64 Replies. 4 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 ] Older >
 |
| 64. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 7, 2011, 11:33 |
avianflu |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 63. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 6, 2011, 13:36 |
Creston |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 21:57: This is what is so maddening about the PC elitism here - you guys do not understand that experience != objective. Coming from you, that is absolutely fucking hilarious, since 99% of your arguments are: "I do things this way, therefore IT IS VALID FOR THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE."
Creston |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 62. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 6, 2011, 02:27 |
Jerykk |
|
|
If you do not care about that it does not objectively improve the experience. Sigh. What you care about is irrelevant to something that's objective. That's why it's objective and not subjective. I don't particularly care about the fact that 50 degrees celsius is hotter than 49 degrees celsius. That doesn't change the fact that 50 degrees is hotter than 49 degrees. Similarly, 1920x1080 is higher than 1280x720, which means pixels are smaller and aliasing is reduced. That results in an objectively superior image, especially if you don't have to upscale the image to fit your native resolution. 60 FPS is higher than 30 FPS and provides a smoother presentation and more responsive controls. That is an objectively superior experience. The ability to tweak or modify a game to your taste is objectively superior than the lack of said ability.
You can't honestly argue that the aforementioned things don't improve a game's overall experience. You can argue that they aren't necessary for a good experience, but that's a different argument entirely. A $3 burger can taste good but that doesn't mean the $100 steak doesn't taste better. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 61. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 6, 2011, 02:09 |
Dev |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 21:57: If you do not care about that it does not objectively improve the experience. There are cases where it DOES though. For instance, RTS games where you can see more of the game field on higher resolutions. Larger FOV in FPS games can give an advantage, etc.
If one doesn't care about even those advantages, then they probably are more casual players and don't care about any advantages of PC and are better off sticking with the console, so I don't have to explain the simplest things to them 15 times over before they get it (not talking about anyone in specific, going general now).
I'm the kinda guy who helps people learn the game, and sometimes it gets aggravating explaining things repeatedly to someone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 60. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 6, 2011, 01:53 |
Bhruic |
|
|
You just look for the negatives in everything. Why do you bother gaming then? Whew, for a moment there I thought you'd go straight to over-generalizing about me based on a single comment I made.
I bother gaming because I enjoy gaming. There are plenty of positives in Skyrim, and I've pointed them out where appropriate. I don't consider this one of them. Adding extra immersion factors is good, but only if you do them properly. If not, they actually accomplish the opposite effect of what you are going for. Another example of that - the Whiterun court mage continually comments that if I have an aptitude in magic, I should join the Mage's Guild in Winterhold. Nice. Except that I've already done the Mage's Guild questline and become Archmage. It's pretty stupid to have a mage continuing to suggest I join the guild.
Does that mean that there are no good examples of cool little moments? Nope, you listed a decent one in your post. But that doesn't mean they are all good, and the dragon one is particularily bad. People who completely ignored an epic fight with a dragon shouldn't suddenly be impressed when it's bones on the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 59. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 6, 2011, 01:40 |
jimnms |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 17:24: Which are still considered bad for you: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_19/b4177071221162.htm
It's bad to keep that posture all day long. When you're reclining there's some weight supported by your upper back and your legs. When you're in an office chair it's mostly all your butt and spine, with a little bit by your upper back. This is why many offices are starting to create standing desks, too, which is better for circulation.
"Short of sitting on a spike, you can't do much worse than a standard office chair," You might not have a choice of what chair you sit on at work, but at home no one says you have to sit in an office chair. The most comfortable chair I ever had was like this one except mine didn't have the massage feature. I used to sit at my desk and game slightly reclined with my feet up on the ottoman.
Bhruic wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 17:55:
To me, that was amazing to see, and I explained to my son that it's the little details like that, which make a good game great. It's little details like that that make the game really annoying. I'm sitting there fighting a dragon, and 90% of the people are going about their daily lives, completely ignoring it. I kill it, everyone walks away, shrugging their shoulders. But it starts to glow and then I absorb the soul, and suddenly everyone comes running over like it's a freaking miracle.
If you're going to have people react, don't have them react in a completely unrealistic way. Instead of making it "cool", it breaks immersion. You just look for the negatives in everything. Why do you bother gaming then? I haven't fought a dragon in a city, but I did kill one right outside a small city. When I killed it and went back in the city everyone was commenting on how they had never seen anything like that.
