3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 3. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Mar 8, 2012, 14:03 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
that 5.3% is the truth.... and when it comes to money truth is always crushed as collateral damage  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Mar 8, 2012, 14:03 |
Cutter |
|
|
Indeed. It should be a very simple thing for the gubment to ask him to proove his numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Are you crazy? Is that your problem?" - Jack Burton |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Morning Legal Briefs |
Mar 8, 2012, 12:55 |
Creston |
|
|
So a "professor" at some university does "research", and in the course of that research he discovers that 90.2% of Hotfile's traffic is "Clearly copyright infringing" and only 5.3% is "clearly non-infringing."
Now, ignoring the fact that there is absolutely no way to actually be able to make a determination like this, and he is pulling those numbers straight out of the wad of cash the MPAA shoved up his ass, let's ask another question:
When the fuck did it become acceptable in US law for that 5.3% to just be crushed as collateral damage?
Creston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
