Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

On The Secret World's F2P Potential

There's an interview on GamesIndustry International talking with Ole Schreiner, the new CEO of Funcom, discussing The Secret World and the MMOG's subscription model versus the free-to-play scheme that many feel is the only viable future for such games. He says they considered F2P, and while a lot of how the game was created was based on subscriptions, they have the "tools" to make the switch should the decide it's necessary:

The Secret World was developed as a subscription-based game and the decisions made during planning and production was based on that business model. If we had designed The Secret World as a free-to-play offering we would have made some different decisions along the way, for example in terms of how the in-game store works and how our post-launch content plan would play out. We tried leaving our options open during development so that we could launch with a different model should we have decided during development that's what we wanted, but eventually we did settle on the subscription model and that's what informed much of the game's design.

That said we definitely have the tools to turn The Secret World into a free-to-play game - or even hybrid - should we decide to do that somewhere down the line. We did that with Age of Conan with significant success. We all know that trends and expectations in the gaming business, and perhaps particularly the MMO genre, is evolving quickly, and we're regularly re-evaluating our business model against the changing currents of the marketplace and our own player base as well. Not only in terms of The Secret World, but also our future games.

View
2. Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Sep 17, 2012, 13:15 Fibrocyte
 
I tried TSW on a 24-hour pass and was not impressed.

I have no problems with WoW's monthly subscription given the quality of the product, and so I'm still surprised that GW2 has no sub fee. I think they could have asked for some nominal amount, say $3/month, from their playerbase and not lost any players.
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Sep 17, 13:03 No subject deqer
>> 2. Sep 17, 13:15  Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Fibrocyte
  3. Sep 17, 13:23   Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential El Pit
  15. Sep 17, 21:38    Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Prez
  4. Sep 17, 13:26   Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential wtf_man
  5. Sep 17, 13:43 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential saluk
  8. Sep 17, 15:15  Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Jivaro
  11. Sep 17, 17:50  Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Endo
  17. Sep 18, 03:50  Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential .Drifter
  6. Sep 17, 13:58 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Wallshadows
  7. Sep 17, 14:10  Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential The Half Elf
  9. Sep 17, 15:18   Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential deqer
  10. Sep 17, 15:49 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Cutter
  12. Sep 17, 18:02 Re: More Big Picture Details HorrorScope
  13. Sep 17, 18:11  Re: More Big Picture Details Zarkonis
  14. Sep 17, 18:47 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Umbragen
  16. Sep 17, 22:07 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential WyldKat
  18. Sep 18, 08:02 Time to Announce a New Game in Dev. Jonjonz
  19. Sep 18, 12:51 Re: On The Secret World's F2P Potential Veterator


footer

Blue's News logo