There are a lot of little details that make this game great. The coolest little moment that had a big WOW effect on me was when I was at a forge using a spell to turn iron ore into silver to make some jewelry with a few gems I had to sell. A little kid saw me cast the spell and ran over and asked me if I was a wizard and if I could turn him invisible. I don't remember the exact replies available, but I think one was to tell scram, another was to turn him invisible (I assume you needed a real invisibility spell or potion which I didn't have) and the one I chose was "Poof! your invisible (Lie)." After that he ran around town thinking he was sneaking up on people, yelling boo and making ghost noises.
You can also talk to the children in the towns and some of them will ask you to play tag or hide and seek. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 58. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 22:34 |
Dades |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 21:57: This is what is so maddening about the PC elitism here - you guys do not understand that experience != objective. How an experience is rated is defined on what someone cares about. The PC gives the most options for people to measure their experience. It's an objective fact, not a subjective one. Whether people choose to care about it or not is up to them but that doesn't change the facts. If people want the best experience they will buy the PC version and if they don't then there is always consoles. It's not elitist to state facts. The consoles are inferior machines, this is an objective, measurable fact. You can do everything a console can do with a PC, the same is not true in reverse.
And not everyone cares about what you do. Mirror mirror on the wall. You're talking about living room couches and telling other people they're the ones being elitist. No one is telling you how to enjoy yourself. I have fun at plenty of activities despite not doing it the best possible way. That doesn't mean a better way doesn't exist. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 57. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 22:00 |
Bhruic |
|
|
It doesn't miss the point, and I did not bring up the price part. I just said many people don't feel like paying for graphics You didn't bring up price, you just talked about paying for graphics... Because people expect graphics to be free? The only reason to bring up "paying for graphics" is if the "paying" part is the issue. Which is exactly what you meant, you just want to try and weasel out of it now.
Many people don't even know where to go to buy a graphics card other than Best Buy or Walmart. Many people don't know what the difference between a Wii/PS3/XBox360 are either. That's why they either have to ask a friend, or find out at the store. Both of which are equally possible with graphics cards - even at Best Buy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 56. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 21:57 |
Beamer |
|
|
Jerykk wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 18:55:
I'll give you draw distances, but I fail to see how the ability to tweak or having more graphics options improves gameplay. I turned off the compass because I like exploring and the compass basically ruins that. I also turned off health and magicka regen because they made the game too easy and potions redundant. I also turned off archery aim assist because it felt weird. I also turned off mouse acceleration and V-sync, which helped make the controls significantly more responsive.
These are all tweaks that improved gameplay. Then I have a bunch of tweaks and mods that improve the visuals, which are an important part of the overall experience.
PC gaming is an objectively superior experience. Higher resolutions, higher AA, higher AF, higher-res textures, higher framerates, faster and more precise controls, more flexibility, tweaks, mods, etc. Whether or not you care about any of those things is irrelevant but you can't really debate the fact that it is superior. If you do not care about that it does not objectively improve the experience.
This is what is so maddening about the PC elitism here - you guys do not understand that experience != objective. How an experience is rated is defined on what someone cares about. Therefore if it's possible that someone does not care about something one cannot say it objectively improves an experience. And you certainly can't say that they alone outweigh the other factors someone may care about more.
And not everyone cares about what you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 55. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 21:54 |
Beamer |
|
|
Sepharo wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 20:25: Can someone link me to some evidence that couches are healthier than good desk chairs because that's probably one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
I've never had a couch that I could recline further in than my desk chair so Beamer's example is a bit strange. Unless I'm laying on the couch I've actually found sitting on couches to be a rather uncomfortable experience. Couch cushions are usually too big to be sat in properly unless you have a small couch, so you either end up with dangling feet or empty space/no support in the lumbar area which then causes lower back pain.
