in the topic? That’s not even mentioning the irony of any politician speaking about “credibility.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 1. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Jan 29, 2013, 22:40 |
Quboid |
|
|
| What a twunt. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
7 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|