8 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 8. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 23:56 |
D_K_night |
|
|
I was a little surprised myself that the band would have that much creative control over the game. So you can't have Stefani in these situations, but it's OK for other ones?
Plus the avatar version of herself doesn't even look anything like Stefani(?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 23:30 |
RailWizard |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 17:52 |
Cutter |
|
|
| Poor No Doubt, lord knows they must just be suffering immensely from all of this. My heart just bleeds for them, absolutely bleeds for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Peter, breakfast for dinner is anarchy!" - Lois |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 15:46 |
space captain |
|
|
| no doubt has always been plastic poser shit.. all of a sudden they dont like it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 14:35 |
Quboid |
|
|
The lawsuit claimed the feature turned the band "into a virtual karaoke circus act".
You signed up to be in Band Hero. Band Hero. Boo, fucking, hoo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 13:38 |
avianflu |
|
|
Did she really think her likeness would be used solely for their bands' songs? Silly lawsuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 13:17 |
Fibrocyte |
|
|
| If you go to the No Doubt article, you can see that every comment says No Doubt is in the wrong. WTH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
May 30, 2012, 12:46 |
Tanto Edge |
|
|
| Yeah, I think if I were an artist I'd be choked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
8 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
