Blizzard Entertainment and Valve announce a settlement of
the lawsuit over
Valve's trademark of
DOTA:
Blizzard Entertainment and Valve today announced a mutual agreement regarding concerns over the names of upcoming products. In accordance with the agreement, Valve will continue to use DOTA commercially, including DOTA 2, while Blizzard will preserve noncommercial use of DOTA for its community with regard to player-created maps for Warcraft III and StarCraft II.
"Both Blizzard and Valve recognize that, at the end of the day, players just want to be able to play the games they're looking forward to, so we're happy to come to an agreement that helps both of us stay focused on that," said Rob Pardo, executive vice president of game design at Blizzard Entertainment. "As part of this agreement, we're going to be changing the name of Blizzard DOTA to Blizzard All-Stars, which ultimately better reflects the design of our game. We look forward to going into more detail on that at a later date."
"We're pleased that we could come to an agreement with Blizzard without drawing things out in a way that would benefit no one," said Gabe Newell, president and co-founder of Valve. "We both want to focus on the things our fans care about, creating and shipping great games for our communities."
The companies do not plan to discuss the terms of the agreement beyond today's announcement.
 |
| 3. |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
May 11, 2012, 16:54 |
jacobvandy |
|
|
| Blizzard was grasping at straws trying to claim ownership of the term, so this is probably a result of them getting their asses handed to them in mediation. Then Valve comes in and says "Let me tell you how this is going to be," but because they're pragmatic and savvy, they play it off as an 'agreement' that is in the best interests of the fans. The whole story is told in the two simple facts that Blizzard is the one backing down and changing the name of their little mod thing, while Valve retains the rights to use the trademark commercially for their new game. There never would have been a suit filed if Blizzard was okay with that from the beginning. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
May 11, 16:32 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Mr. Tact |
| |
2. |
May 11, 16:53 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Frijoles |
| |
8. |
May 11, 17:39 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
The Pyro |
| >> |
3. |
May 11, 16:54 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
jacobvandy |
| |
6. |
May 11, 17:29 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
eunichron |
| |
9. |
May 11, 18:02 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
jacobvandy |
| |
10. |
May 11, 18:05 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Flatline |
| |
13. |
May 11, 18:35 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Mashiki Amiketo |
| |
20. |
May 11, 22:33 |
Valve paid Blizzard to go away. |
IMAPC |
| |
21. |
May 11, 22:37 |
Re: Valve paid Blizzard to go away. |
Prez |
| |
22. |
May 11, 22:48 |
Blizzard was not being an ass here. |
IMAPC |
| |
24. |
May 11, 23:38 |
Re: Blizzard was not being an ass here. |
Prez |
| |
26. |
May 12, 15:33 |
Re: Blizzard was not being an ass here. |
NKD |
| |
15. |
May 11, 20:11 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Paketep |
| |
19. |
May 11, 21:28 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
eunichron |
| |
23. |
May 11, 23:08 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
RollinThundr |
| |
4. |
May 11, 17:08 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
theyarecomingforyou |
| |
5. |
May 11, 17:19 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Bhruic |
| |
7. |
May 11, 17:37 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
loomy |
| |
11. |
May 11, 18:19 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
jacobvandy |
| |
12. |
May 11, 18:33 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Tumbler |
| |
14. |
May 11, 19:58 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Cutter |
| |
16. |
May 11, 20:26 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Beelzebud |
| |
17. |
May 11, 20:48 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
jacobvandy |
| |
18. |
May 11, 21:25 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
Prez |
| |
25. |
May 11, 23:57 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
RailWizard |
| |
27. |
May 13, 13:10 |
Re: DOTA Trademark Settled |
The KillSmith |
|
|