11 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 11. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 20, 2012, 11:39 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
PHJF wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 11:08:
The added injector makes the AA picture perfect and the one line mod to an .ini to remove cell shading is very nice (preference).
Really, now... is it so difficult to put these things in games? I enjoy digging through .inis and .cfgs to subtly alter the nuances of engines. I don't enjoy having to inject my shit to change basic settings.
I agree. Esp with the injector. These companies try to come up with some form of reasonable AA. And this simple injector can just be placed in a folder and it has better quality AA and faster AA. So why not just use this method in the core code? Silly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: Borderlands 2 DLC Clue |
Sep 20, 2012, 11:08 |
PHJF |
|
|
The added injector makes the AA picture perfect and the one line mod to an .ini to remove cell shading is very nice (preference).
Really, now... is it so difficult to put these things in games? I enjoy digging through .inis and .cfgs to subtly alter the nuances of engines. I don't enjoy having to inject my shit to change basic settings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: Borderlands 2 DLC Clue |
Sep 20, 2012, 09:39 |
Panickd |
|
|
finga wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 05:56:
deqer wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 02:23:
Why not release mod tools and let us make our own DLC?
Because many companies believe that if you release it, you HAVE to support it, and few companies want to *support* mod tools. Many devs' mod tools are in an unfinished, broken state.
Plus, no one makes Gearbox stuff like Gearbox. This isn't Skyrim.
Yeah because DNF was just rocking awesome! Am I right?!?!?
But seriously, it has nothing to do with support (slap a beta tag on it and "we are not responsible if this breaks your shit" in the EULA and you're covered). It's all about that sweet, sweet DLC $$$. Games with mod tools and an active community using them are less likely to have players who are going to pay for DLC (on the PC, console users are stuck). That's why Bethesda made the first DLC for Skyrim more of a mini-expansion than your standard DLC fare. While I loved the first Borderlands, there were two of the DLC packs that I felt were kind of weak and had I not gotten the whole shebang during a Steam sale, I wouldn't have put money on them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 20, 2012, 09:26 |
nin |
|
|
The engine is amazing, so huge, loads fast runs fast.
Yeah, I expected to have to turn things down a little, but I think I have everything cranked, and it runs great. Very nice surprise...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: Borderlands 2 DLC Clue |
Sep 20, 2012, 05:56 |
finga |
|
|
deqer wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 02:23:
Is it free? If not, why? No. For the same reason expansion packs aren't free.
Why not release mod tools and let us make our own DLC?
Because many companies believe that if you release it, you HAVE to support it, and few companies want to *support* mod tools. Many devs' mod tools are in an unfinished, broken state.
Plus, no one makes Gearbox stuff like Gearbox. This isn't Skyrim.
Oh, and btw... How do you cancel a Contra title? Seriously, how do you cancel something that is so easy to make, and has such a legendary title? ... Bad games get canceled all the time. (They also often get released.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: Borderlands 2 DLC Clue |
Sep 20, 2012, 05:10 |
RailWizard |
|
|
deqer wrote on Sep 20, 2012, 02:23:
Is it free? If not, why?
Do we care about your DLC? Why?
Did not read, but I doubt it. The 'season pass' (ala BF3 Premium = multi unreleased DLC's..) is $30 on top of the $60 for the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: Borderlands 2 DLC Clue |
Sep 20, 2012, 02:23 |
deqer |
|
|
Is it free? If not, why?
Do we care about your DLC? Why?
Why not release mod tools and let us make our own DLC?
Ya...
Oh, and btw... How do you cancel a Contra title? Seriously, how do you cancel something that is so easy to make, and has such a legendary title? ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 20, 2012, 01:33 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
Dev wrote on Sep 19, 2012, 22:21:
HorrorScope wrote on Sep 19, 2012, 20:33:
The added injector makes the AA picture perfect and the one line mod to an .ini to remove cell shading is very nice (preference). What injector? Link?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=42272877&postcount=4640
This game is Fallout meets Diablo. The engine is amazing, so huge, loads fast runs fast. Fallout engine on steroids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 20, 2012, 00:28 |
PropheT |
|
|
Not sure about the injector, but you can use this:
Open WillowEngine.ini in C:/Users/yourprofile/My Games/Borderlands 2/WillowGame/Config/
and change:
DefaultPostProcessName=WillowEngineMaterials.Willo wScenePostProcess
to:
DefaultPostProcessName=EngineMaterials.DefaultUIPo stProcess
I think it has problems with depth of field from what I read, but I had that turned off anyway, so...
I like the look of it much better. Takes out a lot of the thick black lines in the game and makes it blend a lot better. Looks pretty spiffy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 19, 2012, 22:21 |
Dev |
|
|
HorrorScope wrote on Sep 19, 2012, 20:33:
The added injector makes the AA picture perfect and the one line mod to an .ini to remove cell shading is very nice (preference). What injector? Link? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: More Big Picture Details |
Sep 19, 2012, 20:33 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
| The added injector makes the AA picture perfect and the one line mod to an .ini to remove cell shading is very nice (preference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
11 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
