212 Replies. 11 pages. Viewing page 10.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Older >
 |
| 32. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:50 |
killer_roach |
|
|
Xombie wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 12:00: GLADD is a great organization, but they're not above criticism for manufactured outrage. Manufactured outrage is GLAAD's bread and butter. Personally, I don't really care much about the issue one way or the other, but I find it ironic that, by going off on these bents, GLAAD is reinforcing a lot of negative stereotypes about the gay community. Any quicker to write a press release to express outrage and they'd have to conclude it with "well, I never...!", snap their fingers, and walk off in a huff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 31. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:38 |
Verno |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 11:22: "Gay" and "fag" were VERY commonly used words when I was in high school and after, mid-90's to early 2000's. It's going to take a lot of time for them to become the horrible slurs that instantly identify you as a homophobe that GLAAD and similar groups want them to be. Personally I bet that 80 year olds who were born in the 80's and 90's still say those words casually in 50 years, just like my grandpa still says all manner of shit currently considered racist/sexist/whatever. That's just human nature.
It's more about context than any words instantly identifying you as anything.
All that said, their performance was disgusting and not something I personally enjoy. Yep exactly. Whenever my grandfather would talk about the war he'd pop out racist stuff about the Japanese as if he was discussing the weather or the football score. Calling someone a "fag" was so common growing up in school that you just start doing it by reflex. I'm not saying it's right or wrong but some people just don't jump immediately into righteous indignation when they hear it.
I remember a gay comic doing a bit about this awhile ago and his suggestion was for gay people to care about the issues that directly impact your financial and physical well being instead of wasting time getting offended at every ignorant idiot who manages to use the megaphone. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Playing: Animal Crossing, Sleeping Dogs, Tales of Graces F Watching: Survivorman, Justified, Silent Running |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 30. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:13 |
dj LiTh |
|
|
| I blame the Alliance for this... |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 29. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:12 |
Beamer |
|
|
Xombie wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 12:00: And what I'm saying is that in the context (which means how, not what) that was used, Fisher is as much of a homophobe as he is a murderer. Again, it's his choice of words. No one is calling him a homophobe, they're saying he chose his words poorly by using "homosexual" as a synonym for "bad."
I can't tell if you're blindly defending WoW, blindly defending Cannibal Corpse or blindly defending that using "homosexual" to mean "shitty," but all three more or less suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 28. |
removed |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:10 |
Mashiki Amiketo |
|
|
* REMOVED * This comment was deleted on Oct 27, 2011, 12:18. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
-- "For every human problem, there is a neat, simple solution; and it is always wrong." --H.L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 27. |
removed |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:08 |
EddieTheHack |
|
|
* REMOVED * This comment was deleted on Oct 27, 2011, 12:18. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 26. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 12:00 |
Xombie |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 11:44: It. Doesn't. Matter.
It's not what he meant to say or what he meant to imply. GLAAD doesn't give a shit about the Alliance. What matters is the context in which he used the words he used. Joking or not he still chose those words for that meaning and that's what GLAAD is taking offense to. And what I'm saying is that in the context (which means how, not what) that was used, Fisher is as much of a homophobe as he is a murderer.
GLADD shouldn't have bothered with this, and shouldn't have brought Blizzard into it since Blizzard has nothing to do with the slurs, since they removed them from the clip they showed. The only place the slurs existed is in the original speech on YouTube, so even there the issue was with him and the interviewer, which itself is too obscure to warrant any concern.
GLADD is a great organization, but they're not above criticism for manufactured outrage. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 25. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:56 |
PropheT |
|
|
Muscular Beaver wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 10:45: What? He only quoted a few sentences from everyday Trade Chat business. That was my first thought. He's only playing to the crowd, among whom that sort of thing is pretty standard conversational fare. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 24. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:44 |
Beamer |
|
|
Xombie wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 11:21:
he's using "homosexual" as a synonym for "pathetic." You're still not getting it. He is not being serious about insulting them at all. Not just not "literally a homosexual who has sex with men". He was joking about the very concept of having any animosity at all. He was being hyperbolic about using "gay" in a figurative, insulting sense. It. Doesn't. Matter.
