 |
| 7. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Feb 28, 2012, 02:19 |
Veterator |
|
|
Bad taste, but hell..the guy said "Want".
I could post @Apple_Store, I want all of your inventory. Could be interpreted as theft......
I want to see some nudes of...... could be I was planning on peeping on her..they should totally identify me and arrange for my "trial by news" because my words COULD be instead of ARE.
Bad taste and really striking vulgar comments, but hell they have people from churches and political crazies running around with signs like "The only good fag is a dead fag" or vaguely threatening wording to Obama. Do they get arrested? I mean hell they are crazy enough to show up on camera with the signs in crowds/gangs/mobs.
When it comes to Bachmann, you could write "Someone should knock some sense into Michelle Bachmann" and no one would bat an eye...because she's a nut. And we ignore nuts until they DO something that requires the law to step in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
|
| |
| |
|
Date |
Subject |
Author |
| |
1. |
Feb 27, 21:14 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
nin |
| |
2. |
Feb 27, 21:47 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
The Half Elf |
| |
3. |
Feb 27, 22:45 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Cutter |
| |
4. |
Feb 27, 23:09 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Frijoles |
| |
5. |
Feb 27, 23:28 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Dev |
| |
6. |
Feb 28, 01:05 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Kitkoan |
| >> |
7. |
Feb 28, 02:19 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Veterator |
| |
8. |
Feb 28, 02:57 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Luke |
| |
9. |
Feb 28, 07:33 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Dmitri_M |
| |
10. |
Feb 28, 08:34 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
eRe4s3r |
| |
11. |
Feb 28, 09:03 |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
TurdFergasun |
|
|
Twitter 
