First of all when Stallman says free he means free that you can do what you want with it. Also I'm dismayed of all the non squitors and ad hominems in this thread. Who cares if he eats stuff from his feat or if he's a hippy or his personal appearance. How are personal attacks in any relevent to his arguments? Arguments stand and fall on their own not on the person who is presenting them. Make an argument against his argument. Talking about his personality is irrelevent to the arguments being presented.
This is what I will do: I will present an argument against his. I understand that Stallman has an ideology and that which conflicts with it he find disagreeable. He takes an ideological stance. He wants to keep free software really free and ideologically pure. My idea of freedom is having the choice of software that is free and that which is not and choosing what you want to run. If you want to run only free software, that's fine, if you want to run only commercial sofware, that's fine too. If you want to run both, that's cool. That is more free than what he's saying. The freedom to run non free software!
As a side not, I'm on Windows because I have gotten used to it because that's the only PC platform I can really play games on. If more games would run on GNU/Linux natively (not WINE) I would not be running Windows.