In the gold-based auction house, a 15% transaction fee will be deducted from the final sale price of a successful auction.
In the real-money auction-house, for equipment such as weapons and armor, a fixed transaction fee will be deducted from the seller for each piece of equipment successfully sold. This fee is assessed only if the item is sold. For commodities such as crafting materials, gems, gold, and other “stackable” items, a 15% transaction fee will be deducted from the total sale price.
[…]
Note that additional fees apply for players who choose to receive the proceeds of their successful auction via PayPal™ (in regions where this option is available). See the Functionality section of this FAQ for further details.
RollinThundr wrote on May 7, 2012, 10:32:You sure like to talk about him a lot though...Slippy wrote on May 7, 2012, 10:16:
And no, I’m not Krovven, although I agree with a lot of what he posts when he’s not just flaming another poster.
So basically you agree with Kroven about 1% of the time then? Since generally what he does is go off on people who don't like the same games he likes, then gets all butthurt when called on it?
If that's the type of poster you are, welcome to Blue's, you'll fit right in.
Slippy wrote on May 7, 2012, 10:16
And no, I’m not Krovven, although I agree with a lot of what he posts when he’s not just flaming another poster. [/quote:
So basically you agree with Kroven about 1% of the time then? Since generally what he does is go off on people who don't like the same games he likes, then gets all butthurt when called on it?
If that's the type of poster you are, welcome to Blue's, you'll fit right in.
Quinn wrote on May 7, 2012, 01:29:
Kudo's for you for throwing things out of context. Especially that last quote of mine. How very cheap. I'll trust the others will notice this as well so I'm not gonna spend my time retorting, this morning.
One fast one though, those facts I claimed still didn't imply that I think my hypothesis is fact. Again, thrown out of context.
Your entire reply is cheap.
PS: Are you Krovven?
Krovven wrote on May 6, 2012, 13:56:
Now here is the difference between myself, you and so many others here. I don't go around into threads of games I don't like or have interest in, talk ignorant shit about them and attack the people that do like them. I will however correct stupid shitheads like you when you can't even get the information right about something you want to talk shit about.
Quinn wrote on May 6, 2012, 19:04:
Nor have I claimed "this" or "that" IS or WILL BE fact.
Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 08:22:
This IS the case with most SINGLE PLAYER fanatics like myself.
Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:K, I see one IS and a WILL listed in there... or am I mistaken? I guess if you don't put some kind statment that says 'FACT' next to it we should just ignore it?
There WILL BE thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer.
Quinn wrote on Apr 27, 2012, 21:12:Looks like you mussed that up too...
If you want to be different, just say want you mean and mean what you say and let that be it.
Quinn wrote on Apr 27, 2012, 10:52:I love this... It's one of the most self-centered statements I have ever read on here. But if you really believe this, it explains why you 'speak' for so many in the gaming community... LMAO!
... also well known with all sorts of forums on the internet,...
Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 08:22:Really Dr. Spock?
Without doing the research, logic tells me...
Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:Well that validates things for me...
I'm not sure about my following statement, but:...
Quinn wrote on Apr 23, 2012, 09:39:
I like skill trees, which... implies I'm simple minded.
Now here is the difference between myself, you and so many others here. I don't go around into threads of games I don't like or have interest in, talk ignorant shit about them and attack the people that do like them.
Quinn wrote on May 5, 2012, 21:14:
My "retarded statements" were an hypothesis. I don't even want to use that term but you make me. I do not claim it "is this" or "will be that". You're obviously too dumb to wrap your head around it so I'm done arguing with you, Krovven.
Quinn wrote on May 5, 2012, 21:14:
You're not even remotely trying not to sound like the stereotype online-community asshole, are you?
My "retarded statements" were an hypothesis. I don't even want to use that term but you make me. I do not claim it "is this" or "will be that". You're obviously too dumb to wrap your head around it so I'm done arguing with you, Krovven.
RollinThundr wrote on May 6, 2012, 04:17:
Krowen is the sterotypical Blizzard zealot, say one negative thing regarding one of their games even if it's constructive criticism and his panties get all in a bunch.
Quinn wrote on May 5, 2012, 21:14:Krovven wrote on May 4, 2012, 11:15:Quinn wrote on May 4, 2012, 05:46:Krovven wrote on May 3, 2012, 19:29:Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
There will be thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer. It takes "only a few" (relatively speaking) to collapse the (RM)AH economy entirely.
