Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Greenbelt, MD 08/22

Regularly scheduled events

etc., etc.

View
16. Re: etc., etc. Jun 7, 2012, 03:09 Draugr
 
hjkar wrote on Jun 7, 2012, 01:08:
While I generally dislike EA and David DeMartini came off as a bit of an ass in the interview. I do think steam sales cause people to devalue games much like piracy does. One can argue the sales try to profit on the fact that the value of games are already devalued due to piracy but I believe it also perpetuates a lower value. The cost of making games risen but the prices haven't, contrary to most other industries. I recall being a child and buying a new copy of Secret of Evermore for the SNES for 74.99$. That was just the plain game, no collectors edition. Using a simple inflation calculator I could expect to pay 113.05$ for the game assuming inflation of 2.44%. If the average price of a big company game was 50$ in 1995 then it would be 75.37$ now.

And yet somehow, despite there being free content (legal or otherwise) to watch all over the internet, Film and TV industries still manage to make loads of cash. It's almost like the value of the product has nothing to do with how much money people are making off of it, and everything to do with the perceived quality of what is on offer.

While prices have gone down on games, and costs have gone up there has also been a meteoric rise in the number of consumers of these products, just one of the factors we need to take into account when looking back. Digital distribution also plays a factor, as would a larger pool of skilled workers to pull from (USUALLY resulting in cheaper labor.) It's important to note that correlation does not equal causation. Just because prices have gone down and piracy exists does not mean that prices have gone down because of piracy.
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 6, 21:54 Re: etc., etc. Dagnamit
  2. Jun 6, 22:01  Re: etc., etc. nin
  3. Jun 6, 22:14   Re: etc., etc. Shok
  4. Jun 6, 22:21    Re: etc., etc. ASeven
  10. Jun 7, 00:29     Re: etc., etc. Matshock
  5. Jun 6, 22:28    Re: etc., etc. nin
  6. Jun 6, 22:41     Re: etc., etc. PHJF
  21. Jun 7, 07:52    Re: etc., etc. Beamer
  22. Jun 7, 07:55     Re: etc., etc. Beamer
  7. Jun 6, 23:00 Re: etc., etc. Silicon Avatar
  8. Jun 7, 00:13 Re: etc., etc. ^Drag0n^
  9. Jun 7, 00:29 Re: etc., etc. WarpCrow
  11. Jun 7, 01:08 Re: etc., etc. hjkar
  14. Jun 7, 02:03  Re: etc., etc. Matshock
  15. Jun 7, 02:55   Re: etc., etc. J
>> 16. Jun 7, 03:09  Re: etc., etc. Draugr
  17. Jun 7, 04:15   Re: etc., etc. Prez
  19. Jun 7, 07:03    Re: etc., etc. MattyB
  24. Jun 7, 16:10    Re: etc., etc. Flatline
  25. Jun 7, 17:05     Re: etc., etc. Beamer
  18. Jun 7, 05:23  Re: etc., etc. CommunistHamster
  20. Jun 7, 07:12  Re: etc., etc. Dades
  23. Jun 7, 09:41  Re: etc., etc. Cutter
  12. Jun 7, 01:21 Re: etc., etc. jdreyer
  13. Jun 7, 01:55  Re: etc., etc. PHJF
  26. Jun 8, 23:32 Re: etc., etc. Ant


footer

Blue's News logo