Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Morning Tech Bits

View
12. Re: Morning Tech Bits Aug 23, 2011, 00:19 Evil Timmy
 
Also, how useless is it to run the game at 1680x1050, especially when that'll result in framerates well over what any consumer-grade display will be able to output? They're benchmarks the old-school way: numbers that are useless except for the online equivalent of comparing sizes at the gym. That's why [H]ardOCP (BTW, thanks for the review link, Calwen) is always my choice for hardware reviews, due to their benchmarking methodology. What matters is what settings you can run on various hardware configs, not "This card gets 45FPS, whereas the other card gets 48FPS!" The former you'll notice most if not all of the time, the latter you'd be hard pressed to see without an FPS counter. Yet, the [H] is still the only place I know of using that far more reasonable performance metric.  
Avatar 19465
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Aug 22, 11:49 Re: Morning Tech Bits nin
  2. Aug 22, 12:42  Re: Morning Tech Bits McSterls
  3. Aug 22, 13:10   Re: Morning Tech Bits eRe4s3r
  4. Aug 22, 13:44    Re: Morning Tech Bits DG
  5. Aug 22, 14:17     Re: Morning Tech Bits eRe4s3r
  7. Aug 22, 14:43      Re: Morning Tech Bits Quboid
  8. Aug 22, 14:58       Re: Morning Tech Bits eRe4s3r
  10. Aug 22, 18:49       Re: Morning Tech Bits Creston
  11. Aug 22, 19:39        Re: Morning Tech Bits CJ_Parker
>> 12. Aug 23, 00:19         Re: Morning Tech Bits Evil Timmy
  6. Aug 22, 14:35 Re: Morning Tech Bits Jay
  9. Aug 22, 17:56 Re: Morning Tech Bits Calwen


footer

Blue's News logo