3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 3. |
Re: Hardware Reviews |
Apr 7, 2012, 11:49 |
nin |
|
|
19x10 is fine. Can't remember who, but someone awhile back was claiming that was a low rez also.
Considering that's the most popular rez on steam (with over 25% of the survey using it) and the second most used screen rez is 1366 x 768, I'd hardly call 19x10 "low rez".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Hardware Reviews |
Apr 7, 2012, 05:49 |
Rigs |
|
|
Eh?
1080p is 1920x1080, is it not? Considering my 22" Samsung LCD's native res is 1680x1050, I consider 1080p to be just fine. If it's such a 'low' res, and doesn't stress the hardware, then those fancy AA and AF modes should negate that problem, while giving a speed boost in the process because they aren't hitting their limits... *shrugs*
=-Rigs-= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 'Now, we gave you a promise and we are bound by that promise and damn you for asking for it! And damn me for agreeing to it! And damn all of us to hell, because that is exactly where we're going!' |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Hardware Reviews |
Apr 6, 2012, 14:14 |
ForgedReality |
|
|
re: 680 SLI review
Seriously? Fucking pointless to run that kind of a setup with just a meager 1080p. Why do people still use such low resolutions? You're not even pushing the limits of ONE of those cards at such a low res. Pointless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