It's not what he meant to say or what he meant to imply. GLAAD doesn't give a shit about the Alliance. What matters is the context in which he used the words he used. Joking or not he still chose those words for that meaning and that's what GLAAD is taking offense to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 23. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:32 |
Muscular Beaver |
|
|
ZeroCougar wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 11:15: Alright well with it being monitored I'll give my thoughts a bit.
I think they really shouldn't be using those words. Its 2011 that kind of child like talk should be over by the time you leave middle-school, or whatever your countries similar type of early-teen place of learning maybe.
I guess the Human race's destiny is to endlessly take two steps forward and one step back. Or in Cannibal corpse's case here 3 steps back. Maybe you Americans should just stop to satanize such words then, because in countries where they are not as satanized, kids simply dont use them that much nor that long, because nobody cares anyway.
Just learn it already, if you want something like that to vanish, IGNORE IT and dont give it even more attention. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Oh that is so lame... You will PAY for your use of inappropriate dialogue! - Mojo Jojo |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 22. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:30 |
Optional nickname |
|
|
Dont get MAAD, get GLAAD.
Blizzard is so gay.
I wonder how many times the word gay was typed in WOW sessions, you probably need Trillions of Kilobytes to capture the amount of times used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 21. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:22 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
"Gay" and "fag" were VERY commonly used words when I was in high school and after, mid-90's to early 2000's. It's going to take a lot of time for them to become the horrible slurs that instantly identify you as a homophobe that GLAAD and similar groups want them to be. Personally I bet that 80 year olds who were born in the 80's and 90's still say those words casually in 50 years, just like my grandpa still says all manner of shit currently considered racist/sexist/whatever. That's just human nature.
It's more about context than any words instantly identifying you as anything.
All that said, their performance was disgusting and not something I personally enjoy. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 20. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:21 |
Xombie |
|
|
he's using "homosexual" as a synonym for "pathetic." You're still not getting it. He is not being serious about insulting them at all. Not just not "literally a homosexual who has sex with men". He was joking about the very concept of having any animosity at all. He was being hyperbolic about using "gay" in a figurative, insulting sense.
I'm not sure how many other ways I can explain this: you can use figurative words inside hyperbole. In the context of the way he was speaking, he was pretending to call them figuratively gay in the same way that he was pretending to want to kill them. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 19. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:15 |
ZeroCougar |
|
|
Alright well with it being monitored I'll give my thoughts a bit.
I think they really shouldn't be using those words. Its 2011 that kind of child like talk should be over by the time you leave middle-school, or whatever your countries similar type of early-teen place of learning maybe.
I guess the Human race's destiny is to endlessly take two steps forward and one step back. Or in Cannibal corpse's case here 3 steps back. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| - That's a very nice everything you have there... ssssssssSSSSSSSSSSS - |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 18. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:07 |
Beamer |
|
|
Xombie wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 11:02:
You realize it's more offensive because he doesn't think they're gay, right? Or do you really misunderstand the whole fundamental concept?
Also, Cannibal Corpse are hacks. I think you misunderstood the whole fundamental concept. It's hyperbole. His speech is intended to sound completely overblown and overly offensive and ridiculous. You're free to not like the theatrics, but that doesn't make them any more serious in context. Indeed, I am free not to, as is GLAAD.
Again, what makes it so offensive is that it's hyperbole. Again, you clearly misunderstand the entire fundamental concept here. He isn't saying "The Alliance are a whole bunch of males that have sex with each other," he's is making the metaphor of "the Alliance are a bunch of weak, lame weenies which is pathetic and similar to men who have sex with men."
This is why it's offensive - he's using "homosexual" as a synonym for "pathetic." And you don't think people that are homosexual would find this offensive? That the hyperbole makes it worse?