So is the whole lumbar support thing just a sham? We're better off sitting on couches which tend not to have lumbar support? It's not about reclining, especially as I doubt you play games reclined in an office chair. Think about a couch - it's a wide cushion. You can sit towards the front and lean back, engulfed in it. Your entire body weight is supported by, well, most of your body. Now read that Businessweek article talking about the curve of the spine and how sitting straight up is very bad for it. If you buy into the article, it recommends a chaise lounge as a good alternative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 54. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 21:48 |
Beamer |
|
|
Bhruic wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 18:51:
Or you can buy a $200 console and plug it in. Yes, you can't do work on it, or buy on Amazon, but cheap laptops sell more than desktops. Why? Because people like using them while sitting on the couch. Oh, good, an example that does nothing to address the point. Who cares about laptops vs desktops? It's completely irrelevant to the issue of PCs vs consoles. A PC can do everything a console can do. A console can't do everything that a PC can do. Your argument was that people don't want to spend lots of money on PCs. Dev (correctly) pointed out that PCs don't cost nearly as much as you were suggesting they do.
So, if you want to disprove that point, either explain why PCs cost more than they actually do, or stop using price as a selling point for consoles.
Oh, and as an aside, it's amusing that someone who has claimed that people don't want to use a mouse and keyboard when they are sitting on the couch is now trying to suggest that people get laptops (with keyboards and trackpads) to use on the couch. No, don't bother with consistency, we don't expect it from you. It doesn't miss the point, and I did not bring up the price part. I just said many people don't feel like paying for graphics. Many people do not feel like spending the time figuring out if a Radeon 2056 is better than a GeForce 1492. Many people don't even know where to go to buy a graphics card other than Best Buy or Walmart.
And they don't care to spend that kind of time when they have something that is fuss-free. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 53. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 21:23 |
xXBatmanXx |
|
|
Sepharo wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 20:25: Can someone link me to some evidence that couches are healthier than good desk chairs because that's probably one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
I've never had a couch that I could recline further in than my desk chair so Beamer's example is a bit strange. Unless I'm laying on the couch I've actually found sitting on couches to be a rather uncomfortable experience. Couch cushions are usually too big to be sat in properly unless you have a small couch, so you either end up with dangling feet or empty space/no support in the lumbar area which then causes lower back pain.
So is the whole lumbar support thing just a sham? We're better off sitting on couches which tend not to have lumbar support? I agree with you. My first thought when playing while reclining, was the pain I get from straining forward while in that position....neither position is good for you. Just paint it however you want to justify it - who gives a shit.
PC > console. Period. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. / Few men have virtue enough to withstand the highest bidder. Playing: RL |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 52. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 20:25 |
Sepharo |
|
|
Can someone link me to some evidence that couches are healthier than good desk chairs because that's probably one of the craziest things I've ever heard.
I've never had a couch that I could recline further in than my desk chair so Beamer's example is a bit strange. Unless I'm laying on the couch I've actually found sitting on couches to be a rather uncomfortable experience. Couch cushions are usually too big to be sat in properly unless you have a small couch, so you either end up with dangling feet or empty space/no support in the lumbar area which then causes lower back pain.
So is the whole lumbar support thing just a sham? We're better off sitting on couches which tend not to have lumbar support? |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| [I'm not trolling I'm just] tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. -TrollinThundr |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 51. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 18:55 |
Jerykk |
|
|
I'll give you draw distances, but I fail to see how the ability to tweak or having more graphics options improves gameplay. I turned off the compass because I like exploring and the compass basically ruins that. I also turned off health and magicka regen because they made the game too easy and potions redundant. I also turned off archery aim assist because it felt weird. I also turned off mouse acceleration and V-sync, which helped make the controls significantly more responsive.
These are all tweaks that improved gameplay. Then I have a bunch of tweaks and mods that improve the visuals, which are an important part of the overall experience.
PC gaming is an objectively superior experience. Higher resolutions, higher AA, higher AF, higher-res textures, higher framerates, faster and more precise controls, more flexibility, tweaks, mods, etc. Whether or not you care about any of those things is irrelevant but you can't really debate the fact that it is superior.
This comment was edited on Dec 5, 2011, 19:19. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 50. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 18:51 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Or you can buy a $200 console and plug it in. Yes, you can't do work on it, or buy on Amazon, but cheap laptops sell more than desktops. Why? Because people like using them while sitting on the couch. Oh, good, an example that does nothing to address the point. Who cares about laptops vs desktops? It's completely irrelevant to the issue of PCs vs consoles. A PC can do everything a console can do. A console can't do everything that a PC can do. Your argument was that people don't want to spend lots of money on PCs. Dev (correctly) pointed out that PCs don't cost nearly as much as you were suggesting they do.
So, if you want to disprove that point, either explain why PCs cost more than they actually do, or stop using price as a selling point for consoles.
