12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 12. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 3, 2012, 10:07 |
SpectralMeat |
|
|
netnerd85 wrote on Aug 3, 2012, 07:53: How about a demo? I don't remember seeing too many demos for Ubisoft games, so don't hold your breath. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 11. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 3, 2012, 07:53 |
netnerd85 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 10. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 3, 2012, 00:51 |
Jerykk |
|
|
Seeing yourself on the screen is for bigscreen TVs aka consoles, not monitors. Please indicate a situation in real life where a soldier couldn't see an enemy because their own body blocked the guy in front of them! That's a pretty retarded opinion. Max Payne 1 & 2 were designed for PC. Heavy Metal: FAKK2 was designed for PC. Oni was designed for PC. Heretic 2 was designed for PC. MDK was designed for PC. Messiah was designed for PC. Giants was designed for PC.
There are plenty of PC-centric third-person shooters. Camera perspective has nothing to do with platform. Do I think it's the optimal perspective for shooters? No, but that has nothing to do with consoles. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 9. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 18:31 |
J |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Aug 2, 2012, 15:06: I wonder if the game sold well on PC meriting this support or if Ubi just has a new supervisor with a PC hard-on. Good to see in any case.
Also lol @ "if it's not a hardcore sim it's a bad game." That's not how quotation marks work |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 8. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 17:23 |
Aero |
|
|
Buggy crap, but hopefully the patch will fix that.
It's actually not so bad when it works. I like it better than all the GR games aside from the first one, though that isn't saying a whole lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 7. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 15:06 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
I wonder if the game sold well on PC meriting this support or if Ubi just has a new supervisor with a PC hard-on. Good to see in any case.
Also lol @ "if it's not a hardcore sim it's a bad game." |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 6. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 14:00 |
Jedi Master |
|
|
Third person only = GR fail.
GR was an FPS. It was not a "TPS". Seeing yourself on the screen is for bigscreen TVs aka consoles, not monitors. Please indicate a situation in real life where a soldier couldn't see an enemy because their own body blocked the guy in front of them!
I can forgive GRAW 1 and 2 for some of their failings to an extent because at least they were still FPS.
Many don't recall there was a console-only GR2 between GR1's last expansion and GRAW1...it was also 3rd person only.
Unless you're jumping platforms, sneaking into air ducts Sam Fisher-style, doing hand-to-hand or melee combat, or casting spells, you don't get a thing from being in 3rd person in a shooter compared to what you lose from being in 1st.
Ubi was too lazy to bother making the PC version an FPS, so I'm too lazy to buy their stupid game. Call me when GR is a FPS again, Ubi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 5. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 13:47 |
SpectralMeat |
|
|
| I did like the previous Ghost Recon games (Advanced Warfighter 1 and 2) I thought they were entertaining. This one however doesn't appeal to me for some reason. I did see a bunch of gameplay vids and I've heard some friends talking about it, but still mehh. Maybe when it hits the clearance bin for $5 or something. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 4. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 13:07 |
Techie714 © |
|
|
Darks wrote on Aug 2, 2012, 11:41:
Techie714 © wrote on Aug 2, 2012, 10:57: Ghost Recon is dead to me..... I’ll bet you haven’t even played it have you?
I’ve been playing this game Coop with a friend of mine and it’s a really good game. The action is over the top. The story is actually pretty good to.
Don’t mind people saying they don’t like a game, but to complain before even trying it is non-sense. Really, hmm...So how are the ballistics? Does it have that awesome "self healing mechanic"....Do the sniper rifles have bullet drop? How does the locational damage work? Is it a lot like the original GR? Yea, that's what I thought, the game has ZERO realism & pretty much is an arcade shooter...No thanks. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 3. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 11:48 |
xornand |
|
|
This game is awful. It's something made for 10 year olds. It's even more childish than COD.
Why don't they just let this game die? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 2. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 11:41 |
Darks |
|
|
Techie714 © wrote on Aug 2, 2012, 10:57: Ghost Recon is dead to me..... I’ll bet you haven’t even played it have you?
I’ve been playing this game Coop with a friend of mine and it’s a really good game. The action is over the top. The story is actually pretty good to.
Don’t mind people saying they don’t like a game, but to complain before even trying it is non-sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 1. |
Re: Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Patch/Content |
Aug 2, 2012, 10:57 |
Techie714 © |
|
|
| Ghost Recon is dead to me..... |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
12 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|