Again, you miss the entire fundamental concept. You must not be thinking about it very hard. You're just saying "haha, it's funny, gay people lighten up!" I'd wonder if you'd feel the same if they took your name and turned it into a synonym for "idiotic." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 17. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 11:02 |
Xombie |
|
|
You realize it's more offensive because he doesn't think they're gay, right? Or do you really misunderstand the whole fundamental concept?
Also, Cannibal Corpse are hacks. I think you misunderstood the whole fundamental concept. It's hyperbole. His speech is intended to sound completely overblown and overly offensive and ridiculous. You're free to not like the theatrics, but that doesn't make them any more serious in context. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Xombie x0mbie x0mb|e Xombie |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 16. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 10:59 |
Bhruic |
|
|
nature says homosexuality is wrong I was totally talking to nature the other day, and she said that she's actually changed her mind on the whole homosexuality thing.
And bacon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 15. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 10:54 |
Blue |
|
|
ZeroCougar wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 10:45: And with that here comes the R&P debate, that doesn't belong on a gaming site.
Just lock the thread now Blue, I'm sure it will not take long for this topic discussion to go from games centric to Religion & Politics. Well it would be unfortunate to have to lock a thread about the implications of free speech... if irony was inflammable we might start a fire. I agree though, that there's no need for this to get into a religious debate, so having responded to that post, I'll most likely delete future attempts to take this thread down that path. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Stephen "Blue" Heaslip Blue's News Publisher, Editor-in-Chief, El Presidente for Life |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 14. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 10:53 |
Beamer |
|
|
Blue wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 10:50:
AnointedSword wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 10:35: Ohhh yes, we cannot disagree with people's views anymore and get away with it. You know what, I am a Christian, we get bashed a lot as well. Yup, but I would not call it hate speech. For example, if someone kills a christian, they should be charged for murder. We start adding all this other bs to the mix and you will see homosexuals getting locked up for speaking their mind against Christians. I am not for hate speech regulation because guess who defines what hate speech is? You guessed it...the government and states...What exactly is hate speech? The bible and nature says homosexuality is wrong...Does that mean I cannot believe and have religious freedoms any longer? I am all for everyone being able to speak their mind. That includes the Christian, the muslim, etc... So this inspired you to pen an impassioned response in favor of hate speech? Interesting.
For the record, they have not actually locked up anyone here for the opinions they expressed, so you can cancel the order for a phony passport, they're probably not coming after you either. And no one mentioned any "regulation," the band member expressed his thoughts on this topic, as has GLAAD. Since you seem to be all for free speech, you should be pleased as punch at how this all worked out. And now we're expressing our thoughts on it as well. In effect, he's saying we shouldn't be outraged, so he's the one trying to regulate a reaction and speech itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
| 13. |
Re: BlizzCon Hate-Speech Criticized |
Oct 27, 2011, 10:50 |
Blue |
|
|
AnointedSword wrote on Oct 27, 2011, 10:35: Ohhh yes, we cannot disagree with people's views anymore and get away with it. You know what, I am a Christian, we get bashed a lot as well. Yup, but I would not call it hate speech. For example, if someone kills a christian, they should be charged for murder. We start adding all this other bs to the mix and you will see homosexuals getting locked up for speaking their mind against Christians. I am not for hate speech regulation because guess who defines what hate speech is? You guessed it...the government and states...What exactly is hate speech? The bible and nature says homosexuality is wrong...Does that mean I cannot believe and have religious freedoms any longer? I am all for everyone being able to speak their mind. That includes the Christian, the muslim, etc... So this inspired you to pen an impassioned response in favor of hate speech? Interesting.
For the record, they have not actually locked up anyone for the opinions they expressed there, so you can cancel the order for a phony passport, they're probably not coming after you either. And no one mentioned any "regulation," the band member expressed his thoughts on this topic, as has GLAAD. Since you seem to be all for free speech, you should be pleased as punch at how this all worked out. |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Stephen "Blue" Heaslip Blue's News Publisher, Editor-in-Chief, El Presidente for Life |
|
|
|
|
| |
212 Replies. 11 pages. Viewing page 10.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ] Older >
|
|