Oh, and as an aside, it's amusing that someone who has claimed that people don't want to use a mouse and keyboard when they are sitting on the couch is now trying to suggest that people get laptops (with keyboards and trackpads) to use on the couch. No, don't bother with consistency, we don't expect it from you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 49. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 18:34 |
Beamer |
|
|
Dev wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 18:14:
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 12:44: Except that many no longer want to buy a decent GPU or CPU Except thats not required for majority of games (in large part because of obsolete consoles holding back game development). Thats what many people still think about when they think of PC's and gaming and then choose to go console, but its not the case and hasn't been for years.
Buy some of the cheapest deals out there for PC's going on sale at places like dell or best buy (such as a $300 desktop). They are almost always 64 bit with multicore nowadays. Throw in a $50 on sale graphics card (one that price range CAN be low profile and low power so it can fit into the small cases with lower wattage power supplies), and suddenly it can play most games at decent resolutions (720p and 1080p) and detail, all of which are far better than consoles.
Even building your own, you can do a decent gaming machine for $400 or less. I've done price lists and components and links before in past posts. Or you can buy a $200 console and plug it in. Yes, you can't do work on it, or buy on Amazon, but cheap laptops sell more than desktops. Why? Because people like using them while sitting on the couch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 48. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 18:14 |
Dev |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 12:44: Except that many no longer want to buy a decent GPU or CPU Except thats not required for majority of games (in large part because of obsolete consoles holding back game development). Thats what many people still think about when they think of PC's and gaming and then choose to go console, but its not the case and hasn't been for years.
Buy some of the cheapest deals out there for PC's going on sale at places like dell or best buy (such as a $300 desktop). They are almost always 64 bit with multicore nowadays. Throw in a $50 on sale graphics card (one that price range CAN be low profile and low power so it can fit into the small cases with lower wattage power supplies), and suddenly it can play most games at decent resolutions (720p and 1080p) and detail, and be far better looking than consoles. Connect that xbox 360 controller to the computer and you can use that for most games nowadays too if thats the preferred method of control.
Even building your own, you can do a decent gaming machine for $400 or less. I've done price lists and components and links before in past posts.
The days of needing $1000+ machines for decent gaming are long over. Nowadays thats mostly only required if wanting to do triple or more monitor gaming with 5000x2000+ resolutions at max detail and max AA. And people with the kinda cash to spend on setting up that system also likely have the cash to spend on getting an SLI setup to drive it properly.
This comment was edited on Dec 5, 2011, 18:19. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 47. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 17:55 |
Bhruic |
|
|
To me, that was amazing to see, and I explained to my son that it's the little details like that, which make a good game great. It's little details like that that make the game really annoying. I'm sitting there fighting a dragon, and 90% of the people are going about their daily lives, completely ignoring it. I kill it, everyone walks away, shrugging their shoulders. But it starts to glow and then I absorb the soul, and suddenly everyone comes running over like it's a freaking miracle.
If you're going to have people react, don't have them react in a completely unrealistic way. Instead of making it "cool", it breaks immersion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 46. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 17:53 |
Bhruic |
|
|
Yeah sorry, as much as I'd love an Elder Scrolls game every year it's not even remotely feasible. No, but I never said it was. I'm just saying that I wouldn't get tired of having a new Elder Scrolls game every year if it could be done. Having a new game in a series come out every year is only a bad thing if there are compromises in the quality of the game to make it happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 45. |
Re: Steam Top 10 |
Dec 5, 2011, 17:24 |
Beamer |
|
|
jimnms wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 17:13:
Beamer wrote on Dec 5, 2011, 16:50: And yes, your office chair is less healthy than a couch. There are plenty of studies out there about how bad it is for the body to be upright all day long. On a couch you're reclined and your body is better supported. Why do you have such an uncomfortable, bad for your health office chair in front of your desk then? They do make comfortable, ergonomic desk chairs. Which are still considered bad for you: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_19/b4177071221162.htm
It's bad to keep that posture all day long. When you're reclining there's some weight supported by your upper back and your legs. When you're in an office chair it's mostly all your butt and spine, with a little bit by your upper back. This is why many offices are starting to create standing desks, too, which is better for circulation.
"Short of sitting on a spike, you can't do much worse than a standard office chair," |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
64 Replies. 4 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 ] Older >
|
|