Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

The Atlantic - How the Video-Game Industry Already Lost Out in the Gun-Control Debate.
As it happens, that's just what happened to games (and popular media more generally) in the NRA's good guy with a gun response to the Newtown shooting. Guns aren't a factor in gun violence for the NRAŚrather, games, media, and law enforcement failures must take the blame. Once the terms of the debate are set like this (and set they very much were thanks to the over-the-top bravado in this press conference) then it's very hard to extract oneself from the debate without shifting the frame, without changing the terms of the debate.

I certainly believe that the White House would like nothing more than to see an end to mass gun murders in America's elementary schools. But the fact remains that gun violence takes place every day, all across this country, at a rate of dozens of deaths a day, and as the leading cause of death among African-American youth. But when the vice president establishes a task force on gun control and violence that includes the media industries that the NRA has once again chosen as their patsies after a particularly heinous and public example of gun violence, all it can do is shift attention away from guns.

IGN - Let's Talk About Violent Video Games.
Distinctions between games for adults and those for kids are fairly clear these days, thanks to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB). Formed in 1994, the ESRB rates all video games as a guide for parents similar to the way movies are rated by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Games are rated ranging from E for Everyone and T for Teen to M for Mature, 17+.

There is a fundamental misunderstanding that games are only for children. This needs to change for the 'violence in games' dialogue to advance.

View
86. Re: Op Ed Jan 12, 2013, 14:30 Agent.X7
 
Creston wrote on Jan 11, 2013, 23:03:
Agent.X7 wrote on Jan 11, 2013, 19:52:
Creston, I hope you are not serious about that. That is the dumbest argument I have ever heard. Oh, so the DHS has prevented terrorist attacks, huh? We have had ONE ever. Period. We had none before that, and none after.

That's like claiming... I don't know. I honestly cannot think of anything as stupid as what you just said.

One attack, huh? The 1975 and 1993 bombings in New York City don't count? Oklahoma City in 1995 doesn't count? And that's me being generous and assuming that you meant we had no terrorist attacks on American soil, because if you're literally saying what it appears you are saying, that America has had exactly ONE terrorist attack against it, period, may I suggest just going ahead and switching to a different news source, because then you just reached a level of fucking ignorance heretofore only claimed by the President of fucking Iran.

And no attacks after?

let me just go back three years:

2010
May 1, New York City: a car bomb is discovered in Times Square, New York City after smoke is seen coming from a vehicle. The bomb was ignited, but failed to detonate and was disarmed before it could cause any harm. Times Square was evacuated as a safety precaution. Faisal Shahzad pleads guilty to placing the bomb as well as 10 terrorism and weapons charges.
Oct. 29: two packages are found on separate cargo planes. Each package contains a bomb consisting of 300 to 400 grams (11-14 oz) of plastic explosives and a detonating mechanism. The bombs are discovered as a result of intelligence received from Saudi Arabia's security chief. The packages, bound from Yemen to the United States, are discovered at en route stop-overs, one in England and one in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.
2011
Jan. 17, Spokane, Washington: a pipe bomb is discovered along the route of the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial march. The bomb, a "viable device" set up to spray marchers with shrapnel and to cause multiple casualties, is defused without any injuries.


"Awr shit the DHS dun do nothing there aint no attacks being made agains ush!" Solid argument there, numbnuts.

Creston

I was going to reply, but then I see that you chose to start calling names like a 5th grader, so I don't feel the need to argue with someone like that.
 