So people that won't be touching MP or the Auction Houses will collapse the game economy? /facepalm
You didn't read my earlier posts so stop trying to be a condescending smartass, Krovven. I hate it with a goddamn passion that I have to waste my time repeating myself because of people like you.
Multiplayer is integrated in singleplayer in such a way that singleplayer gamers can use the AH without the normally tedious steps of first getting into a multiplayer section of the game. In this way they'll use the AH as just that: a singleplayer AH. This is the first game with such an integration which is why my hypothesis is what it is.
Then don't make retarded statements such as the the game economy collapsing. It doesn't even exist yet and you are talking about it's demise, stringing together unrelated sentences to try and make your case, which have no merit.
You're not even remotely trying not to sound like the stereotype online-community asshole, are you?
My "retarded statements" were an hypothesis. I don't even want to use that term but you make me. I do not claim it "is this" or "will be that". You're obviously too dumb to wrap your head around it so I'm done arguing with you, Krovven.
Krovven wrote on May 4, 2012, 11:15:Quinn wrote on May 4, 2012, 05:46:Krovven wrote on May 3, 2012, 19:29:Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
There will be thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer. It takes "only a few" (relatively speaking) to collapse the (RM)AH economy entirely.
So people that won't be touching MP or the Auction Houses will collapse the game economy? /facepalm
You didn't read my earlier posts so stop trying to be a condescending smartass, Krovven. I hate it with a goddamn passion that I have to waste my time repeating myself because of people like you.
Multiplayer is integrated in singleplayer in such a way that singleplayer gamers can use the AH without the normally tedious steps of first getting into a multiplayer section of the game. In this way they'll use the AH as just that: a singleplayer AH. This is the first game with such an integration which is why my hypothesis is what it is.
Then don't make retarded statements such as the the game economy collapsing. It doesn't even exist yet and you are talking about it's demise, stringing together unrelated sentences to try and make your case, which have no merit.
Slippy wrote on May 4, 2012, 22:25:Let us know how it is. I saw it pop up on steam and it caught my eye.
I'm gonna go try out ORION: Dino Beatdown now... It was released today and I just finished downloading it. I love supporting new developers!
Dev wrote on May 4, 2012, 22:04:Slippy wrote on May 3, 2012, 23:51:No, not really. You can't sell or trade a game like diablo 3. Its locked to your account (like a steam game).
What I mean is you are a very small part of the largest shareholder a company can have... it's customer base. You do own a very small amount of stock in Blizzard when you purchased Diablo 2 (<- meant for example only). You own your stock, you can trade your stock, you can sell your stock and, as a whole, the customer shareholder decides the fate of any company. By your voice, united with the majority of this shareholder base, can change the direction of a company.
This is all that I meant.
Slippy wrote on May 3, 2012, 23:51:No, not really. You can't sell or trade a game like diablo 3. Its locked to your account (like a steam game).
What I mean is you are a very small part of the largest shareholder a company can have... it's customer base. You do own a very small amount of stock in Blizzard when you purchased Diablo 2 (<- meant for example only). You own your stock, you can trade your stock, you can sell your stock and, as a whole, the customer shareholder decides the fate of any company. By your voice, united with the majority of this shareholder base, can change the direction of a company.
This is all that I meant.
Multiplayer is integrated in singleplayer in such a way that singleplayer gamers can use the AH without the normally tedious steps of first getting into a multiplayer section of the game. In this way they'll use the AH as just that: a singleplayer AH. This is the first game with such an integration which is why my hypothesis is what it is.
Quinn wrote on May 4, 2012, 05:46:Krovven wrote on May 3, 2012, 19:29:Quinn wrote on May 3, 2012, 17:13:
There will be thousands of players who are not at all interested in multiplayer. It takes "only a few" (relatively speaking) to collapse the (RM)AH economy entirely.
So people that won't be touching MP or the Auction Houses will collapse the game economy? /facepalm
You didn't read my earlier posts so stop trying to be a condescending smartass, Krovven. I hate it with a goddamn passion that I have to waste my time repeating myself because of people like you.
Multiplayer is integrated in singleplayer in such a way that singleplayer gamers can use the AH without the normally tedious steps of first getting into a multiplayer section of the game. In this way they'll use the AH as just that: a singleplayer AH. This is the first game with such an integration which is why my hypothesis is what it is.
You didn't read my earlier posts so stop trying to be a condescending smartass, Krovven. I hate it with a goddamn passion that I have to waste my time repeating myself because of people like you.