Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

Thanks Cutter.

Gamasutra - Video game detractors becoming weaker, weirder.
Increasingly, the views of guys like Dr. Zimbardo and Bennett look crankish and odd. To make a connection between the popularity of online pornography and games seems like lazy thinking, a bizarre coupling of sexual compulsions with the compulsions to succeed built into some games by their designers. These are complex human behavior patterns that deserve to be studied and compared, not thrown together as a catch-all explanation for complicated socio-economic and cultural changes that may take us decades to unravel.

Rock, Paper, Shotgun - E3 Day Zero- When Game Violence Becomes Vile.
Yesterday, I saw games that treated violence as the raddest, most Mountain-Dew-can-crushed-against-your-forehead thing in the world, an utterly bone-chilling, blood-curdling last resort, and quite a few things in between. But wow, it sure didn’t look that way. And, if we don’t stay mindful of what game-makers are doing and how we’re acting in response, it won’t be that way for too much longer. So pay attention and speak up. Sure, a thousand hands clapping paints a pretty damning picture, but you know what’s a thousand times worse? Silence.

Rock, Paper, Shotgun - E3′s Press Events Do Not Represent The Gaming I Know.
And that’s just one example of the hoary, outdated tone all these pressers took. Embarrassing moments were scattered throughout, from a peculiar display of esports in tight-fitting clothing, to hosts declaring that they’re “a gamer first and, er, er, a woman seventh”, all punctuated throughout the night by producers holding controllers and pretending to control cutscenes like kids in a service station yanking the steering wheels of the driving arcades while “INSERT COIN” flashes on screen. The message is a peculiar contempt for the audience – of course they’re not really playing! In any game where you can get killed by the enemy, or, as so many of those shown wished you to believe, events are procedural and unscripted, not having a pre-filmed sequence in a live show would be just stupid. Stop pretending – it’s embarrassing.

CNET - Video game violence at E3: Too much, yet still not enough.
Unfortunately, E3 this year has done little to impress anyone who isn't already either a fan or an apologist for mind-numbing game violence. If anything, it's successfully buried the vibrant, creative, nuanced, clever, and amazing games that could help the industry get its mojo back.

View
5. Re: Op Ed Jun 6, 2012, 10:48 ViRGE
 
StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 6, 2012, 10:39:
There's plenty of stuff that isn't that, it just seems like it's all violent.
Of course. But why aren't they showing it off? That's the real issue. All the big games they could show this year, and they spent most of their game demo time on manshooters. As a gamer it tells me that they're disinterested in other genres, which is obviously going to raise my ire because I like variety.

If all you show off are manshooters then you're telling the public that video games are all about manshooters. You're telling developers that if they want to get stage time they need to make manshooters. You and I know that there's more to gaming than manshooters, but if all we celebrate is manshooters, then how much longer are developers going to make AAA games in other genres? I just don't like where this trend might lead.
Anyway, as the article itself says you can't have it both ways, you can't say GAMES ARE FREE SPEECH AND SHOULD NEVER CENSORED and then also write an article about how game violence makes you feel twitchy or angry or whatever. A lot of sites seem to play both angles.
I don't think anyone is saying games should be censored, are they? Just show things other things along with manshooters. Don't make the hardcore gamers look like the violent psychopaths that we are.
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 6, 10:23 Re: Op Ed ViRGE
  2. Jun 6, 10:39  Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
>> 5. Jun 6, 10:48   Re: Op Ed ViRGE
  14. Jun 6, 13:32    Re: Op Ed Agent.X7
  15. Jun 6, 13:43     Re: Op Ed Prez
  22. Jun 6, 18:18      Re: Op Ed Flatline
  24. Jun 6, 21:12       Re: Op Ed Prez
  25. Jun 6, 21:21        Re: Op Ed Beamer
  26. Jun 6, 21:58     Re: Op Ed ViRGE
  17. Jun 6, 15:13    Re: Op Ed jdreyer
  8. Jun 6, 11:47   Re: Op Ed DeadlyAccurate
  27. Jun 7, 03:59    Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  4. Jun 6, 10:48  Re: Op Ed Asmodai
  12. Jun 6, 13:13  Re: Op Ed Smellfinger
  3. Jun 6, 10:41 Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  6. Jun 6, 11:29 Re: Op Ed PropheT
  7. Jun 6, 11:45  Re: Op Ed Beamer
  9. Jun 6, 12:26 Re: Op Ed Cutter
  18. Jun 6, 15:25  Re: Op Ed jdreyer
  23. Jun 6, 19:49   Re: Op Ed Cutter
  10. Jun 6, 12:38 Re: Op Ed Tumbler
  11. Jun 6, 13:00  Re: Op Ed briktal
  13. Jun 6, 13:23  Re: Op Ed Smellfinger
  16. Jun 6, 13:50   Re: Op Ed Beamer
  19. Jun 6, 15:30  Re: Op Ed jdreyer
  20. Jun 6, 15:39 Re: Op Ed Mr. Tact
  21. Jun 6, 17:28  Re: Op Ed PHJF


footer

.. .. ..

Blue's News logo