Avatar 23400
 
Origin - JStarX7
STEAM - Agent.X7
PSN - JStar_X7
Xbox Live - Agent X7
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jan 11, 09:48 Re: Op Ed InBlack
  2. Jan 11, 09:58  Re: Op Ed sauron
  8. Jan 11, 11:21   Re: Op Ed Mashiki Amiketo
  10. Jan 11, 11:40    Re: Op Ed sauron
  14. Jan 11, 12:07     Re: Op Ed eunichron
  16. Jan 11, 12:12      Re: Op Ed Beamer
  18. Jan 11, 12:16       Re: Op Ed Beamer
  25. Jan 11, 12:29        Re: Op Ed eunichron
  19. Jan 11, 12:16       Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  21. Jan 11, 12:21        Re: Op Ed Beamer
  26. Jan 11, 12:31         Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  35. Jan 11, 13:42          Re: Op Ed Beamer
  42. Jan 11, 14:18           Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  48. Jan 11, 14:40            Re: Op Ed sauron
  50. Jan 11, 14:50             Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  57. Jan 11, 15:06              Re: Op Ed sauron
  62. Jan 11, 15:18              Re: Op Ed Bodolza
  53. Jan 11, 14:57            Re: Op Ed Beamer
  55. Jan 11, 15:01            Re: Op Ed Verno
  56. Jan 11, 15:03             Re: Op Ed Beamer
  59. Jan 11, 15:10              Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  61. Jan 11, 15:16               Re: Op Ed Verno
  63. Jan 11, 15:20               Re: Op Ed Beamer
  64. Jan 11, 15:25                Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  66. Jan 11, 16:09                 Re: Op Ed Beamer
  65. Jan 11, 15:28                Re: Op Ed sauron
  83. Jan 12, 11:29                Re: Op Ed WinterMadness
  84. Jan 12, 13:00                 Re: Op Ed Beamer
  89. Jan 12, 15:36                  Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  90. Jan 12, 16:04                   Re: Op Ed Beamer
  91. Jan 12, 16:19                    Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  93. Jan 12, 18:45                     Re: Op Ed Beamer
  94. Jan 12, 19:45                      Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  95. Jan 12, 20:11                       Re: Op Ed WinterMadness
  96. Jan 12, 21:24                        Re: Op Ed nin
  98. Jan 12, 23:09                       Re: Op Ed Kosumo
  99. Jan 13, 12:38                       Re: Op Ed Beamer
  100. Jan 13, 13:38                        Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  101. Jan 13, 20:08                         Re: Op Ed Beamer
  85. Jan 12, 13:05                 Re: Op Ed nin
  74. Jan 11, 20:45            Re: Op Ed Cutter
  46. Jan 11, 14:35           Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  52. Jan 11, 14:57            Re: Op Ed Beamer
  71. Jan 11, 19:53             Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  72. Jan 11, 19:55              Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  73. Jan 11, 19:58               Re: Op Ed Prez
  75. Jan 11, 20:49                Re: Op Ed Cutter
  67. Jan 11, 16:14     Re: Op Ed Mashiki Amiketo
  11. Jan 11, 11:52    Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  12. Jan 11, 11:59     Re: Op Ed Beamer
  13. Jan 11, 12:03     Re: Op Ed sauron
  15. Jan 11, 12:08      Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  17. Jan 11, 12:14       Re: Op Ed sauron
  20. Jan 11, 12:20        Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  22. Jan 11, 12:22         Re: Op Ed sauron
  23. Jan 11, 12:26          Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  24. Jan 11, 12:28           Re: Op Ed Beamer
  31. Jan 11, 13:24          Re: Op Ed Creston
  30. Jan 11, 13:01         Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  34. Jan 11, 13:41          Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  41. Jan 11, 14:11       Re: Op Ed Chairman Kaga
  43. Jan 11, 14:20        Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  44. Jan 11, 14:28         Re: Op Ed Chairman Kaga
  47. Jan 11, 14:36          Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  54. Jan 11, 14:58           Re: Op Ed Chairman Kaga
  58. Jan 11, 15:09            Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  45. Jan 11, 14:33        Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  51. Jan 11, 14:51         Re: Op Ed Creston
  69. Jan 11, 19:52          Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  78. Jan 11, 23:03           Re: Op Ed Creston
>> 86. Jan 12, 14:30            Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  76. Jan 11, 20:57          Re: Op Ed Cutter
  77. Jan 11, 21:11           Re: Op Ed Prez
  81. Jan 11, 23:12           Re: Op Ed Creston
  87. Jan 12, 14:34           Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  88. Jan 12, 14:41            Re: Op Ed Beamer
  49. Jan 11, 14:49        Re: Op Ed Creston
  27. Jan 11, 12:31      Re: Op Ed Cutter
  28. Jan 11, 12:39       Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  29. Jan 11, 12:56       Re: Op Ed eunichron
  33. Jan 11, 13:28       Re: Op Ed Creston
  36. Jan 11, 13:44        Re: Op Ed sauron
  3. Jan 11, 10:45 Re: Op Ed Creston
  4. Jan 11, 10:51  Re: Op Ed InBlack
  6. Jan 11, 10:59   Re: Op Ed Creston
  7. Jan 11, 11:11    Re: Op Ed sauron
  5. Jan 11, 10:58  Re: Op Ed nin
  9. Jan 11, 11:26 Re: Op Ed eunichron
  32. Jan 11, 13:27 Re: Op Ed Verno
  38. Jan 11, 13:52  Re: Op Ed Bodolza
  40. Jan 11, 14:09   Re: Op Ed Verno
  37. Jan 11, 13:49 Re: Op Ed Creston
  39. Jan 11, 13:58  Re: Op Ed sauron
  60. Jan 11, 15:10 Re: Op Ed DangerDog
  68. Jan 11, 19:39 Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  70. Jan 11, 19:52  Re: Op Ed Prez
  79. Jan 11, 23:08  Re: Op Ed RollinThundr
  80. Jan 11, 23:11 Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  82. Jan 12, 01:46 Re: Op Ed El Pit
  92. Jan 12, 17:22 Re: Op Ed Dades
  97. Jan 12, 21:55 Re: Op Ed Dades


footer

Blue's News logo