57 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 3.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older >
 |
| 17. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 21:32 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
| And just today my Bulletstorm won't update on GFWL, tells me I'm not connected to the internet. Yes I'm posting here from the quasinet. But go and look, common. I mean what do I have to do. I jump in my router open the proper ports, no matter, open all ports, no matter. I mean I can log into GFWL but it tells me no soup for me on updating the game. So I can't net up with a buddy. Testing a hard to find patch outside the normal means, perhaps I'll get lucky that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 16. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 21:17 |
JayDeath |
|
|
| This is wonderful news. I too was gonna buy for my 360 to avoid using GFWL. WooT! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I own three copies of Bioshock. Ha! |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 15. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 21:16 |
elefunk |
|
|
Yosemite Sam wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 20:14:
nin wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:46:
Crossing my fingers! That would make the difference between a pc or console purchase.
This is a console game for me regardless. Just like RTS and FPS games are best played on a PC, games like this are best played on a console, IMO.
What?
If you use a 360 controller on PC, the game plays exactly the same. However you'll also get 60fps, higher resolutions, a lower price, and all the other usual stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 20:45 |
jacobvandy |
|
|
Yosemite Sam wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 20:14:
nin wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:46:
Crossing my fingers! That would make the difference between a pc or console purchase.
This is a console game for me regardless. Just like RTS and FPS games are best played on a PC, games like this are best played on a console, IMO.
Batman: AA was a perfect example of the PC doing a console game better than consoles. Plug your Xbox 360 controller into your computer and you have the same game, but with way better graphics. Even more so if you have a modern GeForce card and can crank up the PhysX. I'm looking forward to Arkham City offering a similar experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 20:41 |
Prez |
|
|
| Thank God for that. GFWL is crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 20:31 |
tony |
|
|
Yosemite Sam wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 20:14:
nin wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:46:
Crossing my fingers! That would make the difference between a pc or console purchase.
This is a console game for me regardless. Just like RTS and FPS games are best played on a PC, games like this are best played on a console, IMO.
This game controls as well as any other FPS or 3rd person game with a mouse and keyboard. I completely respect and agree that racing games, fighting games, and many platform games are best played with a controller, but no way I'm ever playing a fpp or 3pp without a mouse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 20:14 |
nin |
|
|
tony wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 19:51:
GreenManGaming also lists Batman AA as not being able to be traded in, giving reason to believe it will be tied to some sort of client. Batman AA's publisher, Warner bros., used steamworks for it's last two PC releases (Bastion and FEAR 3) soooo.....
I like those odds. They typically list steam games as non-tradeable.
This is a console game for me regardless. Just like RTS and FPS games are best played on a PC, games like this are best played on a console, IMO.
It played great on the 360, but I would expect it to look better on the PC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 20:14 |
Yosemite Sam |
|
|
nin wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:46:
Crossing my fingers! That would make the difference between a pc or console purchase.
This is a console game for me regardless. Just like RTS and FPS games are best played on a PC, games like this are best played on a console, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSN id PR345, PST - GTA4, BoS, COD WaW, KZ2, Borderlands, RAGE, GT5, Dirt2, MC LA, Skate2, RDR, LBP, Uncharted2-3, Burnout Paradise, Tiger Woods 10, Dead Nation - Mention Blues News.
CIV4 MOD http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=326525 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 19:51 |
tony |
|
|
| GreenManGaming also lists Batman AA as not being able to be traded in, giving reason to believe it will be tied to some sort of client. Batman AA's publisher, Warner bros., used steamworks for it's last two PC releases (Bastion and FEAR 3) soooo..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 17:04 |
Blue |
|
|
Rhett wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:59:
Online matchmaking? Where did I miss the inclusion of multiplayer?
These aren't the droids you're looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen "Blue" Heaslip
Blue's News Publisher, Editor-in-Chief, El Presidente for Life |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 16:45 |
Ludomancer |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 16:38 |
Sempai |
|
|
| There is a God! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 16:18 |
Wookiestick |
|
|
Rhett wrote on Aug 27, 2011, 15:59:
Online matchmaking? Where did I miss the inclusion of multiplayer? The first one had time trial scoreboards. You could do certain events in the game and earn so many points in so much time. It was then posted to competitive leaderboards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Love thy wookie.
Steam/Xbox Live Name: Wookiestick |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 16:06 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
| That's huge to me, hate that pos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 15:59 |
Rhett |
|
|
| Online matchmaking? Where did I miss the inclusion of multiplayer? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 15:57 |
D4rkKnight |
|
|
They should start listing this on retail PC games as a feature.
*Spectacular Graphics!
*Exciting Combat!
*No GFWL implementation! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? |
Aug 27, 2011, 15:46 |
nin |
|
|
Crossing my fingers! That would make the difference between a pc or console purchase.
This comment was edited on Aug 27, 2011, 15:51. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RollinThundr Apr 17, 2013, 12:25: Eh really tossing stuff like that in there only to get your panties all bunched up. If you really want to call that trolling sure.
Mr. Tact Apr 17, 2013, 12:33: Pretty sure that's the definition of trolling... |
|
|
|
|
| |
57 Replies. 3 pages. Viewing page 3.
< Newer [ 1 2 3 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
